It seems a real waste to have these reporters out in the field
risking their lives and publish with such little analytical content. The Economist may not have the reporters in the field but (following I.F. Stone's principle of analyzing what the information that is available) comes up with actual information as to what is likely happening.
So, cool off, Meacham! I read your rag while waiting at the dentist but never buy it. Instead I subscribe to The Economist: much more expensive than Newsweek but a better price-quality ratio!
You know it and we know it!
It seems a real waste to have these reporters out in the field
risking their lives and publish with such little analytical content. The Economist may not have the reporters in the field but (following I.F. Stone's principle of analyzing what the information that is available) comes up with actual information as to what is likely happening.
So, cool off, Meacham! I read your rag while waiting at the dentist but never buy it. Instead I subscribe to The Economist: much more expensive than Newsweek but a better price-quality ratio!
You know it and we know it!