missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
...question for the Superdelegates... (not verified) says:
.
The question for Democratic superdelegates is: “Do we want the ‘Clinton Three- Ring Circus’ back on the White House lawn?”
Hillary’s 2008 presidential campaign has always been about the Clintons’ own self-interests. Hillary has deliberately tried to undermine Obama’s electability in the general election, knowing that could be disastrous for the Democrats in November. She has engaged in what can be described as the ‘kamikaze’ strategy - (‘I’ll destroy Obama before I’ll let him win!’) The Clintons, as a pair, as a two-fer, have an inherently self-destructive personality.
Hillary started her campaign believing she was headed for a coronation; a sense of entitlement that screamed “I deserve to be president.” For all her claims of experience, her presidential campaign has been an unmitigated failure. And when things have gone wrong, often as a result of the Clintons’ own doing, staff and surrogates have been thrown under the bus.
Hillary’s chronic problem is how she is viewed by the majority of voters; her ratings for honesty, favorability and trustworthiness are in a steady decline. A recent AP poll finds that a “clear majority.voters now say Obama has the better chance of defeating” John McCain. It may be that more Democrats are voting ‘against’ Hillary --- than are voting ‘for’ Obama.
Her campaign has given us insight into what a Hillary Presidency would be like: half-truths, outright lies, demonizing of opponents, an endless psychodrama and a president, who when politically wounded, would whine and wallow in self-pity of victimhood. Her repugnant presidential campaign, which is headed for imminent defeat, is the second major disaster over which Hillary has presided, ‘Hillarycare’ being the first.
.
The question for Democratic superdelegates is: “Do we want the ‘Clinton Three- Ring Circus’ back on the White House lawn?”
Hillary’s 2008 presidential campaign has always been about the Clintons’ own self-interests. Hillary has deliberately tried to undermine Obama’s electability in the general election, knowing that could be disastrous for the Democrats in November. She has engaged in what can be described as the ‘kamikaze’ strategy - (‘I’ll destroy Obama before I’ll let him win!’) The Clintons, as a pair, as a two-fer, have an inherently self-destructive personality.
Hillary started her campaign believing she was headed for a coronation; a sense of entitlement that screamed “I deserve to be president.” For all her claims of experience, her presidential campaign has been an unmitigated failure. And when things have gone wrong, often as a result of the Clintons’ own doing, staff and surrogates have been thrown under the bus.
Hillary’s chronic problem is how she is viewed by the majority of voters; her ratings for honesty, favorability and trustworthiness are in a steady decline. A recent AP poll finds that a “clear majority.voters now say Obama has the better chance of defeating” John McCain. It may be that more Democrats are voting ‘against’ Hillary --- than are voting ‘for’ Obama.
Her campaign has given us insight into what a Hillary Presidency would be like: half-truths, outright lies, demonizing of opponents, an endless psychodrama and a president, who when politically wounded, would whine and wallow in self-pity of victimhood. Her repugnant presidential campaign, which is headed for imminent defeat, is the second major disaster over which Hillary has presided, ‘Hillarycare’ being the first.
---------------------------------------------------------