<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; The Gallup Organization</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25707/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>State Polls Indicate Obama&#039;s Tidal-Wave Potential, But National Polls Are Tight; Both Are Right</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/state-polls-indicate-obamas-tidal-wave-potential-national-polls-are-tight-both-are-rig</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Two radically different story lines are emerging in the presidential race, depending on what kind of poll you look at.</p>
<p>If you look at the national-level data, Barack Obama seems to be underachieving. In the latest Gallup daily tracking poll, the presumptive Democratic nominee holds a scant two-point edge over John McCain. The margin is also two points in Rasmussen's daily poll—which also shows a dead-even race when &quot;leaners&quot; are factored in. Some other recent polls have been a little more favorable to Obama, but the combined weight of the available national data strongly suggests that Obama, despite his personal popularity and the enormous built-in advantages his party enjoys this year, is locked in a much closer race than he should be. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/state-polls-indicate-obamas-tidal-wave-potential-national-polls-are-tight-both-are-rig">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/state-polls-indicate-obamas-tidal-wave-potential-national-polls-are-tight-both-are-rig#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25707">The Gallup Organization</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:14:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72052 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Security Rudy Trumps Gay Rights Rudy</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/29655</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->More evidence that Rudy Giuliani's liberal social positions are either a) unimportant to the national Republican base or b) unknown to them.

<p>A new Gallup poll finds that "only three candidates would be acceptable to a majority of Republicans." The are, in order: Giuliani with 73%, Condoleezza Rice with 68% and John McCain with 55%.</p>

Read the whole summary <a href="http://poll.gallup.com/content/?ci=23764">here</a>.

<em>-- Josh Benson</em>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/29655#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24737">Condoleezza Rice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rudolph-giuliani">Rudolph Giuliani</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25707">The Gallup Organization</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:26:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29655 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bush’s Low Ratings  Reflect Pre-9/11 Views</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/38719</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->George W. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/38719">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/38719#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24943">Osama bin Laden</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25707">The Gallup Organization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25465">Zogby International Inc.</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stephen Schlesinger</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">38719 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Bad Poll for Hillary</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/28474</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div>These things come in waves, somehow, and this is not Hillary's moment.

<a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/flash8.htm">Drudge has numbers</a> from the new CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll:

<p>"CNNGALLUP found that 51 percent say they definitely won't vote for Clinton (D-N.Y.) in 2008, another 32 percent might consider it, and only 16 percent vow to back her. That means committed anti-Hillary voters outnumber pro-Hillary voters by 3-1. The poll suggests she can forget about crossover votes - 90 percent of Republicans and 75 percent of conservatives say there's no way they'd back her."</p>

<em>NOTE: Yes, this was in <a href="http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/62235.htm">The Post this morning</a>. Wednesday mornings are a little rough around here. Sorry.</em><div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/28474#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25229">Cable News Network LP LLLP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25707">The Gallup Organization</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25706">USA TODAY</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:19:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28474 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
