Alohilani (not verified) says:

RocketScience, your observation about the 'experience argument' only serves to highlight how incredibly hidebound the Clinton camp is. In truth, no candidate has the experience to be president, but when Sen. Clinton chooses to brag about 35 years of nebulousness and mediocrity, she should not be surprised when people gravitate towards someone better. Sen. Clinton claims that Obama is naïve. When someone starts out with a 49% negative approval rating, AND begins dismissing half the electorate (including those citizens who voted for HER), who’s really being naïve here? And as for Bill saying “members of the Obama campaign believe they can come in that night and take the delegates away,” only someone with a sense of entitlement would say such drivel. The scent of manure is starting to make me gag.

Hope. Change. Pragmatism. Obama/Sebelius ‘08

Reply

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.