Most of my news is obtained up to the minute from the Net. Yes, the Times, as are so many news outlets, is biased, and even prejudiced. If they were reporters instead of "journalists", perhaps they would receive a better reception from a currently disinterested public.
Additionally, the Times is the only newspaper I know of that has a bigger entertainment section than their 'news' section. It seems the Times is more interested in what the celebrities are doing than what local citizens are up to. Each day, their entertainment sections have more pages than the rest of the sections. I pass over those activities and skip to what is left of the "comic" section, another area of political correctness and proposed diversity, even though they are not funny and have been cut to the bone.
Most of my news is obtained up to the minute from the Net. Yes, the Times, as are so many news outlets, is biased, and even prejudiced. If they were reporters instead of "journalists", perhaps they would receive a better reception from a currently disinterested public.
Additionally, the Times is the only newspaper I know of that has a bigger entertainment section than their 'news' section. It seems the Times is more interested in what the celebrities are doing than what local citizens are up to. Each day, their entertainment sections have more pages than the rest of the sections. I pass over those activities and skip to what is left of the "comic" section, another area of political correctness and proposed diversity, even though they are not funny and have been cut to the bone.