<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Robert Bennett</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28379/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Reporter Miller Is Spinning Fast From Times Orbit</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/37850</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->By Tuesday, Oct. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/37850">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/37850#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28371">Arthur Sulzberger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28558">Byron Calame</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/judith-miller">Judith Miller</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28379">Robert Bennett</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anna Schneider-Mayerson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">37850 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Miller Negotiating Terms of Potential Departure</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/32709</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div>Reporter Judith Miller and <em>The New York Times</em> are in negotiations over the terms under which she would possibly agree to leave the paper. 

<p>According to a source familiar with the discussions, there are three issues on the table. The first is how much severance Miller would receive, the second concerns whether she will be given space on the Op-Ed page to answer critics and the third is whether the <em>Times</em> and Miller will issue a joint statement defining the terms of her departure.</p>

Miller declined to comment. Miller's attorney, Robert Bennett, and <em>Times</em> lawyer George Freeman, did not return calls for comment.

<p>Multiple sources sympathetic to Miller's case said they did not anticipate Miller leaving until her conditions were met.</p>

"The sense I have is that it's not a question of dismissing her. If she won't go, she won't go," said one source.

<p>On Monday, the <em>Observer</em> reported that Miller had met with publisher Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr. Today, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported that the meeting had touched on severance.</p>

Miller's potential departure is complicated by the fact that she is protected by the Newspaper Guild's contract with the paper. The contract limits the paper's ability to fire employees at will.

<p>A source with knowledge of the proceedings said Miller has not ruled out legal action if her proposed conditions are not met.</p>

"She will not leave under these circumstances, not in a defamatory atmosphere," the source said.

--Anna Schneider-Mayerson and Gabriel Sherman<div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/32709#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28547">George Freeman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/judith-miller">Judith Miller</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28379">Robert Bennett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24260">Wall Street</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32709 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Judging Judy</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/32589</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div>Media Mob special Washington correspondent Chris Shott reports:

<p>As reporters jockeyed for the few remaining seats in U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan's packed Washington courtroom, Brian Bennett offered up his excuse to cut in line."I'm from <em>Time</em> magazine, the defendant," Bennett told security officers. "I'm covering the trial. Can I get in?"</p>

<em>Time</em> wasn't exactly the defendant anymore; soon enough, Bennett's colleague Matt Cooper wouldn't be one either. Nevertheless, Bennett got a seat.

<p>More than 70 other journalists and observers, meanwhile, were relegated to a spare courtroom, where proceedings in the case against Cooper and the New York Times' Judy Miller were broadcast over a grainy PA system.</p>

Through the speakers, the overflow press heard Cooper's tale of last-minute deliverance--the "personal consent" of his mystery source to dissolve their confidentiality agreement. "I am prepared to testify," Cooper said.

<p>Miller was not. "I cannot break my word to stay out of jail," she  told Judge Hogan. "I don't want to go jail," she added. "And I hope you won't send me."</p>

Picking up on Judge Hogan's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/30/politics/30leak.html?hp&ex=1120190400&amp;en=c47e1de1f7a37fa0&ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage">Lewis Carroll citation </a>the previous week, Miller's attorney Robert Bennett argued that the contempt case against his client was like something from Alice in Wonderland. "Judith Miller never committed a crime," he said, and "never wrote an article." Incarceration, Bennett said, would do nothing to break her defiance of the court's order. "She is not gonna reveal her source," he said.

<p>But Bennett suggested that his unbreakable client be spared jail and sentenced to home detainment. He had two contractors on hand, he said, to set it up, should it please the court. At the very least, he said, the court should send Miller somewhere other than the "overcrowded" D.C. jail--where, he added, "we seriously believe that Ms. Miller's safety would be in jeopardy." The defense team proposed the female-friendly Arlington Detention Center as an alternative.</p>

Hogan, though, ruled that Miller was "an actor in the commission of a crime." The judge also rejected the argument that Miller's pledge of silence should render any actual incarceration moot. That stance, Hogan said, was "like a child saying, 'You can spank me, but I'm still gonna take that piece of chocolate cake and eat it.'"

<p>"Talk about Alice in Wonderland," the judge said.</p>

Miller would be jailed, the judge said, "as long as she continues to defy the court order." At that, reporters jumped out of their seats, flipped open their cell phones and headed out the door.

<p>But Hogan went on, agreeing to spare Miller the rigors of the D.C. jail, in favor of an unspecified "suitable jail within the metropolitan area."</p>

Afterward, reporters from the overflow room scrounged eyewitness details from the ones who'd made it into the courtroom. Two women described for the press-on-press gaggle how a trio of U.S. marshals had escorted Miller out through a side door.

<p>Speaking to reporters outside the courthouse under a statue of Civil War general George Gordon Meade, the <em>Times</em>' executive editor, Bill Keller, called Miller's sentencing "a chilling conclusion to an utterly confounding case."</p>

Miller's attorneys had offered the possibility that the case might not reveal that any crime had taken place."I don't know that no crime has been committed," said First Amendment specialist Floyd Abrams, one of Miller's lawyers. But if so, it "would be a terrible irony," he added.

<p>During his own turn at the podium, Cooper called it "a sad day for journalism."</p>

Questions followed. "Who is your source?" one reporter asked.

Cooper remained silent.<div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/32589#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28378">Brian Bennett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/judith-miller">Judith Miller</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28379">Robert Bennett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24267">The New York Times Company</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:03:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32589 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Drudge&#039;s Mystery Source? It&#039;s Wachtell&#039;s Conway</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/40162</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->At last report, George T. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/40162">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/40162#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/36481">George Conway</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211">Kenneth Starr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29230">Paula Jones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28379">Robert Bennett</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 1998 19:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Conason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">40162 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What Did Kenneth Starr Know About the Lewinsky Tapes?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/40116</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->With many Americans wondering how President Clinton suddenly became the target of a sexual inquisiti <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/40116">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/40116#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/36399">Linda Tripp</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26822">Monica Lewinsky</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29230">Paula Jones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28379">Robert Bennett</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 1998 19:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Conason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">40116 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
