Jess Loren (not verified) says:

Barack Obama stepped a little further to the right this week when he told a Christian magazine that he does not support late term abortions in all cases of health of the mother. Only "serious physical issues". But Naral, who is still feeling the blowback from their controversial decision to endorse Obama over Hillary Clinton 3 weeks before the end of the primary, defended him in an absolutely unconscionable way. They refused to criticize his stance, and didn't point out that it conflicts with both Doe v. Bolton, and Naral's own official stance that "a health exception must also account for the mental health problems that may occur from pregnancy." Naral only said that "it does not conflict with roe v. wade, and that he dissagrees with Bush's federal ban". Naral made the decision to cover their tracks rather than educate women. Naral is no longer credible.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.