<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://origin.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Craig Whitney</title>
 <link>http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28707/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Times Editor Denies Paper Plagiarized Newsweek Story</title>
 <link>http://origin.observer.com/2008/did-times-borrow-newsweek-story</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Did a recent<em> Times</em> story borrow from a 14-month-old <em>Newsweek</em> story on the Buenos Aires party scene?</p>
<p>Fishbowl NY, which links to an Argentinan blog which makes the <a href="http://www.theargentinepost.com/">original case</a>, passes no judgment but presents <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/newspapers/did_the_new_york_times_travel_editor_steal_a_story_from_newsweek_80946.asp?c=rss">the blog's case.</a>  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://origin.observer.com/2008/did-times-borrow-newsweek-story">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://origin.observer.com/2008/did-times-borrow-newsweek-story#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28707">Craig Whitney</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54007">Denny Lee</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50220">New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51702">Newsweek</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:03:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67057 at http://origin.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Times Standards Editor Revists Sourcing in the Wake of Margaret Seltzer</title>
 <link>http://origin.observer.com/2008/times-standards-editor-revists-sourcing-wake-margaret-seltzer</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Yesterday, <em>The New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/05/books/05fake.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">asked what the</a> publishing industry&mdash;and the paper itself&mdash;could have done to have fact-checked a fradulent story produced by Margaret Seltzer that made its way into a book, and to the pages of the paper itself in a profile. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://origin.observer.com/2008/times-standards-editor-revists-sourcing-wake-margaret-seltzer">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://origin.observer.com/2008/times-standards-editor-revists-sourcing-wake-margaret-seltzer#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28707">Craig Whitney</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50220">New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:52:16 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66074 at http://origin.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New York Times On Sourcing the John McCain Piece: Warmer ... Warmer ... Cold!</title>
 <link>http://origin.observer.com/2008/new-york-times-sourcing-john-mccain</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>David Brooks <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/22/opinion/22brooks.html?hp">writes in the</a> <em>Times</em> today that McCain supporters are trying to figure out who the plausible candidates for the anonymous sources in yesterday's story could be.</p>
<p>Just as a refresher, we decided to call the paper's standards editor, Craig Whitney, to ask what the <em>Times</em> rules are on a related issue: Can a person give both an on-the-record quote and appear in the same story as an unnamed source? The answer is yes, but as long as the messages aren't contradictory. Whitney said: <span class='read-more'><a href="http://origin.observer.com/2008/new-york-times-sourcing-john-mccain">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://origin.observer.com/2008/new-york-times-sourcing-john-mccain#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28707">Craig Whitney</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50220">New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:22:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65510 at http://origin.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Times Staffers&#039; Guidelines for Travel Site: &quot;The worst steak in Gstaad&quot;  is Not Appropriate</title>
 <link>http://origin.observer.com/node/32985</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Today, <em>New York Times</em>' staffers received an email from Deputy Managing Editor Jonathan Landman and Standards Editor Craig Whitney, outlining ethical concerns about posting to the new Travel web site. 

<p>Righ now, readers--and <em>Times</em> reporters--can comment on <a href="http://travel.nytimes.com/travel/guides/europe/britain/england/london/overview.html?mkt=travelreviewlink1">London</a>, Paris and Los Angeles. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://origin.observer.com/node/32985">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>

After the jump is the full memo with guidelines, such as no anonymous posting in the comments section. Take that "sprezzatura!"
]]></description>
 <comments>http://origin.observer.com/node/32985#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28707">Craig Whitney</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24683">Los Angeles</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24384">Paris</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24267">The New York Times Company</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:38:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32985 at http://origin.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Public Editor Leaves Something Out</title>
 <link>http://origin.observer.com/node/33199</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Last Sunday the Times' public editor, Byron Calame, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/21/opinion/21pubed.html?_r=1&oref=slogin">described</a> how a canard had made it on to the front page: a report in April that the new Airbus jumbos would carry more than 800 passengers by having them stand up, harnessed to stalls. The story was wrong, but it went round the world faster than you can tie your shoes.

<p>The problem with the public editor's story is that it reprises <a href="http://www.observer.com/20060508/20060508_Gabriel_Sherman_media_offtherecord-2.asp#Airbus">virtually the same story</a> by the Observer's Gabe Sherman three weeks back. Sherman did his reporting on the heels of a lame-o correction of the airplane story in the Times on May 2. Sherman quoted a leading Times editor, Craig Whitney, saying that the correction was insufficient. And lo, the next day, The Times expanded its correction to an Editor's Note. Calame writes, "The May 2 correction did not go far enough in clearing up the issue, and top editors heard complaints from inside the newsroom. So on May 4 an Editors' Note essentially corrected the correction." The Public Editor opens his inquest with a sweet bromide of journalism: If your mother says she loves you, check it out. (I never got that one anyway&#151;tell me how you check it out.) Right now I'm thinking of another bromide: Credit where credit is due.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://origin.observer.com/node/33199#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29133">Airbus SAS</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28558">Byron Calame</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28707">Craig Whitney</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25972">Gabe Sherman</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 09:13:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33199 at http://origin.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&#039;Times&#039; To Grill Freelancers</title>
 <link>http://origin.observer.com/node/32852</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Beginning today, <i>The New York Times</i> will require freelance writers to fill out questionnaires that ask for detailed information about their work history and "any past instances when questions were raised about the accuracy or originality of their work." The information will be used to "determine what future assignments are appropriate."

<p>The full memo follows. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://origin.observer.com/node/32852">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://origin.observer.com/node/32852#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28705">Al Siegal</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28707">Craig Whitney</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28708">Nancy Sharkey</category>
 <category domain="http://origin.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28706">Siegal Committee</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:50:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32852 at http://origin.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
