<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; The White House</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Times Corrects Yesterday&#039;s Disputed Subhed</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/times-corrects-yesterdays-disputed-subhed</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>The Times</em> today published <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/pageoneplus/corrections.html">a correction</a> to yesterday's <a href="/2007/white-house-house-takes-times">disputed sub-hed</a>:<br />
<blockquote>The subheading with a front-page headline on Wednesday for an article about discussions between four top White House lawyers and the Central Intelligence Agency over whether to destroy videotapes showing secret interrogations of members of Al Qaeda referred imprecisely to the White House’s position thus far on the matter. While Bush administration officials have acknowledged some discussions leading up to the destruction of the tapes in November 2005, as the article noted, the White House itself has not officially said anything on the subject, so its role was not &quot;wider than it said.&quot; <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/times-corrects-yesterdays-disputed-subhed">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/times-corrects-yesterdays-disputed-subhed#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266">The White House</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:30:48 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zachary Roth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62305 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> White House Takes on The Times</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/white-house-house-takes-times</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It's been a while since we've had a good Bush-administration-vs.-<em>New</em>-<em>York</em>-<em>Times</em> flare-up. But today the White House took the unusual step of <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071219/pl_afp/usciatorturewhousemedia;_ylt=AgbcpnVvYvWgn5Uzo0oekjqs0NUE">issuing a public statement</a> demanding that <em>The Times</em> retract the subhed to a front-page story in today's paper.
<p><em>The Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/19/washington/19cnd-cia.html?_r=1&amp;ref=washington&amp;oref=slogin">reported</a> today that four White House lawyers were more involved than had previously been acknowledged in the CIA's destruction of interrogation tapes.  The story's subhed read: &quot;White House Role Was Wider Than It Said.&quot; <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/white-house-house-takes-times">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/white-house-house-takes-times#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52380">Dana Perino</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266">The White House</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:36:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zachary Roth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62286 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dan Rather Sues CBS for $70 Million</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/dan-rather-sues-cbs-70-million</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>From <em>The Times&#39;</em> Jacques Steinberg:<br />
<blockquote>
<p>Mr. Rather, 75, asserts that the network violated his contract by giving him insufficient airtime on “60 Minutes” after forcing him to step down as anchor of the “CBS Evening News” in March 2005. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/dan-rather-sues-cbs-70-million">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/dan-rather-sues-cbs-70-million#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/dan-rather">Dan Rather</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266">The White House</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:25:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">58065 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bedtime for Gonzo</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/bedtime-gonzo</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>'Where's Ed Levi now that we need him?' <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/bedtime-gonzo">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/bedtime-gonzo#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27651">Alberto Gonzales</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50521">George W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266">The White House</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24724">U.S. Department of Justice</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:30:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Lehmann</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57267 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CBS&#039; &#039;Rude Little Liberal&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/cbs-rude-little-liberal</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>On Monday morning, Karl Rove stood next to President George W. Bush on the South Lawn of the White House and announced that he would be resigning from the administration at the end of the month. In front of the assembled D.C. press corp, he read a statement, and the President spoke. There was no formal opportunity for questions.</p>
<p>Towards the end of the appearance, as the President and his favorite pol were about to head in the direction of an awaiting helicopter, Bill Plante, CBS White House correspondent, broke the embargo.</p>
<p class="western">“If he’s so smart,” said Mr. Plante, “how come you lost Congress?” <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/cbs-rude-little-liberal">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/cbs-rude-little-liberal#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50519">Bill Plante</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50521">George W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24462">Karl Rove</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266">The White House</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:11:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56858 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Libby at Liberty!</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/libby-liberty</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Commutations come with quite explicit guidelines of their own – promulgated by the department of Justice back in the days before it became a Rove-branded house of patronage and prosecutions to solidify G.O.P. tactics of voter suppression. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/libby-liberty">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/libby-liberty#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-w-bush">George W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50320">Scooter Libby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266">The White House</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28406">Valerie Plame</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:06:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Lehmann</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">55673 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Portman&#039;s Prospects</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/portmans-prospects</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Rob Portman announced his resignation as President Bush&#39;s budget director today, which set off speculation that the 51-year-old Ohioan is preparing to re-enter electoral politics. Portman served six-terms as the representative of the Cincinnati area before joining the administration in 2005, and according to the AP&#39;s <a href="http://http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19311616/">write-up</a> he made it clear today that he is considering a future bid for Governor or the U.S. Senate.</p>
<p>So which will it be and what are his chances? <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/portmans-prospects">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/portmans-prospects#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50259">Rob Portman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266">The White House</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24572">U.S. House of Representatives</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24313">U.S. Senate</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:50:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">55292 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bloomberg and the 2008 Money Race</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/31973</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->I tried asking Mike Bloomberg if the record-breaking fund-raising by some of the 2008 White House candidates makes it easier to use nationally the message he employed in the 2005 mayoral race: that a self-financed candidate isn't beholden to campaign contributors.

<p>After saying he's not running, Bloomberg offered this gem: a pre-emptive argument that anybody can raise money if they have good ideas.</p>

<blockquote><p>"I think also it's fascinating, there's no evidence that you can't raise a lot of money if the public likes you. Take a look at Howard Dean over the internet foru years ago. It was, all of a sudden, an enormous amount of money. Barack Obama, you know, six months ago, wasn't on the radar screen. Today, he can raise an enormous amount of money. So, the ability to raise money is there if you have good ideas--ideas that some people think are good."</p></blockquote>

<p>Which is an argument a self-financed candidate may need to trot out in order to fend off accusations he's buying a campaign.</p>

<em>-- Azi Paybarah</em>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/31973#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24396">Howard Dean</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/michael-bloomberg">Michael Bloomberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266">The White House</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:27:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31973 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sharpton on 2008</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/31972</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/XGoCexS-Y0Y"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/XGoCexS-Y0Y" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

<p>Al Sharpton has some news for the Democratic White House candidates coming to his <a href="http://www.nationalactionnetwork.net/html/upcoming_events.html">April 18-21 forum</a>: he may criticize you, but that doesn't mean he won't endorse you.</p>

Above, from an interview over the weekend, he explains to me how his 2008 endorsement decision is really all about his constituency, not him.

<em>-- Azi Paybarah</em>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/31972#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24248">Al Sharpton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266">The White House</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31972 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bloomberg&#039;s Independent Competition for 2008</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/31965</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Take note Kevin Sheekey. Mike Bloomberg isn't the only independent businessman looking to run for president.

<a href="http://www.thepeoplespresident2008.com/president/">Daniel Imperato</a>, a businessman and self-described "man of the globe" will be speaking to the <a href="http://www.manhattanlp.org/">Manhattan Libertarian Party</a> (at 140 2nd Avenue around 7:30 p.m.) about his presidential bid.

<blockquote><p>"Being a man of the globe, and understanding the people, I felt that I should at least consider helping the United States and the world make a change by possibly throwing my hat into the ring for the White House in 2008."</p></blockquote>

<em>-- Azi Paybarah</em>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/31965#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27698">Daniel Imperato</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24532">Kevin Sheekey</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/michael-bloomberg">Michael Bloomberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266">The White House</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 00:32:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31965 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
