missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Ross Odom (not verified) says:
Here are a few other things that have happened before
which you and the like-minded choose to ignore.
World War I
Woodrow Wilson, DEMOCRAT
U.S. deaths-115,000
World War II
Franklin Roosevelt, DEMOCRAT
U.S. deaths-400,000.
Korean War
Harry Truman, DEMOCRAT
U.S. deaths-36,000
Vietnam War
John Kennedy, DEMOCRAT
Lyndon Johnson, DEMOCRAT
U.S. deaths-58,000.
The War in Iraq
George Bush, REPUBLICAN
U.S. deaths-4,000.
In other words, any Democrat carrying out any war, resulting in any number of casualties is given a pass, or even celebrated. But a Republican using the same military force, with the fewest casualties of any major war, ever, is roundly condemned before the thing is even over with.
Am I the only one who detects a partisan pattern here?
Here are a few other things that have happened before
which you and the like-minded choose to ignore.
World War I
Woodrow Wilson, DEMOCRAT
U.S. deaths-115,000
World War II
Franklin Roosevelt, DEMOCRAT
U.S. deaths-400,000.
Korean War
Harry Truman, DEMOCRAT
U.S. deaths-36,000
Vietnam War
John Kennedy, DEMOCRAT
Lyndon Johnson, DEMOCRAT
U.S. deaths-58,000.
The War in Iraq
George Bush, REPUBLICAN
U.S. deaths-4,000.
In other words, any Democrat carrying out any war, resulting in any number of casualties is given a pass, or even celebrated. But a Republican using the same military force, with the fewest casualties of any major war, ever, is roundly condemned before the thing is even over with.
Am I the only one who detects a partisan pattern here?