<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Murray Friedman</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29228/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Walt and Mearsheimer as Scholars of Jewish History</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/33642</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->One thing that Walt and Mearsheimer do in <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2007/01/walt-and-mearsheimer-rebut-and-humble-their-critics.html">their rebuttal </a>is to list the large number of policymakers, including Jews like Feith, Perle, Wurmser and Wolfowitz (I would add Abrams), who are "deeply committed" to Israel and helped get us into the war in Iraq. "We emphasize again that we see nothing wrong with this [commitment], as all Americans are entitled to such attachments and are free to express them in political life," they add. 

<p>Identifying the neoconservatives as Jewish is one of those unspoken/spoken things in public life today. Two years ago, Wolfowitz was asked a question about the neoconservatives at the American Enterprise Institute and quipped, "Don't you mean Jewish?" He was being ironical; his point was that the identification was itself antisemitic.</p>

This is not very straightforward. Before W&M came along, two Jewish conservative scholars wrote books that described the neocons as Jewish. <a href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/cm/main/viewArticle.aip?id=10033">The Neoconservative Revolution</a>: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy, by the late Murray Friedman. And <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Fatal-Embrace-Jews-State/dp/0226296660">The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, </a>by Benjamin Ginsberg.

<p>Ginsberg's book came out in 1993 and is an important work for anyone trying to understand Jewish power, the Jewish presence in the American establishment. Indeed, though Ginsberg's politics are opposite to mine, I admire him for doing what an intellectual should do, and working to describe new social patterns. Ginsberg's historical theme is simple: Jews have risen again and again because our skills have proven essential to states trying to become modern. We made Spain what it was in the 15th century. We allowed the German and English states to rise in the late 19th century. "Jewish academics, intellectuals, and artists were the leading figures in German theater, literature, music, art, architecture, science and philosophy.... " Etc. The words "Jewish financier" appear countless times in Ginsberg's book, for an obvious reason: the Jewish genius for finance has lifted and empowered the modern state. (Yivo, which burlesqued the issue of <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2006/10/niall-ferguson-disappoints-on-jews-and-money.html">Jews & Money by inviting the vapid Niall Ferguson</a> to talk about it, should invite Ginsberg to make up for the lapse). <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/33642">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/33642#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29427">Benjamin Ginsberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24875">Berlin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29228">Murray Friedman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24307">New Republic Inc.</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:17:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33642 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I Apologize for Sloppy Statements About Jews</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/33327</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->An entry I did <a href="http://mondoweiss.observer.com/2006/06/my-jewish-problem-cted-david-brooks-uses-code-words-for-the-.html">the other day</a> on David Brooks's column in the Times went over the line in referring to "Jewish writers." I wish I hadn't done it&#151;and thereby given fuel to vile antisemites. I apologize.
 <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/33327">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/33327#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24268">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24689">Israel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29228">Murray Friedman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29229">University of Cambridge</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 05:24:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33327 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
