missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Anonymous (not verified) says:
I agree, thats deff not more important than prostitutes or past drug use.
Where I disagree is that it shouldn't be up to the NY Times, Good Government Groups, or the media in general to bring these thing public; it should have been our legislators. This decision was stolen from Finance in the first place. And where we Finance Committee Members or even the ever so opposed Chair? NOWHERE. Not a peep, even from the Chair. Spineless and a stupid move all around. Whether or not you are for or against congestion pricing, voters will remember if you had a backbone during this issue- especially when the topic is half your campaign pitch.
I agree, thats deff not more important than prostitutes or past drug use.
Where I disagree is that it shouldn't be up to the NY Times, Good Government Groups, or the media in general to bring these thing public; it should have been our legislators. This decision was stolen from Finance in the first place. And where we Finance Committee Members or even the ever so opposed Chair? NOWHERE. Not a peep, even from the Chair. Spineless and a stupid move all around. Whether or not you are for or against congestion pricing, voters will remember if you had a backbone during this issue- especially when the topic is half your campaign pitch.