The previous poster's (anonymous) comment is ludicrous. I don't know who wrote it, or what their agenda is, but it is highly insulting to the members of VRDC and CODA, who work hard to preserve their communities and are constantly fighting real estate developers, whether its landlords raising rent, or development projects being permitted to run rampant over our downtown neighborhoods.
If you've met Luke on the street, or, for that matter, read his website at all, it is readily apparent that he is a progressive Democrat, and exactly what the 64th AD needs. His support for Clean Money Clean Elections reform is a terrific example of that.
The previous poster's (anonymous) comment is ludicrous. I don't know who wrote it, or what their agenda is, but it is highly insulting to the members of VRDC and CODA, who work hard to preserve their communities and are constantly fighting real estate developers, whether its landlords raising rent, or development projects being permitted to run rampant over our downtown neighborhoods.
If you've met Luke on the street, or, for that matter, read his website at all, it is readily apparent that he is a progressive Democrat, and exactly what the 64th AD needs. His support for Clean Money Clean Elections reform is a terrific example of that.