Mike: Dubai Was "Cheapest Political Shot"

Mke Bloomberg, evidently, doesn't have a particularly high opinion of Chuck Schumer's signature takedown of the Bush White House over the Dubai port deal.

Here's a fuller transcript from the Mayor's office (an earlier version had a rough transcript):

Mayor: I mean, come on. This is the cheapest political shot in the world. Everybody's rushing to say, ‘our ports.' It isn't like this hasn't been brewing for two decades. We have given up control of international ship transport. America has become a virtual non-entity. We don't run ports around the world, we don't run our own ports, we don't have American shipping carrying this. That was long ago given away and they're just discovering this? We do have security risks. I'm sympathetic to that. What I don't like is all of the sudden it becomes the issue de jour and everybody's rushing up there waving the flag, beating their chests saying ‘I'm trying to defend this country better than others.' What about funding the Coast Guard for the last couple of decades?

Asked to respond at a press conference today, Chuck was icy:

"I've talked to him three times this week," he said. "He didn't mention it once."

Full transcript after the jump.

Gambling: Alright. The Dubai situation, you know it's the top story, the DPW group has thrown in the towel. They're going to transfer to an American corporation, the management thereof. All of this conversation over the last three and a half weeks has opened up the issue of general port security, looking at-

Mayor: John, John, where were these people for the last few decades?

Gambling: Well of course.

Mayor: I mean, come on. This is the cheapest political shot in the world. Everybody's rushing to say, ‘our ports.' It isn't like this hasn't been brewing for two decades. We have given up control of international ship transport. America has become a virtual non-entity. We don't run ports around the world, we don't run our own ports, we don't have American shipping carrying this. That was long ago given away and they're just discovering this? We do have security risks. I'm sympathetic to that. What I don't like is all of the sudden it becomes the issue de jour and everybody's rushing up there waving the flag, beating their chests saying ‘I'm trying to defend this country better than others.' What about funding the Coast Guard for the last couple of decades?

Gambling: Well that's the point that's-

Mayor: Where the heck have these guys been? The Coast Guard is an under-funded agency that we depend on to protect this country, and we didn't rush to give the Coast Guard more money after 9/11 and you didn't have to wait for 9/11. There was a terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in '93. Nobody rushed to defend the Coast Guard then. We've had- we all complain about drugs coming into this country by boat but we don't give the Coast Guard the money to go do that. We complain about our ports being open to everybody. It's the Coast Guard that's going- it's the first line of defense. I mean, so, you know, I'm a little bit- my eyes roll when I listen to all of this. It's easy to have a political speech, but you've got to do something and you've got to fund it, and you've got to fund it every single year. The Coast Guard, I don't know if it's well-run or poorly-run- I hope it's well run. But they need to have money every year, they need to have modern equipment, they need to know that the government and the people are behind them and that they can hire people for the long term and invest and make the kind of investments to provide the security that we need-

Gambling: And for the last 45 years-

Mayor: And that doesn't get you a press conference, it doesn't get you the front page or an editorial, but it even costs you money. You've got to go to the public and say ‘hey, your taxes are going up because we're doing this.' But that's what we need.

Gambling: The last 25 years the Coast Guard has- it's budget has been cut and cut and cut, and they've been closing Coast Guard stations all around the United States. And- you answered my question. How do you feel about port security in the true security question, not the politics...

Mayor: There are-

Gambling: of the who's running...

Mayor: That is one of the big issues here. Another big issue is we live in an international world and we just have to accept that. American jobs depend on trade. America's economy depends on trade, whether it's people coming here to work- there's this whole immigration issue which is tied up and everybody's on both sides of every single part of it- or whether it is foreign investment here and when we want to make investments overseas. We just have to have intelligent, well-thought-out policies, and you don't do that when there's one story that is dominating the news, and the press everyday demands to be fed another hot line so they can have a headline. If Congress is going- and Congress is the one here that to me is the one that's responsible for all of this, or the administration in Washington, together, I think, in all fairness- and it's not Republican, it's not Democrat, it's not this President or the last President, it's all- both parties, it's all of our leaders. When things aren't in the press- when things are going well, that's the time to sit down and come up with an intelligent policy, make the long term investments you need, build for the future, put the structures in place. It doesn't win you any points. It costs you money and maybe the public doesn't like it. But that's what leadership is all about and, you know, whether it's the administration or Congress- whether it's at the Federal level or the State level or the local level- come on, let's get serious here. Reacting to one contract deal- whether the Dubai deal was a good deal or a bad deal, I don't have- you can hear people- this, supposedly, company does pretty well. Is it a real issue? I am concerned about our ports, but you can't just go and look at one contract one time. Where have they been?

Gambling: New York City police have a rather, well not significant, but they have a role in port security-

Mayor: We have a thousand- John, we have a thousand people invested in counterterrorism insurance. We did it after 9/11 when I came into office and we do it every single day, and we don't-

Gambling: How about in the ports- marine. Do we need more marine or do we just have to strengthen the Coast Guard?

Mayor: It's the Coast Guard and customs that provide security, and remember, most of New York City's port is really in New Jersey and there's a Port Authority, and a Port Authority Police. There's a - I think there's another police department for the harbor. Then there is the Federal government. The NYPD really provides security on the streets of the city and the subways and our schools; those are the things that we do, and we have a long-term, well-thought-out plan which hopefully will pay dividends for the city, and to some extent it's one of these things if we don't get attacked you don't know if it was because we did the right thing or not, but we're going to make this investment. I'm not going to just rush and try to answer the editorial of the day demanding this, that, or the other thing. Ray Kelly has- and all of the people that work in the NYPD have really thought about what we need. We've made the investments, we continue to make the investments, we're going to make more investment, and we're going to do it consistently, and that's good government. That's what we're supposed to be doing, and it's not been done, particularly with the Coast Guard which is- comes to mind because of the ports. But for example, the same thing is true at the airports. Just remember, I think it was from Boston, both the planes that took out the World Trade Center. Where was the security? Why did that fail? Because we go and we make an investment one day; we say ‘oh, we're going to have guards.' And then they don't have trained guards- maybe they don't pay them enough to get the best people, or they have rules where if you don't do a good job they can't get rid of them or, you know- and then we go to the other direction. All of the sudden we're so craziness. A friend of mine went through security, they took away a manicure scissors, okay-

Gambling: Oh that happens to me all the time.

Mayor: Goes down the thing and you can buy manicure scissors on the other side of security,

LAUGHTER

Gambling: I remember having- by the way when I used to smoke, I stopped smoking- but- and I had matches and a lighter, and they said ‘I'm sorry sir, I'm going to have to take the matches from you.' But they let me keep the lighter. Now you can't do that. They won't let you keep the lighter, all lighters are off the...

Mayor: They should take away your cigarettes actually. And you saw the good news about smoking in the city- Gambling: I've got this on the list. Yeah.

Mayor: We'll talk about it. This is a very big deal.

Gambling: Okay, we'll talk about it when we come back. Let's take our half hour break right here with Mayor Michael Bloomberg at 77 WABC.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Harry (not verified) says:

When is Schumer ever not icy?

cnyguy (not verified) says:

Chuck should keep his eye on the ball - in Fulton, NY uphere in upstate, he was everywhere pushing an ivory coast company to come here and set up a chocolate factory. They did come, never paid the bill, and now are going bankrupt. Where is Chuck now huh?

anon (not verified) says:

ben, you got it wrong. the mayor's not talking about chuck. chuck has been leading the charge for years trying to get more money for port security. i think mike is blasting the johnny-come-lately's (namely, almost every single House Republican) who voted down port security funding but now feign outrage.

Bubba (not verified) says:

Maybe Bloomberg wants to sell his company to the UAE and Dubai folks.

Bouldin (not verified) says:

The funny thing is that the White House said much the same thing about Bloomie back in the 2005 campaign when he voiced his conveniently-timed misgivings about John Roberts.

Anonymous says:

Maybe he's getting ready to fire Iris.

Yoda (not verified) says:

Chuck supported foreigners from the Ivory Coast taking over a vital American resouces like chocalote! Oh my god!

Cranky Independent (not verified) says:

Every now and then, Bloomberg forgets he is a pol and stops pandering to emotional reactions and narrow selfish interests.

Saw a lot of that the first two years, much less the last two. I'd like to see it more. There are many more truths that can be told.

There may be issues here, but a lot of it was competitive Arab bashing, which is shameful.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

"Arab bashing" to be concerned about a nation that aided the 9/11 terrorists? Hello?

Gatemouth (not verified) says:

Lenin once said the capalists will sell us the rope we hang them with. Communism is no longer a threat to our national security, so they had to find a new market.

Anonymous says:

The Sheiks from Dubai should run the Staten Island Ferry, they can't do any worse than Iris.

anon-sailor (not verified) says:

As a sailor and observer of the marine industry in addition to politics, Mike is spot on with his comments regarding the Coast Guard. They are one of the most vital organizations when it comes to homeland security and they get zero respect. They were in New Orleans saving lives as soon as the winds got low enough for the helicopters to fly, they'll also be there when your boat begins to sink.

doobie brother (not verified) says:

Isn't the council publ;ic safety committee holding a hearing on this later this month. Maybe the council will get the idea right and actually speak to the coast guard so they can the facts right. I heard Public Saftey has this issue, not sure how it affects Peter Jrs. race for Queens DA?

anon (not verified) says:

I'm so disillusioned. You mean to tell me this wasn't a fight over substance, that it was just. . . don't say it . . . political?

The only question is how W, Mr. national security himself, came out--and continues to come out--on the wrong side. He has lost credibility on the only issue he had left.

Cranky Independent (not verified) says:

("Arab bashing" to be concerned about a nation that aided the 9/11 terrorists? Hello?)

After Beslan, I heard a shamed Arab intellectual admit that while most Arabs are not terrorists, most current terrorists are Arabs.

People need to remember the reverse as well.

Bubba (not verified) says:

Finally, someone who can make me like Chuck Schumer. C'mon Chuck kick his spoiled Boston behind back to beantown.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

I think Mayor Mike is mostly right! Everything has gone international these days. Have you ever tried to buy an American made product? Are there any left?

Bubba (not verified) says:

It's a bad week for Stu Loeser: First it's revealed his boss is not Skyler but some rap-singing former secretary to Skyler; then his wife's boss Shelly Silver kicks the mayor's butt all over manhattan; and now Bloomberg and his former boss, Senator Schumer get into a tiff. Maybe it's time to find a boss with some principles and decency.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Cranky, The concern is about a nation that actually aided the 9/11 terrorists. You should remember that.

Nicolo Macchiavelli (not verified) says:

There is a lot of pent-up Nationalism. The Republicans and the Rightis Dems have mined it since 911. Now it is biting them in the ass. Half of it is 911 but only half, the other half is NAFTA and the trade deficit. Bush promised that by cutting taxes (raising the other deficit, the budget deficit) the trade deficit and the end of manufacturing in the US wouldn't matter. Maybe he was expecting lots of oil to flow and keep the price very low, who knows, it didn't work, budget and trade deficits are accelerating. Blame someone else, don't tax oil or rich peoples children's inheritence. God forbid.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

11:43 - Terrorists are bad. Putting your head in the sand about terrorism is dangerously stupid. Do you think that it is somehow cool to side with terrorists? Try explaining how cool and blameless you think terrorists are to the children who are growing up without the parents who went to work to take care of them on 9/11.

Anonymous says:

In this country we like to define terrorism as "arab"... many veils would be lifted if we poted to look at daily events a lot more objectively and intelligently.

Anonymous says:

In this country we like to define terrorism as "arab"... many veils would be lifted if we opted to look at daily events a lot more objectively and intelligently.

Anonymous says:

I agree with Nicolo Machiavelli, i think he's right on target. Arab and other foreign investments in the US economy are essential to our current standard of living. A decline in foreign investment would be catastrophic to our economy, and though i hate to say it, Bush's people seem to understand they need to keep foreign investors happy. The risk of not doing so would result in placing at risk the dollar's paramount position in international reserves, which would force our economy into a major debt crisis (it already is).

Over the last decade or so, our collective debt has grown much faster than our collective income (i.e. our GDP has grown by 64% while our foreign debt has grown by 257%). Our foreign lenders may at some point realize that we'll never be able to pay back our debt.

How is the port deal relevant to our economy? see http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/index.html

Nicolo Macchiavelli (not verified) says:

Debt drives the economy. No one mentions Keynes anymore nor his greatest work. Maybe the title was too boring or wonkish. I think it was "General Theory of Wages and Prices"? But Keynes rules the economic reality of Reaganomics. Even the "Conservatives" say that Reagan taught them that debt didn't matter. They use it to bash government and know that no one will vote to raise taxes ever, even if it makes sense. The last one that did was George Bush the 1st. And the "Liberal" Clinton bashed him for it, remember "read my lips". However, when the deficit fell subsequently in the Clinton years who took the credit and benefit of lower interest rates? Clinton and Rubin. Still total indebtedness rises in the long run, credit cards, mortgages, bonds, unfunded pensions. And, as Keynes said "in the long run, we're all dead."

Anonymous (not verified) says:

9:20 It is not this country defining Arabs as terrorists, it is Arab terrorists defining Arabs as terrorists.

Doing business with terrorist states is the most dangerous kind of opportunism. Those countries fund the very terrorists who have attacked us and will attack us again. They will even attack those who think that they are just swell - - and their children.

Those who have condemned Bush for getting Osama's family out of the U.S. right after 9/11 should try and remember why they thought that was wrong.

If the Democratic Party (of which I am a member) is going to define iself as the party that feels for terrorists and doesn't want anyone picking on them, it will not matter how many mistakes the Republicans make - Democrats will remain out of power. That is why Republicans have abandoned Bush on this one.

Anonymous says:

c'mmon. israel has had its share of terrorists too.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

9:50 - There is no moral equivalency between terrorists and the nation founded by Holocaust survivors that defends itself against them. Israelis do not strap suicide belts to their children and teach them to blow up other peoples' children. Your comment is the kind of grotesque perversion of reality that reveals how badly off track the Democratic Party has gotten. Siding with terrorists and latching onto indefensible claims of moral equivalence will only ensure that the Party will be seen as hopelessly extreme and unfit to hold power.

Anonymous says:

Hey, Bloomie finally started straight-talking again. Nice. Can you imagine what poor, stupid Freddy Ferrer would have said?

To all the people saying Dubai is a terror-state, I wonder if you had ever even heard of it before three weeks ago. You don't seem to know what you're talking about, because it's our most stalwart ally in the region. Plus it's just a fabulous place to visit, with great nightlife, etc. Both the US and UK have more terrorism within their borders than Dubai does. God, get a clue.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Oh sure, 11;10. All of our staunch allies help terrorists, particularly the ones who attacked us on 9/11. BTW the terrorism we need to be concened about is not within their borders, its the kind of terrorism it sends over here - - like the two 9/11 hijackers it assisted. You enjoy the night life there? That's kind of an unusual defense of a nation that is known to have terrorist ties. It sounds like it just may speak volumes about where you're coming from.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.