Perhaps the author is not so hard up and is reacting to groups like New York chapter of NOW which labled Sen. Kennedy's endorsement of Sen. Obama instead of Sen. Clinton as the "ultimate betrayal", even though Sen. Kennedy has been a leading supporter of Women's Rights for decades. Moreover, Ms. Papas, NY NOW's head, state emphatically that Sen. Clinton's gender was the main reason for supporting her. This is not a criticism of Sen. Clinton; just pointing out that the article is relevant and franklly, I found both amusing in tone and interresting for demonstrating that there are fissures between some women-oriented poltical and economic groups.
Perhaps the author is not so hard up and is reacting to groups like New York chapter of NOW which labled Sen. Kennedy's endorsement of Sen. Obama instead of Sen. Clinton as the "ultimate betrayal", even though Sen. Kennedy has been a leading supporter of Women's Rights for decades. Moreover, Ms. Papas, NY NOW's head, state emphatically that Sen. Clinton's gender was the main reason for supporting her. This is not a criticism of Sen. Clinton; just pointing out that the article is relevant and franklly, I found both amusing in tone and interresting for demonstrating that there are fissures between some women-oriented poltical and economic groups.