What horseshit. How can people continue to talk about white voting bias when blacks are voting for Obama at 85-90 percent? By all objective measures, the REAL racial bias in evidence in this primary season is that of blacks, not whites. New Hampshire was 94 percent white, yet Obama came rather close to winning. Would Hillary Clinton stand a snowball's chance in hell of competing in a state that was 94 percent black?
Further, this leftist myth about whites who "conceal biases" when speaking to pollsters is just that. The polls got it wrong in New Hampshire. They were wrong about Dewey and Truman, too. Further, WHY ON EARTH was there no mention of the fact that Obama's margins with blacks in South Carolina and Nevada turned out to be FAR HIGHER than pre-primary polls indicated? On the eve of South Carolina, polls showed Obama polling at 64-66 percent among blacks, yet exit polls showed that he carried about 80 percent. In Nevada, polls show him carrying 66-68 percent of black support, yet he wound up with 84 percent.
Could it be that blacks "concealed their biases," too?
OF COURSE NOT! AND WHY?
Because the self-loathing liberal media elites and their black demagogue masters refuse to allow objective, race-neutral coverage of blacks or black candidates. So far as they're concerned, racism is an exclusive product of the white community.
What horseshit. How can people continue to talk about white voting bias when blacks are voting for Obama at 85-90 percent? By all objective measures, the REAL racial bias in evidence in this primary season is that of blacks, not whites. New Hampshire was 94 percent white, yet Obama came rather close to winning. Would Hillary Clinton stand a snowball's chance in hell of competing in a state that was 94 percent black?
Further, this leftist myth about whites who "conceal biases" when speaking to pollsters is just that. The polls got it wrong in New Hampshire. They were wrong about Dewey and Truman, too. Further, WHY ON EARTH was there no mention of the fact that Obama's margins with blacks in South Carolina and Nevada turned out to be FAR HIGHER than pre-primary polls indicated? On the eve of South Carolina, polls showed Obama polling at 64-66 percent among blacks, yet exit polls showed that he carried about 80 percent. In Nevada, polls show him carrying 66-68 percent of black support, yet he wound up with 84 percent.
Could it be that blacks "concealed their biases," too?
OF COURSE NOT! AND WHY?
Because the self-loathing liberal media elites and their black demagogue masters refuse to allow objective, race-neutral coverage of blacks or black candidates. So far as they're concerned, racism is an exclusive product of the white community.