solstice2005 (not verified) says:

It seems a real waste to have these reporters out in the field
risking their lives and publish with such little analytical content. The Economist may not have the reporters in the field but (following I.F. Stone's principle of analyzing what the information that is available) comes up with actual information as to what is likely happening.
So, cool off, Meacham! I read your rag while waiting at the dentist but never buy it. Instead I subscribe to The Economist: much more expensive than Newsweek but a better price-quality ratio!
You know it and we know it!

Reply

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.