Barack Obama is the only candidate in either party who is capable of bringing the country together in a way that changes our politics. Without this kind of change, we will NEVER achieve the kind of transformational change necessary to end the war in Iraq with honor, provide universal healthcare, secure Social Security and Medicare, bring about meaningful immigration reform or seriously address global climate change.
Bill Clinton, a much more talented politician than Hillary, did NOTHING to advance the cause of: universal healthcare, climate change, Social Security & Medicare reform, or immigration reform. Do you really think that the most polarizing politician in the country can do better?
John Edwards spent 6 years in the Senate talking and voting like a moderate Democrat (pro-NAFTA, pro-Iraq war) and did NOTHING to advance the causes he now claims to be "fighting" for. At best, he's had a change of heart since his one and only position in elective office.
Barack Obama has already amassed a more impressive legislative record in the Senate than either Hillary or Edwards, to say nothing of his 8 years in the state legislature. Moreover, unlike the other two, his campaign style has not wavered depending on his position in the polls. No 527's (unlike Edwards) and no scurrilous character attacs (unlike Clinton). Perhaps this is why Obama, and Obama alone, defeats all Republicans in the most current polling data, and why Obama attracts the strongest support from independents.
If you want more of the same, vote for Clinton. If you want a LANDSLIDE and new progressive majority, vote for Obama.
Barack Obama is the only candidate in either party who is capable of bringing the country together in a way that changes our politics. Without this kind of change, we will NEVER achieve the kind of transformational change necessary to end the war in Iraq with honor, provide universal healthcare, secure Social Security and Medicare, bring about meaningful immigration reform or seriously address global climate change.
Bill Clinton, a much more talented politician than Hillary, did NOTHING to advance the cause of: universal healthcare, climate change, Social Security & Medicare reform, or immigration reform. Do you really think that the most polarizing politician in the country can do better?
John Edwards spent 6 years in the Senate talking and voting like a moderate Democrat (pro-NAFTA, pro-Iraq war) and did NOTHING to advance the causes he now claims to be "fighting" for. At best, he's had a change of heart since his one and only position in elective office.
Barack Obama has already amassed a more impressive legislative record in the Senate than either Hillary or Edwards, to say nothing of his 8 years in the state legislature. Moreover, unlike the other two, his campaign style has not wavered depending on his position in the polls. No 527's (unlike Edwards) and no scurrilous character attacs (unlike Clinton). Perhaps this is why Obama, and Obama alone, defeats all Republicans in the most current polling data, and why Obama attracts the strongest support from independents.
If you want more of the same, vote for Clinton. If you want a LANDSLIDE and new progressive majority, vote for Obama.