<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Nancy Pelosi</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Our Critic&#039;s Tip Sheet on Current Reading: Barack the Scrivener; Opaque Pelosi; Hilary Mantel in History&#039;s Kitchen</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/our-critics-tip-sheet-current-reading-barack-scrivener-opaque-pelosi-hilary-mantel</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Andrew Delbanco, the distinguished critic and biographer of Melville, gives Barack Obama two thumbs up in <em>The New Republic</em> (<a href="http://www.tnr.com" title="www.tnr.com">www.tnr.com</a>), explicitly allowing his favorable literary judgment on Mr. Obama’s two books to shade into a political endorsement (&quot;this man—to my ear, at least—is the real deal&quot;). It’s a strange, leapfrogging idea, to think that a politician’s prose opens a window into his heart. &quot;It is hard for any writer,&quot; says Mr. Delbanco, &quot;no matter how selective his memory or guarded his words, to conceal himself in his writing. I suspect (I’ve never met him) that the weaknesses and strengths of Obama’s writing reflect those of his character—a virtuosity that tempts him to be pleased with himself and impatient with others, but also an awareness of human complexity. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/our-critics-tip-sheet-current-reading-barack-scrivener-opaque-pelosi-hilary-mantel">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/our-critics-tip-sheet-current-reading-barack-scrivener-opaque-pelosi-hilary-mantel#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54802">Books</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:28:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adam Begley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71801 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Carrion Hosts McCain and Obama at Latino Conference</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/carrion-hosts-mccain-and-obama-latino-conference</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Adolfo Carrion will host Barack Obama and John McCain at a national conference of Latino elected officials meeting in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, June 28. </p>
<p>Some Democratic officials, like <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/clinton-supporter-points-obamas-latino-problem">Representative Nydia Velazquez, have said</a> Obama has a problem connecting with Latino voters, and argued <a href="/2008/velazquez-warns-obama-mccains-support-among-latinos">McCain's immigration policy is viewed so positively</a> among Latinos that some may decide to vote Republican.</p>
<p>In a public statement, Carrion, who is president of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials, said, &quot;Latino voters are going to play a decisive role in the general election and the community is ready to hear both candidates make their case.&quot;</p>
<p>Also attending the four-day event are Bill Richardson, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/carrion-hosts-mccain-and-obama-latino-conference#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24678">Adolfo Carrion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26445">Bill Richardson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:07:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Azi Paybarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71004 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hillary Supporter Demonstration Against &#039;Disloyal&#039; Kennedy and Dean</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/hillary-supporter-demonstration-against-disloyal-kennedy-and-d-n-c</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>   A <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/5/27/851/27760/318/523455">Kos commenter</a> notices that Ted Kennedy, among other leading Democrats, is denounced in strong terms in this post from a Clinton supporter on Hillary Clinton’s campaign web site.
<p> <a href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com/actioncenter/event/view/?id=14350">The notice</a>, posted earlier in the month for a demonstration at D.N.C. headquarters when the Rules and Bylaws Committee meets over the fate of the Florida and Michigan delegates, includes this line:  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/hillary-supporter-demonstration-against-disloyal-kennedy-and-d-n-c">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/hillary-supporter-demonstration-against-disloyal-kennedy-and-d-n-c#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49812">2008 Democrats</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24396">Howard Dean</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51920">Ted Kennedy</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:42:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katharine Jose</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69723 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clinton: Bush Should Skip Olympic Opening Ceremony</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/clinton-bush-should-skip-olympic-opening-ceremony</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>As<a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/Clinton_calls_for_Olympic_opening_boycott.html"> reported</a>, Hillary Clinton is calling for George W. Bush to boycott the opening ceremonies of the Olympic Games in Beijing this summer.
<p>Nancy<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3659651.ece"> Pelosi, who has taken an active role in the fight over remaining uncommitted superdelegates, made the same public demand earlier</a> this month.</p>
<p>The statement just released by the Clinton campaign: <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/clinton-bush-should-skip-olympic-opening-ceremony">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/clinton-bush-should-skip-olympic-opening-ceremony#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-w-bush">George W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:44:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katharine Jose</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67471 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hillary Bundlers to Pelosi: Back Off</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/hillary-bundlers-pelosi-back</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>A reader sends over a letter, dated today, from some of Hillary Clinton’s top fund-raisers to Nancy Pelosi. They’re responding to Pelosi’s recent comments in an ABC News interview <a href="/2008/nancy-pelosis-not-so-secret-support-obama">advocating the Obama campaign’s line on superdelegates</a>, which is that superdelegates ought to follow the lead of the pledged delegates. (If they do, Obama wins.)
<p>The fund-raisers note, in a passively menacing way, that they are “strong supporters” of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, before urging Pelosi to “clarify [her] position on superdelegates and reflect … a more open view to the optional independent actions of each of the delegates at the National Convention in August.”</p>
<p>The letter is signed by Marc Aronchick, Clarence Avant, Susie Tompkins Buell, Sim Farar, Robert Johnson, Chris Korge, Marc and Cathy Lasry, Hassan Nemazee, Alan and Susan Patricoff, JB Pritzker, Amy Rao, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, Haim Saban, Bernard Schwartz, Stanley Shuman, Jay and Tracy Snyder and Maureen White and Steve Rattner.</p>
<p>UPDATE: The Obama campaign responds after the jump.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/hillary-bundlers-pelosi-back">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/hillary-bundlers-pelosi-back#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:51:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67013 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nancy Pelosi&#039;s Not-So-Secret Support for Obama</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/nancy-pelosis-not-so-secret-support-obama</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Whatever her official posture, Nancy Pelosi is not neutral in the Democratic primary.
<p>Typically, for instance, someone who is neutral wouldn’t say that victory by one of the candidates would be “harmful.” That’s essentially how Pelosi, the supposedly impartial House Speaker, has characterized the prospective nomination of Hillary Clinton.</p>
<p>“If the votes of the superdelegates overturn what happens in the elections, it would be harmful to the Democratic Party,” Pelosi said in an interview for ABC’s “This Week” that was taped late last week. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/nancy-pelosis-not-so-secret-support-obama">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/nancy-pelosis-not-so-secret-support-obama#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.observer.com/files/columnone_031708.jpg" length="26695" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 22:54:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66510 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Swamp Things: Pelosi’s Bench Rolls Over on Iraq</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/swamp-things-pelosi-bench-rolls-over</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Gullible voters keen to treat the onset of the 2008 primary season as a hale sign of life in the American democratic system had best avert their gaze from Capitol Hill this week. For as Congress winds down the year’s business with earmark-laden appropriations bills and unsightly cave-ins to Bush prerogative after Bush prerogative, the governing metaphor is not the campaign scene’s notorious horse race—something that, for all its by-the-numbers familiarity, at least connotes forward motion. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/swamp-things-pelosi-bench-rolls-over">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/swamp-things-pelosi-bench-rolls-over#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:32:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Lehmann</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62189 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Stephen Colbert Goes Glam, Writers&#039; Strike Be Damned</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/stephen-colbert-goes-glam-writers-strike-be-damned</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Last evening, as the writers' strike got into full swing and late-night talk shows halted production, one comedian found a venue for his work. Stephen Colbert was tapped to introduce House Speaker Nancy Pelosi at <em>Glamour</em>'s Women of the Year awards, where she received special recognition from the Conde Nast title. So for one night, the only people watching Mr. Colbert were in the packed Avery Fisher Hall at Lincoln Center. To read the text of Mr. Colbert's introduction--in which he displays a suspiciously comprehensive knowledge of current women's fashion--click through to the jump. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/stephen-colbert-goes-glam-writers-strike-be-damned">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/stephen-colbert-goes-glam-writers-strike-be-damned#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/38033">Glamour Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24952">Stephen Colbert</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 10:21:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Doree Shafrir</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">59880 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why the Next Democratic Era May Be Different</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/why-next-democratic-era-may-be-different</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The last two times Democrats enjoyed untrammeled dominance in Washington, the consequences for the party were catastrophic. But there's hope if the fates align in 2008. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/why-next-democratic-era-may-be-different">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/why-next-democratic-era-may-be-different#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/bill-clinton">Bill Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25373">Jimmy Carter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24277">Richard Gephardt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51391">Tom Foley</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:46:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">59546 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thwarted Over Iraq, Pelosi Makes a Stand on Iran</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/thwarted-over-iraq-pelosi-makes-stand-iran</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It can often to seem to rank-and-file Democrats as if the Republicans are still in charge of Congress: Nearly a year after their party picked up 31 House and six Senate seats, the war in Iraq still rages, with tens of thousands of more troops deployed now than then. This failure to force even a beginning to the end of the war accounts for the painfully poor poll standing of the Democratic-led Congress, with the party faithful even more restless and frustrated than independent voters. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/thwarted-over-iraq-pelosi-makes-stand-iran">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/thwarted-over-iraq-pelosi-makes-stand-iran#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50811">ABC News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25259">George Stephanopoulos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-w-bush">George W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26227">Iran</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25558">Joseph Lieberman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51101">This Week</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:53:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">58821 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
