<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Conor Clarke</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27279/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Democrats and Wal-Mart</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/31079</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->An interesting piece of trivia about the field of Democrats jockeying for the nomination in 2008: 

<p>The three leading contenders all have ties to Wal-Mart, a decidedly controversial company among Democratic primary voters.</p>

Writing in <a href="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w070101&s=clarke010407">The New Republic</a> [subscription], Conor Clarke makes the connections, starting with Hillary Clinton.

<blockquote><p>Between 1986 and 1992, she served on the Arkansas-based company's board of directors, a position that let her rake in about $12,500 per year. During the 1992 campaign, she still owned about $80,000 in company stock. 

<p>Skip</p>

Last January, the senator scolded Wal-Mart for not doing enough about healthcare--but withered when asked if she ever suggested a change when she served on the board. "Well, you know, I, that was a long time ago, I have to remember." Not a good answer.
</p></blockquote>

<p>Clarke notes that John Edwards "used to own company stock--stock he conveniently managed to sell in 2004."</p>

The piece also draws a connection between Barack Obama and Wal-Mart, though that particular dossier is, by the author's admission, pretty thin.

<blockquote><p>In an impressive demonstration of historical repetition, the senator's wife, Michelle, earns about $45,000 per year (plus stock options) serving on the board of a major Chicago food company whose biggest customer is--one guess--Wal-Mart. If that connection seems pretty distant (and, really, the connection is pretty distant) just think about all the tenuously relevant personal details that can railroad a perfectly respectable presidential campaign. Campaign critics can make a four-course meal out of pretty thin gruel.</p></blockquote>

<em>-- Azi Paybarah</em>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/31079#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24506">Arkansas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27279">Conor Clarke</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24307">New Republic Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24918">Wal-Mart Stores Inc.</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 04:45:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31079 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
