missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Alohilani (not verified) says:

Well, since this Obama supporter is a 'kool-aid drinking' 'cult member', I guess Senator Clinton doesn't need my paltry vote in November, should she win the nomination.
But hey, why would anyone need my help when they have a negative approval rating of 59%? And since she has "actual experience", she obviously thought her negative approval ratings were not low enough, she went out of her way to sink it even more by dissing members of her own (supposed) party. What an astute woman!

As for me, I choose to stick with Barack Obama. I know, I know; why in the name of Tesla would I vote for a man who spent 8 years in the Illinois Senate, and 3 years in the U.S. Senate? But gosh darn it, that's what kind of a woman I am. I prefer to cast my vote for a résumé that I can see, not for one that has been padded with silicone.

Hillary Clinton. The Lurleen Wallace of the 21st century.
And Ted Strickland is her willing enabler.
The Democratic Party can do much better than the amoral and incompetent Clinton.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.