<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Michigan</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27436/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Obama Goes to Flint</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/obama-goes-flint</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It was probably not a speech Barack Obama would have given during the primary.
<p>His address at Kettering University in Flint, Michigan today, entitled "Renewing American Competitiveness," is, on one level, another version of the core message of his campaign: that a vote for him is one for the future while a vote for John McCain is one for the past and George Bush's third term. But the speech was perhaps most notable for its defense of globalization in an old-line bastion of American manufacturing. The points in the speech in which Obama discusses the need to re-tool in order to cope with an internationalized economy seem to be aimed more at unions, and perhaps at the Rust Belt Democrats who supported Hillary Clinton in the primary, than McCain and the Bush administration. </p>
<p>From the prepared version: "So there is a clear choice in this election. Instead of reaching for new horizons, George Bush has put us in a hole, and John McCain’s policies will keep us there. I want to take us in a new and better direction. I reject the belief that we should either shrink from the challenge of globalization, or fall back on the same tired and failed approaches of the last eight years. It’s time for new policies that create the jobs and opportunities of the future– a competitiveness agenda built upon education and energy, innovation and infrastructure, fair trade and reform."  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/obama-goes-flint">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/obama-goes-flint#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27436">Michigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53549">NAFTA</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:08:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70751 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clinton&#039;s Letter to Obama About Florida and Michigan</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/clinton-writes-obama-demand-michigan-and-florida-votes-be-honored</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Hillary Clinton just sent a formal public letter to Barack Obama calling on him to work to find a resolution to the Florida and Michigan question that reflects the votes in those states and seats their delegations at the convention. She also attempts to shame him for what she calls his failure to &quot;support those efforts&quot; in Michigan, and for the Obama campaign's opposition to revotes in Florida. &quot;In Florida a number of revote options were proposed. I am not aware of any that you supported,&quot; she writes. </p>
<p><a href="/2008/no-discussions-about-dropping-out">As pointed out in a conference call yesterday</a>, it is not clear that the Clinton campaign picks up enough support to change their dire position even if both states are counted. But as long as the Obama campaign doesn't budge, it's a talking point for the Clinton campaign.</p>
<p>Here's the letter: <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/clinton-writes-obama-demand-michigan-and-florida-votes-be-honored">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/clinton-writes-obama-demand-michigan-and-florida-votes-be-honored#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24349">Florida</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27436">Michigan</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:20:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68970 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Obama Moves Toward an Inevitable Embrace of Florida and Michigan</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/obama-moves-toward-inevitable-embrance-florida-and-michigan</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Slowly but steadily, Barack Obama's campaign is coming around to the reality of the Florida and Michigan situation.
<p>Until now, his approach has essentially been to bury his head in the sand in the hope that the whole matter would just go away&mdash;which is would have, had Obama finished off Hillary Clinton is Tuesday's voting. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/obama-moves-toward-inevitable-embrance-florida-and-michigan">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/obama-moves-toward-inevitable-embrance-florida-and-michigan#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24349">Florida</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27436">Michigan</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:26:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66118 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Obama Should Champion the Cause of Michigan and Florida</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/obama-should-champion-cause-michigan-and-florida</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>If Hillary Clinton does well enough in tomorrow’s quartet of primaries to continue, her campaign’s next step will to resume banging the drum about seating the delegates of  Michigan and Florida at the convention.
<p>Barack Obama should support this aim.</p>
<p>Realistically, any Clinton nomination scenario at this point requires the inclusion of lopsidedly pro-Hillary delegations from Michigan and Florida at the national convention, since she's all but certain -- even with wins tomorrow -- to finish the primary season with fewer pledged delegates than Obama. Both states held "outlaw" primaries in January: None of the candidates really campaigned in either state, turnout was markedly lower than in other states, and Obama's name wasn't even on the Michigan ballot. Clinton won them both handily.</p>
<p>The Clinton campaign has been playing the voter-disenfranchisement card, arguing that the delegations must be seated to honor the will of voters in both states. This argument has not gained much traction, given the obvious flaws of both contests. But Clinton's hope seems to be that attitudes might shift if she reels off a late series of primary victories, starting with Texas and Ohio tomorrow. Perhaps then, the thinking goes, Democrats might be more receptive to finding a way to dump Obama, even if he has a slight lead in pledged delegates and cumulative votes. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/obama-should-champion-cause-michigan-and-florida">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/obama-should-champion-cause-michigan-and-florida#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24349">Florida</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24396">Howard Dean</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27436">Michigan</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:25:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65857 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Michigan Stakes: McCain Means Order, Romney (or Huckabee) Means Chaos</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/michigan-stakes-mccain-means-order-romney-or-huckabee-means-chaos</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It’s true that this year’s Republican presidential race is the most fluid on record. At varying points, John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee have all seemed to be plausible front-runners.</p>
<p>
But by Tuesday night, after the results from what is only the third major contest of the nominating season are tallied, the race may be close to over&mdash;or it will be more jumbled than ever. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/michigan-stakes-mccain-means-order-romney-or-huckabee-means-chaos">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/michigan-stakes-mccain-means-order-romney-or-huckabee-means-chaos#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32754">Fred Thompson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27436">Michigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26228">Mike Huckabee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26468">Mitt Romney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rudolph-giuliani">Rudolph Giuliani</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.observer.com/files/columnone_011508.jpg" length="26990" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:00:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">63416 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Andy Richter Returns—And This Time,  It’s For Good</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/36926</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->&quot;I like cuteness in my babies and puppies, but not in my comedy,&rdquo; said the actor and come <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/36926">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/36926#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32566">Andy Barker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32567">Andy Richter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32568">Lew Staziak</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27436">Michigan</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sara Vilkomerson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">36926 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Knobs for the Snobs</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/36796</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->The private-equity trader had to have the pumpkin-shaped doorknob in every room. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/36796">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/36796#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32395">Erich Theophile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32397">Hernando Perez</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27436">Michigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32396">Nepal</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Toni Schlesinger</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">36796 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rudy Opposes Abortion, Supports Second Amendment. Who Knew?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/31412</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->The Rudy Giuliani campaign just finished up a conference call to announce the support of Representative Candice S. Miller of Michigan, who said that Rudy would be most "ready" of all the candidates to deal with a "worst case scenario."

<p>In yet another preview of Giuliani line on his for 2008 on his liberal social positions, Miller -- who played an active role in George Bush's campaigns -- made a point of saying that as mayor of New York, Giuliani "really governed as a conservative."</p>

When asked to square her staunch pro-life stance with Giuliani's pro-choice position, Miller turned to what some Giuliani observers suggested as a practical "out" for him several months ago: the appointment of conservative judges.

<p>"I heard from him his desire to appoint judges like Roberts and Alito. The mayor is a very strict constructionist," said Miller, who added "at the same time, he is personally opposed to abortion."</p>

When asked about Giuliani's string advocacy of gun control back when he was mayor, Miller said, "He told me he is a very strong supporter of the second amendment."

<p>Problem?</p>

<em>--Jason Horowitz</em>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/31412#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27435">Candice Miller</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-w-bush">George W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27436">Michigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rudolph-giuliani">Rudolph Giuliani</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 07:32:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31412 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>And Now It’s a Trilogy:  The Bascombe Saga Continued</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/36200</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Back in 1986, it seemed that a lot of us&mdash;and by us, I mean late-twentysomething and early-thir <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/36200">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/36200#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31559">Frank Bascombe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27436">Michigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24703">New Jersey</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31560">Richard Ford</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 19:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andre Bernard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">36200 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In Simone’s Shoes: Laura Kipnis  Lets Loose on Big Ones</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/36141</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->&ldquo;Not to compare myself to Simone de Beauvoir&mdash;who is, you know, this vast intellectual he <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/36141">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/36141#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31464">Birkenstock Sandals</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28128">Botox</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27436">Michigan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28689">Rebecca Mead</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sheelah Kolhatkar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">36141 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
