<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Bob Dole</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25952/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Obama Bounce Starting to Show Up</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/obama-bounce-starting-show</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Maybe the media outlets that have been pushing the <a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/news/national/politics/2008/view.bg?articleid=1115555">Obama’s-not-getting-a-bounce theme</a> jumped the gun. The latest Gallup daily tracking poll – the result of interviews conducted between Monday and Wednesday nights this week – finds <a href="http://gallup.com/home.aspx">Obama pulling ahead by six points</a>, 48 percent to John McCain's 42 percent. That’s a clear jump for Obama from earlier this week, when Gallup showed John McCain actually <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/109834/Gallup-Daily-Bounce-Obama-Post-Biden-Tracking.aspx">edging into the lead</a> by a point.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>This is hardly surprising. Convention bounces don’t usually appear until a few days into the convention, or even just after the nominee’s acceptance speech – the idea that polls released earlier this week said anything about whether this convention had been helpful to Obama was rather silly to begin with. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/obama-bounce-starting-show">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/obama-bounce-starting-show#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56655">Convention</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25952">Bob Dole</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32388">Walter Mondale</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:48:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74114 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If Obama Picks Him, Biden Could Set a Longevity Record</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/if-obama-picks-him-biden-could-set-longevity-record</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p class="MsoNormal c5"><span><span class="c1">The prospect of Joe Biden joining Barack Obama’s ticket, which</span> <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/08/two-rumored-vee.html"><span class="c2">seems to have grown more real</span></a> <span class="c4"><span class="c3">in recent days, raises an interesting possibility: another Biden presidential campaign.</span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal c5"><span><span class="c1">Given</span> <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/01/04/biden_and_dodd_leave_the_race.html"><span class="c2">how his campaign turned out this year</span></a><span class="c1">, the idea of Biden ever seeking the White House again seems (and probably is) unlikely. But, at least in theory, a tour de force performance as the VP nominee – think</span> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-7gpgXNWYI"><span class="c2">Lloyd Bentsen in 1988</span></a><span class="c4"><span class="c3"> – could spark popular interest in a future Biden presidential campaign that was missing in this past one. If Obama were to lose, Biden (again, theoretically) might then have a shot at the 2012 nomination (much the way the ’92 nomination was essentially Bentsen’s for the taking after his ’88 performance).</span></span></span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/if-obama-picks-him-biden-could-set-longevity-record">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/if-obama-picks-him-biden-could-set-longevity-record#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/al-gore">Al Gore</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25952">Bob Dole</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26046">Eugene McCarthy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/37263">George McGovern</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56540">Harold Stassen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25627">Henry Clay</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50593">Jerry Brown</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51345">Joe Biden</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24277">Richard Gephardt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24746">Ronald Reagan</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:17:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">73372 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Memo to Olbermann et al: Keynoters and V.P.&#039;s From Same State Not That Uncommon</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/memo-olbermann-et-al-keynoters-and-v-p-s-same-state-not-uncommon</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p class="MsoNormal c2"><span class="c1">Tim Kaine’s stock as a potential running-mate for Barack Obama has dropped markedly in the last day, with the news that Mark Warner, Kaine’s predecessor as Virginia’s governor, will be the keynote speaker at the convention in Denver.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal c2"><span class="c1">The thinking, widely repeated in the media</span> <a href="http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2008/08/hotline_after_d_432.html#more"><span class="c3">yesterday</span></a> <span class="c1">and</span> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/13/AR2008081304137.html"><span class="c3">this morning</span></a><span class="c1">, is that Warner’s selection effectively excludes Kaine from the V.P. hunt since the Obama campaign wouldn’t want two Virginians occupying the featured speaking roles on two consecutive convention nights. As Keith Olbermann put it on his MSNBC show last night:</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal c2"><span class="c4">Warner's rising star might actually dim the VP chances for Virginia's current governor, <span>Tim Kaine</span> on this simple theory.</span></p>
 <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/memo-olbermann-et-al-keynoters-and-v-p-s-same-state-not-uncommon">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/memo-olbermann-et-al-keynoters-and-v-p-s-same-state-not-uncommon#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/al-gore">Al Gore</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26754">Ann Richards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25952">Bob Dole</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26235">Geraldine Ferraro</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26963">Harold Ford Jr.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40697">Jack Kemp</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32577">Keith Olbermann</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50266">Lloyd Bentsen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56518">Susan Molinari</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27007">Tim Kaine</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:04:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">73332 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>At Conventions, It&#039;s Television, Not the Platform, That Counts</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/conventions-its-television-not-platform-counts</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p class="MsoNormal">Every four years, involving one party or the other, it seems that we get a batch of stories just like <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/06/AR2008070602322.html?hpid=topnews">today’s <em>Washington Post</em> write-up</a> on a possible platform fight between John McCain and the G.O.P.’s right wing.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">It’s almost always much ado about nothing. Tension between the nominee of either party – who is interested in projecting a moderate, inclusive image to the general-election audience – and that nominee’s red-meat-hungry party base are inevitable. But party platforms themselves do not influence mass opinion – the pictures and sounds that come out of the convention do. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/conventions-its-television-not-platform-counts">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/conventions-its-television-not-platform-counts#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26479">Arnold Schwarzenegger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25952">Bob Dole</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26102">Colin Powell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52317">Joe Lieberman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rudolph-giuliani">Rudolph Giuliani</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:09:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71580 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Democratic Attacks on McCain&#039;s Age Miss the Point</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/democratic-attacks-mccains-age-miss-point</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Obviously, Democrats want voters to be thinking about John McCain’s age and fretting over whether it might be eating away at his mental faculties. There’s no other reason why party’s anti-McCain talking points would call for surrogates to so prominently slip forms of the word “confused” into attacks on the soon-to-be 72-year-old Republican candidate.
<p>In a Wednesday conference call that received much attention, Susan Rice, one of Obama’s national security advisors, talked about McCain’s “disturbing, even disconcerting, pattern of confusing the basic facts and reality that pertain to Iraq,” while John Kerry called his Senate colleague “confused” – a word he repeated several times in an MSNBC interview later in the day. It’s not the first time Democrats have played this card this year, and it surely won’t be the last. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/democratic-attacks-mccains-age-miss-point">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/democratic-attacks-mccains-age-miss-point#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/bill-clinton">Bill Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25952">Bob Dole</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27681">George H.W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-kerry">John Kerry</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24746">Ronald Reagan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53646">Susan Rice</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:32:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70657 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bluntest Age Attack Ever?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/most-blunt-age-attack-ever</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Think Barack Obama can get away with <a href="http://www.robandrewsforchange.com/thecommercial">an ad</a> like this in the fall? </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/most-blunt-age-attack-ever#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25952">Bob Dole</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/35979">Frank Lautenberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33805">Rob Andrews</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24746">Ronald Reagan</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:20:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69526 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>McCain Is Old Like Reagan, Not Like Dole</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/mccain-old-reagan-not-dole</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>This year, Republicans have chosen to nominate for president a war hero and longtime senator with one losing White House bid under his belt. In 1996, the party put up a 73-year-old war hero and longtime senator who already had two failed White House campaigns to this name.
<p>On this basis, it has become fashionable to compare John McCain to Bob Dole, the septuagenarian whose listless ’96 effort established the low-water mark for Republicans in the post-Goldwater era—159 electoral votes and 41 percent of the national popular vote.</p>
<p>Reflecting on Mr. McCain’s recent biography-themed campaign swing and a new ad, The Atlantic’s Ross Douthat wrote that the G.O.P. standard-bearer “pushes all my Dole-redux buttons.”  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/mccain-old-reagan-not-dole">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/mccain-old-reagan-not-dole#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25952">Bob Dole</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24746">Ronald Reagan</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:39:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67822 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When Romney Attacks, McCain Comes to Bob Dole&#039;s Defense</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/when-romney-attacks-mccain-comes-bob-doles-defense</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Yesterday <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/04/in-letter-to-limbaugh-bob-dole-defends-mccain/">Bob Dole came to the defense of John McCain in a letter to Rush Limbaugh </a>that hailed McCain as a &quot;mainstream conservative.&quot;</p>
<p>In a television appearance this morning on <em>Fox &amp; Friends,</em> <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2008/02/romney-says-bob.html">Mitt Romney told the host, Dole is &quot;the last person I would want to write a letter for me</a>.&quot;</p>
<p>Now, McCain is returning the favor. His campaign just issued the following statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Governor Romney's attack on Bob Dole is disgraceful, and Governor Romney should apologize. Bob Dole is a war hero who has spent his life in service to this nation and nobody has worked harder to build the Republican Party. Bob Dole deserves the respect of every American and certainly every Republican.</p></blockquote>
<p>Full statement after the jump. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/when-romney-attacks-mccain-comes-bob-doles-defense">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/when-romney-attacks-mccain-comes-bob-doles-defense#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25952">Bob Dole</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26468">Mitt Romney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/supertuesday">Super Tuesday</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:16:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katharine Jose</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">64545 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Costly Illusion Of Mitt Romney</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/costly-illusion-mitt-romney</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Their gaudy fund-raising numbers for the first three months of 2007 elevated Barack Obama and Mitt R <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/costly-illusion-mitt-romney">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/costly-illusion-mitt-romney#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25952">Bob Dole</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26468">Mitt Romney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27677">Phil Gramm</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">37109 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Air Spitzer</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/28821</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->The <a href="http://www.spitzer2006.com">Spitzer campaign</a> announced this morning that they're hiring a Madison Avenue veteran, Jimmy Siegel, to produce their television advertising -- and that they're going up on the air next week.

<p>The ad guy, Jimmy Siegel, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=books&field-author-exact=James%20Siegel&rank=-relevance%2C%2Bavailability%2C-daterank/102-6430807-0630514">also writes thrillers</a>, but doesn't seem to have any political experience. He's best known for selling a product that every consumer advocating lawman can stand behind: credit cards. He made Visa ads for BBDO, including that Bob Dole spot, but left the agency after it <a href="http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:8bCGA9O2PTsJ:www.mediainfo.com/aw/search/article_display.jsp%3Fschema%3D%26vnu_content_id%3D1001806964%26WebLogicSession%3DQgqcdkLaw6ujwz63KnrIFz3Lee2Y0xpftmYVebNGwCpjUo2R6Fnw%257C3710535491917000225/181605430/6/7005/7005/7002/7002/7005/-1+%22jimmy+siegel%22+bbdo+visa&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2">lost the Visa contract last fall</a>.</p>

By going outside the usual field of political admakers, Spitzer will probably retain more control of the content -- he's known as a demanding client who, at one point, wrote his own ads -- and again demonstrates his skepticism of the way politics is normally done, something he demonstrated in his quick, early, unvetted selection of David Paterson as his running mate, and in his decision last year to place a round of robo-calls to voters.]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/28821#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24731">Amazon.com Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25952">Bob Dole</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24878">David Paterson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25951">Jimmy Siegel</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:02:19 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28821 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
