It's undemocratic for any one to say Ralph should not run for President.
If I were to choose between the more important issue, (War or environment) I would pick environment because it has the potential to negatively take more lives unless a nuke is set off.
Therefore, I feel it best that Gore lost so he could pursue his global warming efforts and raise awareness. I bet if you asked him, He would agree. We can fix the damage Bush has done. The Dems just need to get off their butt, organize and vote. Look at how many Democrats voted for Bush in 2000 yet one never hears about that. What about the folks who voted for Bush. You never hear about that. Should we be reduced to two partys? Don't 3rd partys serve a purpose by bringing up topics the others shy away from?
Dispelling the Myth of Election 2000:
Did Nader Cost Gore the Election?
http://www.cagreens.org/alameda/city/0803myth/myth.html
It's undemocratic for any one to say Ralph should not run for President.
If I were to choose between the more important issue, (War or environment) I would pick environment because it has the potential to negatively take more lives unless a nuke is set off.
Therefore, I feel it best that Gore lost so he could pursue his global warming efforts and raise awareness. I bet if you asked him, He would agree. We can fix the damage Bush has done. The Dems just need to get off their butt, organize and vote. Look at how many Democrats voted for Bush in 2000 yet one never hears about that. What about the folks who voted for Bush. You never hear about that. Should we be reduced to two partys? Don't 3rd partys serve a purpose by bringing up topics the others shy away from?