missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
howard lohmuller (not verified) says:

Too many in the media are trying to estimate whether Senator Obama's speech was convincing enough to separate himself from his racist church and pastor. The strategic question that should be considered is did the speech do enough to convince the remaining uncommitted super delegates to vote for him if he wins the majority of delegates. If he does poorer than expected in Pennsylvania, polls continue to show him losing ground to Mrs. Clinton, super delegates might decide she has a better chance of winning the general election.

Congressman Jack Murtha, a super delegate and close associate of Speaker Pelosi who backs Obama, just decided to back Senator Clinton. So far then, regardless of what the media thinks about the speech, it has not helped Obama.

There may also be more shoes to drop for Obama, namely his Rezco problem and dirty politics in Chicago and his relationships with other black nationalists, separatists, Communists and radicals. He is really running two races, one for delegates and one for credibility.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.