What (Not) to Make of 600,000 Deaths in Iraq

A study by public-health researchers at Johns Hopkins says that estimates of deaths in Iraq since we did that nation the great service of bringing them democracy are way low, that the likelihood is 600,000 have died. Though they say the number could be as low as 400,000 and as high as 800,000.

The study suggests once again that we have little idea what's going on in Iraq. Yesterday Gen. George Casey Jr., the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, said he doesn't imagine the death toll is higher than 55,000. That's a tenfold difference, between 55,000 and 600,000. But not a controversy in the papers. What if people on the Upper East Side said they thought 20 people, not two, had died in the Corey Lidle plane crash yesterday, wouldn't the discrepancy be in the headlines?

I wonder if the press's general indifference on this study doesn't reflect its inhibitions about describing the Iraq war: if we come out and call it a disaster, then there will have to be major consequences domestically, and we're not ready for that. Too many important people are implicated.

Even more significant, as the writer Dan Swanson points out, the argument against withdrawing completely has been that U.S. forces are all that's preventing a bloodbath. These figures suggest that that argument is an imperial vanity.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

mr_dude (not verified) says:

If they use the same method for the WTC event on 9/11, then there would be no more than 200-300 deaths on that day.

gigithesemite (not verified) says:

Mr. Weiss, it's almost like poetry the way you put words together. I just discovered you, thanks to my sister who lives in Brooklyn.
As for 600,000 Iraqi deaths...add to that the half million who died due to economic sanctions between this war and the Gulf war, then add to that the numbers who died in that war, and you could call it genocide. 55,000 is genocide. Iraqis never attacked the US. But we are all so de-sensitized by the sanitized news. We don't care...they're a bunch of Arabs. What an Anti-Semitic attitude. Because as everybody knows, Arabs are Semitic. Right? But back to de-sensitivity, we get more violence and blood lust on fictional TV than in real life news. This unconscienable war is the only subject that is not a reality TV show. And though I believe the neocons and the Israel lobby had a strong hand in pushing for the Iraq war, there are also other corporate interests that were salivating to start this war..hugely profiting them. And they hold no allegiance to countries or ethnicities or religions. Or decency. Thank you for your honesty.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.