This column echoes others that have tried to paint Hillary Clinton as an "innocent" in Bill's behavior and comments, but their moves were obviously coordinated, as evidenced by Hillary's pointing out in one debate that it was not she who had referenced Ronald Reagan in criticizing Obama, but her husband. The role that Bill and other surrogates play gives her plausible deniability, but a smart columnist like Joe should see through that and point it out to his readers. Whose idea was it to suggest that students shouldn't be able to vote in Iowa (since they were for Obama), or to sue to prevent the Culinary Workers from caucusing in their workplaces in Nevada (because they were for Obama), or to leave her name on the ballot in Michigan and to essentially run in Florida, with an eye toward breaking party rules somewhere down the line? Were these accidents that were simply out of Hillary's hands as well, or are they further evidence that Hillary has not only torn several pages out of the Karl Rove playbook, but that she has seriously studied them? Time to buy stock in Kool Aid, 'cuz so many Democrats and pundits are still drinking it.