missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Kumar (not verified) says:
I still do not understand why DNC change the rule. Obama and Clinton both agreed with exclusion of Florida and Michigan before the contest. Why did not Hillary worry then about Florida and Michigan ? Why she did not worry about 50 states and 2.5 million participants? This looks hypocrtical or fraud. She should have protested when it was being done. Why blame Obama. He followed agreed upon rules. Clinton has name recognition and Obama as new comer needs to compaign to be known. Hillary agreed with DNc so that she could raise funds in these states.
Fair thing to do is to split it 50-50. Both states get a seat and it does not affect the results as it should be based on the rules agreed upon by Clinton and Obama.
I still do not understand why DNC change the rule. Obama and Clinton both agreed with exclusion of Florida and Michigan before the contest. Why did not Hillary worry then about Florida and Michigan ? Why she did not worry about 50 states and 2.5 million participants? This looks hypocrtical or fraud. She should have protested when it was being done. Why blame Obama. He followed agreed upon rules. Clinton has name recognition and Obama as new comer needs to compaign to be known. Hillary agreed with DNc so that she could raise funds in these states.
Fair thing to do is to split it 50-50. Both states get a seat and it does not affect the results as it should be based on the rules agreed upon by Clinton and Obama.