renatam (not verified) says:

Why doesn't our PRESS try something new and STOP COVERING BILL CLINTON, who is NOT the candidate and only manipulating YOU to stop proper vetting of Hillary? He has nothing substantive to say and is not honoring his role as a former President. Billary are complaining, so WHY DON'T YOU FOCUS ON ONLY HILLARY CLINTON AND HER RECORD, VOTES, THE CLINTON WHITE HOUSE YEARS AND HER VALIDATED PART IN WHAT OCCURRED -- GOOD AND BAD??? In an ironic twist, Bill Clinton is correct in his assessment of the PRESS since he orchestrated and is conducting what is happening and how it happens. A former President commands focus by the PRESS. Michelle Obama and Elizabeth Edwards do not. Turn the page. Ignore him since he is not conducting himself appropriately as a former President. Treat him exactly like you would treat Michelle or Elizabeth -- just the ordinary "supportive" spouse he claims he is. Don't show up where he is. Don't take his calls. Don't take the Clinton Campaign's calls if it has anything to do w/the Bill Clinton, SPOUSE. He isn't running the Nation and has violated (again) all sense of propriety, so IGNORE HIM...and focus instead on Hillary Clinton. Then, you won't have to be reduced to his basing in your face and finger wagging...like children. Oops! I forgot, the "child" identity is Mr. Obama's. Nice.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.