The Morning Read: Monday, December 11, 2006

New York magazine looks at Alan Hevesi and his complicated personal situation.

At the same time, Hevesi may benefit from a legal argument written by a Republican state Senator.

Time magazine says, "By trying to become the perfect candidate for the primaries, McCain could be creating difficulties for himself in a general election."

Adam Nagourney wondered over the weekend if America is "more likely to vote for a woman or an African-American for president."

George Pataki will decide whether to run for president next year.

Eliot Spitzer's mettle may be tested over the issue of raising salaries for state lawmakers.

New York Times editors like the idea of studying congestion pricing.

The Sun editors are weary of the lame-duck session of the legislature.

Ben looks inside Barack Obama's meeting with George Soros and other high-end contributors.

And there's a new cover photo and introduction to Hillary's book, It Takes a Village.

-- Azi Paybarah
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

d (not verified) says:

"Some political analysts say they think the country may accept a woman as president. But they are less sure about an African-American, even one as popular as Barack Obama."

Why do journalists, in trying to be unbiased, present such things as if they're okay? Why not just say it like it is -- more Americans are racist than are sexist.

Father (not verified) says:

you left out the continuing effort by the Post to villify Sheldon Silver because he is an Orthodox Jew. Today they accuse him of being treated as a VIP -- even though he pays for his own tickets to Rangers hockey games and they make sure to include a photo of Silver with his Black hat on his head to try and create a negative impression.

Last week he was the Orthodox Jew who loves pork... even though it's legal and been part of governing for leaders of legilsative bodies since there were legislative bodies. Of course, the Post hasn't given a fraction of the space and certainly no lead editorial to Joe Bruno's use of pork to a for-profit company with no human or social service outcomes.

Since the buck has to stop with Rupert Murdoch, not just his editors, I can only conclude that Murdoch is an anti-semite and anti-religious Jews.

Funny because he is always making believe how pro-family he and his companies are. Except in real life, Murdoch's papers are filled with pictures of women without underwear and practically nude or inebriated sisters; and in his personal life he abandons his wife of decades for a younger Asian woman. I feal there are no principles in the man.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.