<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; John Whitehead</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25077/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Putting on the Spitz: Eliot&#039;s Brain Trust</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/52515</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->When State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer sat down to breakfast with storied financial consultant Fe <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/52515">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/52515#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30700">Felix Rohatyn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24983">Harry Siegel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25077">John Whitehead</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30232">Robert Yaro</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">52515 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Putting on the Spitz: Eliot’s Brain Trust</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/39230</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->When State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer sat down to breakfast with storied financial consultant Fe <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/39230">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/39230#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30700">Felix Rohatyn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24983">Harry Siegel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25077">John Whitehead</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30232">Robert Yaro</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">39230 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Spitzer v. Whitehead, II</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/35009</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Remember the Eliot Spitzer-John Whitehead pissing match that was all that was all over the<a href="http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/63154.htm"> <em>New York Post </em>just three months ago</a>?  Spitzer apparently apologized (sort of), at least to the businessmen who gathered in Felix Rohatyn's living room. In this week's <em>Observer</em>, Jason Horowitz relates <a href="http://www.observer.com/20060807/20060807_Jason_Horowitz_pageone_newsstory1.asp ">the conversation</a>:

<blockquote> "There was this big controversy with John Whitehead. He took it, he explained it, tried to explain," said Mr. Rohatyn, adding, "He understood that he'd made a mistake and we went on."</blockquote>

-<em>Matthew Schuerman</em>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/35009#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30700">Felix Rohatyn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25051">Jason Horowitz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25077">John Whitehead</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:18:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">35009 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Whitehead: &quot;More Advanced Age to Enjoy&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/34721</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->The 84-year-old John Whitehead, a World War II veteran and former Goldman Sachs head, resigned as chairman of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation and of the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation. 

<p>"Four-and-a-half years is a long time for a supposedly retired person of advanced age and I hope to have more advanced age to enjoy," he said at a meeting this morning.</p>

The Governor and Mayor will choose his successor at the L.M.D.C. At the foundation, <em>The Times </em>said this morning that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/11/nyregion/11cnd-resign.html">Thomas Johnson, now chairman of the executive committee who already took over many administrative duties, would succeed him</a>. Foundation spokeswoman Lynn Rasic would not confirm that, saying that the full foundation board would vote on the new chairman at the next board meeting, scheduled for July.

-<em>Matthew Schuerman</em>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/34721#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24640">Goldman Sachs Group Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25077">John Whitehead</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26336">Lower Manhattan Development Corporation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26477">World Trade Center Memorial Foundation</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 11:42:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">34721 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>O&#039;Donnell and Whitehead, Cont&#039;d</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/28447</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div>I still don't have a clear explanation as to <a href="http://www.observer.com/thepoliticker/2006/01/exclusive-whiteheads-candidate.html">why Spitzer foe John Whitehead gave $10,000</a> to a Democrat, Denise O'Donnell, promising to "make sure that we continue the Elliot Spitzer tradition of strong, professional and non-political leadership in the Attorney General's office."

<p>But O'Donnell's campaign manager (and son) Jack offered a partial explanation. The two were introduced, he said, by fund-raiser Robin Duke. They actually "argued" about Spitzer, with O'Donnell defending him</p>

"She said that just because things were tolerated for years doesn't mean they aren't crimes," he said.

Then Whitehead amiably promised a check; the campaign was surprised by the $5,000 sum, and then by another, unsolicited $5,000 from Whitehead that floated in several weeks later.<div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/28447#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25697">Denise O&amp;#039;Donnell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/eliot-spitzer">Eliot Spitzer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25077">John Whitehead</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:51:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28447 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re-enter Gehry</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/34084</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div><a href="http://therealestate.observer.com/uploaded_images/gehry1-791736.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://therealestate.observer.com/uploaded_images/gehry1-790035.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>
The ultimate beneficiary of Governor Pataki&#8217;s $80 million gesture to Ground Zero seems to be Frank Gehry&#8217;s performing arts center, which had been put on the back burner because of its enormous price tag (<a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F70714FD39580C768DDDAA0894DD404482">rumored at more than $400 million</a>). 

<p>John Whitehead, the chairman of both the <a href="http://www.renewnyc.com/">Lower Manhattan Development Corporation</a> and <a href="http://www.buildthememorial.org/site/PageServer?pagename=homepage2 ">the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation</a>, said today, &#8220;The foundation will continue its capital campaign to raise $500 million. The excess of that will go to the performing arts center. And now the governor has announced that he will pay the cost of the Snohetta building, which would have had to come out of our total.&#8221;</p>

Previously, <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0A17FC3D550C708EDDA80994DD404482">it was awfully vague just how much the Gehry building would have received of the $800 million that the memorial foundation hopes to raise from private sources and the L.M.D.C.</a> Presumably, after the memorial, memorial museum, the Snohetta, and an operating endowment, not a whole lot. Instead, the performing arts center was to be left to &#8220;a second phase&#8221; (a.k.a. never).

<p>So was Pataki&#8217;s announcement today a mea culpa for <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/09/28/wtc.rebuilding/">nixing the International Freedom Center</a>? Or was it a challenge to Mayor Bloomberg to contribute some dough from the city treasury?</p>

-<em>Matthew Schuerman</em><div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/34084#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26270">Frank Gehry</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25077">John Whitehead</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24265">Manhattan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24345">World Trade Center</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:04:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">34084 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Whitehead&#039;s Motives</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/28323</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div>Over on The Observer's <a href="http://www.observer.com/therealestate">Real Estate</a> site Matt Schuerman <a href="http://www.observer.com/therealestate/2005/12/all-in-timing.html">picked up a little dissonance</a> in John Whitehead's account of being threatened last spring by Eliot Spitzer.

<p>Whitehead's <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007713">explosive Wall Street Journal piece</a> was, Whitehead writes in the piece, occasioned by "rumors in the media" about his confrontation with Spitzer. Problem is, we can't find any such rumors in print.</p>

Of course, this is quibbling. There's nothing particularly dishonorable in what has to be presumed the actual motive behind Whitehead's timing: weakening his enemy at an important point in the electoral cycle.<div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/28323#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/eliot-spitzer">Eliot Spitzer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25077">John Whitehead</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24804">Matt Schuerman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 04:49:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28323 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>All in the Timing</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/34028</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div>What&#8217;s odd about state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer&#8217;s alleged threat to former Goldman Sachs Co-Chairman John Whitehead (&#8220;You will pay dearly for what you have done&#8221;) is how it ever came into the public eye. Whitehead wrote an op-ed in April denouncing Spitzer&#8217;s public prosecution of A.I.G. chief Hank Greenberg. Then the alleged threatening phone conversation took place. Eight months later, after Spitzer conceded his case against Greenberg was too weak to warrant criminal charges, and once rival Democrat Tom Suozzi emerged as Wall Street&#8217;s candidate of choice in next year&#8217;s gubernatorial election, <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110007713">Whitehead tells all</a>. The justification of going public, Whitehead writes, is that &#8220;there have been rumors in the media as to what happened next.&#8221;

<p>These &#8220;rumors&#8221; appear to be a single question in a December 19 interview on CNBC&#8217;s &#8220;Closing Bell&#8221; in which Maria Bartiromo asked Greenberg to confirm rumors whether Spitzer called Whitehead to say that &#8220;basically, he was upset that he wrote the op-ed supporting you.&#8221; Greenberg said he had heard that also but wouldn&#8217;t elaborate.</p>

But the Money Honey&#8217;s question was just as tame as earlier renditions of the phone call&#8212;so why did Whitehead speak now?<em> The New York Times</em> mentioned in a May 6 report that the Attorney General and Whitehead had a &#8220;frank discussion&#8221; after the column ran. And in an August 8 column in <em>The New York Sun</em>, Brian McGuire wrote that Spitzer &#8220;is said to have responded hotly." Spitzer&#8217;s spokesman was quoted as saying that his boss called Whitehead merely to ask where he had gotten his information.

<p>Whitehead is now the chairman of both the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation and the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation. The largest grant to the foundation announced so far--$25 million--came from the Starr Foundation, which Greenberg controls.</p>

We have a call in to Whitehead's office in case he can elaborate. Meanwhile, <em>The New York Post </em>reports that <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/12272005/news/regionalnews/60350.htm">Republicans have joined the pile-on</a> against Spitzer. 

-<em>Matthew Schuerman</em><div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/34028#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26268">CNBC Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/eliot-spitzer">Eliot Spitzer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29801">Hank Greenberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25077">John Whitehead</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:57:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">34028 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Melville Tricksters</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/27866</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div>The Newsday photo desk is developing a reputation for its sense of humor.

<p>Not long ago, the <a href="http://www.observer.com/thepoliticker/2005/08/charles-barron-in-fantasyland.html">paper's images suggested</a> that the eminent banker John Whitehead was running for an East New York City Council seat.</p>

And today, next to <a href="http://www.nynewsday.com/news/local/brooklyn/nyc-nycamp184474353oct18,0,2646826.story">this story</a> on page four, they seem to have gotten <a href="http://www.margaritalopez.com/">Margarita Lopez</a> mixed up with <a href="http://www.mlt2005.com/">Margarita Lopez Torres</a>. Understandable confusion...particularly if you're in Melville.<div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/27866#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25364">East New York City Council</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25077">John Whitehead</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27866 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Post Mortems</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/33888</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div>The Mayor adds:

<p>&#8220;Although I understand Governor Pataki&#8217;s decision, I am disappointed that we were not able to find a way to reconcile the freedoms we hold so dear with the sanctity of the site.&#8221;</p>

We are left wondering how it is that the Mayor considers the decision to be the Governor's alone--or rather, we don't really wonder, the Mayor's role in downtown planning was always advisory at best. But it is worth pointing out that just last week, the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation announced three meeeting to be held this week for public input.

<p>"Through these efforts we continue our open, public process," LMDC John Whitehead said in the <a href="http://www.renewnyc.com/displaynews.aspx?newsid=18e35b39-4178-45a2-92ef-15d69f4aa6d3">press release</a>.</p>

The press release continues: "The LMDC Board will use the public comments and feedback gathered through this public process to inform their discussions and determine how to proceed."

<p>The Mayor and Governor once had eight appointees each to the LMDC board, but over time, they failed to fill vacancies as they were created, and right now the Mayor is down to four, while the Governor has six. So even if the Mayor wanted to see the issue through another bloody week, and wanted an open vote when the LMDC next met Oct. 6, he would be outvoted. Of course, given the<a href="http://www.observer.com/pageone_newsstory1.asp"> Mayor's comments yesterday</a>, perhaps the Freedom Center felt outgunned anyway.</p>

Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.nypost.com"><em>The New York Post</em></a>, which has been championing the center's opponents, is the only major city daily not to have the story on its web site, since it uses only AP national feeds. But we expect there may be something in the paper tomorrow.<div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/33888#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25077">John Whitehead</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29767">LMDC Board</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26336">Lower Manhattan Development Corporation</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33888 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
