<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Deborah Solomon</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28367/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Ron Burkle on David Geffen: &quot;Aggressive!&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/32581</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->In the coming <em>New York Times Magazine</em>, interrogator Deborah Solomon asks Ron Burkle a few questions.

About David Geffen's revolt against Hillary:
<blockquote>"... I have known David for a long time. David is very aggressive in his comments and very aggressive in his thoughts on everything."</blockquote>

About whether Al Gore should run (and, remember, this is the guy who is holding a 1,000-person Hillary Clinton fund-raiser at his Beverly Hills house):
<blockquote>"I told him the other day, he has made me so much money, I hope he keeps working."
</blockquote>
What about his war with The New York Post? Was the Post pursuing a political agenda?
<blockquote>"I think it could have just as easily been an agenda by some people at the paper to make money."</blockquote>

<em>- Tom McGeveran</em>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/32581#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">Style</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/al-gore">Al Gore</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/david-geffen">David Geffen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28367">Deborah Solomon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28155">Ron Burkle</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:14:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32581 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tim Russert Meows at the Times</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/33219</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->The shoe being on the other foot, Tim Russert of NBC took the opportunity of being interviewed by Brian Lamb on <a href="http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/fullschedule.csp?timeid=212015371737">Washington Journal </a> this morning to complain about an interview of him that the Times Magazine ran <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00C10FC3D5A0C778DDDAC0894DE404482">on Mother's Day</a>. Russert said that reporter Deborah Solomon merged answers to different questions so as to make it appear that they were answers to one question. He said that the Times embarrassed him by titling it an interview about his father, when it was about his mother. He said that he had written a long letter to the Times, after complaining to Solomon, and that the Times hadn't run it yet. "What else are you going to do?" Brian Lamb said. "I don't know what else I <em>can </em>do," Russert lamented (beside bitch about it on national television).

<p>In the mandala of press abuses, this one doesn't rate. Most authors&#151;the Times interview coincided with a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1400064805/qid=1148668924/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/104-5131010-7970308?s=books&v=glance&n=283155">new book</a> by Russert&#151;would happily accept Russert's treatment. A lot of what Solomon evidently did goes with the territory of magazine writing, making things easier for people to read. Russert never said that Solomon misquoted him or misrepresented his words or ideas. Oh, he doesn't like the headline. Russert needs to absorb the lesson of Big Russ, his father, and take it like a man.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/33219#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29152">Brian Lamb</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28367">Deborah Solomon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25173">NBC Universal Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29006">Tim Russert</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 10:38:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33219 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Contemporary Began When? Times Sets Date at 1970</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/42491</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Dear Reader: Have you ever wondered when, exactly, what we call "contemporary art" began? <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/42491">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/42491#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28367">Deborah Solomon</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/36280">James Joyce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33418">Philippe de Montebello</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31825">Sean Scully</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2000 19:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Hilton Kramer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">42491 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
