<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; John Zogby</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26056/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I Want My MTV—But Not My ESPN</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/zogby-la-carte</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Cable a la carte, anyone? <span>According to a <a href="http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1377">new Zogby poll</a>, 52 percent of cable subscribers say they would prefer to purchase cable channels individually rather than the in bulk packages. </span><span>It's possible they might someday get their wish. </span>
<p><span>Current FCC Chairman Kevin Martin supports &quot;a la carte&quot; cable, arguing that it would bring down costs for individual subscribers. But heavyweight programming providers like Disney typically oppose the idea because the current system gives them more leverage to pile multiple channels into every subscriber’s package. </span><span>In the same poll, 82 percent of subscribers said they thought current cable bills were too high, and </span><span>71 percent said they disagree with having to shell out money for channels they never watch.</span><span>  </span></p>
<p><span>Other FCC commissioners, most notably Democrat Jonathan Adelstein, have argued that an a la carte system would actually end up increasing individual cable bills, because networks would be forced to spend so much additional money on advertising. </span></p>
<p><span><br /></span><span> </span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/zogby-la-carte">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/zogby-la-carte#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26056">John Zogby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51313">Jonathan Adelstein</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51312">Kevin Martin</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:57:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">59349 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In ’06 Election, Clinton Needs  To Beat Chuck’s ’04</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/38633</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->It was July 11, 2004, and Senator Charles Schumer was at a road race in Utica, N.Y., shaking hand af <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/38633">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/38633#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24334">Charles Schumer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26056">John Zogby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/34607">Mickey Blum</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ben Smith</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">38633 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In Today&#039;s Observer</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/28981</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><a href="http://www.observer.com/images/featureimages032906/COVER.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 250px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://www.observer.com/images/featureimages032906/COVER.jpg" border="1" /></a>

<p>Our legal reporter, <a href="http://www.observer.com/20060403/20060403_Anna_Schneider-Mayerson_pageone_coverstory1.asp">Anna Schneider-Mayerson, has a must-read</a> about the odd relationship between the job of Attorney General and the lawyering experience of the people who want it.</p>

<blockquote>So who are these people? Can the office of the Attorney General, presently held by a man whom some have called the most important politician in the country outside of Washington, really be a consolation prize for politicians with previously higher ambitions? If it's the "capstone" of a legal career in New York, why don't more New York lawyers -- real lawyers -- want the job?</blockquote>

<p>Also a rundown of when the candidates actually last appeared in court, and Andrew has what sound to the untrained ear like less-than-adulatory words for Eliot.</p>

Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.observer.com/20060403/20060403_Ben_Smith_politics_newsstory1.asp">I play the expectations game</a> with Hillary's 2006 numbers, and ask John Zogby, in passing, what happened to those 2000 polls of his that gave the race to Lazio.
<a href="http://www.observer.com/20060403/20060403_E.J._Kessler_opinions_wiseguys.asp">
Eve Kessler has an optimistic take</a> on Hillary's appeal to Catholic voters.

<p>Also: <a href="http://www.observer.com/20060403/20060403_Joe_Conason_politics_joeconason.asp">Conason on Scalia</a> and <a href="http://www.observer.com/20060403/20060403_Richard_Brookhiser_opinions_brookhiser.asp">Brookhiser on the Mormons</a>.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/28981#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24376">Eve Kessler</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26056">John Zogby</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 03:39:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28981 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bloomberg&#039;s Budget, $8.1 Million So Far, Doesn&#039;t Move Polls</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/44720</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->If you ask Hilda Peltz about Michael Bloomberg's television commercials, the septuagenarian has near <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/44720">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/44720#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25096">Forest Hills</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26056">John Zogby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/42362">William Cunningham</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2001 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrea Bernstein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44720 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mayor&#039;s Problems Aren&#039;t Exactly New</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/42752</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Rudolph Giuliani will bluster until he runs out of breath, but the city's abrupt settlement of his f <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/42752">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/42752#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26056">John Zogby</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25465">Zogby International Inc.</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2000 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Conason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42752 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
