missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Amalie (not verified) says:
I agree. I don't think it's unreasonable to take the way a candidate runs his/her presidential campaign as a glimpse into the way the candidate might approach running the country, and if Clinton's performance on the former is any indication of how she'd do the latter, I believe I'll say no thanks. Surrounding herself with an impenetrable cadre of incompetent loyals, failing to recognize that her primary strategy isn't working and a different approach is required, doggedly repeating talking points that have no basis in fact -- not only does it sound like a recipe for disaster, but it also sounds like what we've been putting up with for the past eight years.
I agree. I don't think it's unreasonable to take the way a candidate runs his/her presidential campaign as a glimpse into the way the candidate might approach running the country, and if Clinton's performance on the former is any indication of how she'd do the latter, I believe I'll say no thanks. Surrounding herself with an impenetrable cadre of incompetent loyals, failing to recognize that her primary strategy isn't working and a different approach is required, doggedly repeating talking points that have no basis in fact -- not only does it sound like a recipe for disaster, but it also sounds like what we've been putting up with for the past eight years.