<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Bill Kristol</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29359/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>David Axelrod Has No Fear</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/david-axelrod-has-no-fear</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Before the <a href="http://www.observer.com/mobile/article/76382">vice-presidential debate in St. Louis</a> on October 2, I asked David Axelrod what he expected Republicans to produce as an October surprise this year, and whether his campaign was prepared to defend against them.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/david-axelrod-has-no-fear">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/david-axelrod-has-no-fear#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29359">Bill Kristol</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24752">David Axelrod</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57586">October Surprise</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56988">Sarah Palin</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:11:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76460 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Media Fascination With Obama Is No Liberal Conspiracy</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/media-fascination-obama-no-liberal-conspiracy</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Once again, the right is up in arms, yelling that the Liberal Media is conspiring to distort coverage and silence opposing views so that their chosen candidate might claim the White House. Several specific developments account for the current clamoring.
<p>One is the presidential-level press coverage of Barack Obama’s trip to Afghanistan and the Middle East, where he’s been accompanied by all three network news anchors and many of the most prominent television and print correspondents. John McCain, meanwhile, has taken many similar excursions but never received remotely comparable coverage. And this week in particular, McCain seems sort of like Macaulay Culkin in <em>Home Alone</em> – left by himself while everyone else heads overseas. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/media-fascination-obama-no-liberal-conspiracy">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/media-fascination-obama-no-liberal-conspiracy#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29359">Bill Kristol</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28152">David Brooks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29296">Paul Krugman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56080">Us Weekly</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72320 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bill Kristol Not Going Over Well at the Times</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/bill-kristol-not-going-over-well-times</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>Observer </em>alumnus Gabe Sherman has a <a href="http://tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=7b687811-caed-4ded-bda3-66d9c1b11f71">piece </a>in <em>The New Republic</em> today that pins Arthur Sulzberger Jr. to Bill Kristol's hiring and how lots of current and former <em>Times</em> staffers aren't happy about it.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/bill-kristol-not-going-over-well-times">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/bill-kristol-not-going-over-well-times#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52733">Andy Rosenthal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/arthur-sulzberger-jr">Arthur Sulzberger Jr.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29359">Bill Kristol</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49968">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:35:19 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">64003 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>So This Is Victory, Mr. Kristol?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/so-victory-mr-kristol</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><span>As America marks the first anniversary of the troop escalation in Iraq, at least one thing has become clear. Although the “surge” is failing as policy, it seems to be succeeding as propaganda. Even as George W. Bush continues to bump and scrape along the bottom of public approval, significantly more people now believe that we are “winning” the war. </span><br />
<p class="text"><span>What winning really means and whether that vague impression can be sustained are questions that the war’s proponents would prefer not to answer for the moment. Their objective during this election year is simply to reduce public pressure for withdrawal, which is still the choice of an overwhelming majority of voters. </span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/so-victory-mr-kristol">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/so-victory-mr-kristol#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29359">Bill Kristol</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:55:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Conason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">63504 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Kristol, Krauthammer Are Out of Time</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/kristol-krauthammer-are-out-time</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Two conservative <em>Time</em> magazine columnists are on their way out the door: Neither William Kristol nor longtime contributor Charles Krauthammer will be on contract with the magazine starting next month. Mr. Krauthammer confirmed the news to Off the Record, and a spokeswoman for <em>Time</em> said Mr. Kristol’s contract would not be renewed.<br />
<p class="text"><span>And according to two sources familiar with the discussions, <em>Time</em> is in negotiations with <em>National Review</em> editor Ramesh Ponnuru to sign him to a contributor contract. Mr. Ponnuru, who in 2006 published <em>The Party of Death: The Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard for Human Life</em>, has written twice for the magazine over the past month.<span>  </span></span></p>
<p class="text"><span>The exact reasons for the departures of Mr. Krauthammer and Mr. Kristol, both high-profile backers of the Iraq war, are not entirely clear. </span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/kristol-krauthammer-are-out-time">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/kristol-krauthammer-are-out-time#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29359">Bill Kristol</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/44231">Charles Krauthammer</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:15:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62258 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>MondoWeiss</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/33469</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->The death the other day in Lebanon of <a href="http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1154525864908&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull">Uri Grossman, 20, </a>an Israeli soldier and the son of the novelist David Grossman, who has been a peace activist in Israel, underscores a big difference between Israeli society and ours: In Israel, the children of the elite serve in the armed forces. If the 20-year-old son of an American novelist died in Iraq, we would just think, well that kid was a headcase. Privileged children have a choice here. They don't in Israel.

<p>As any fool knows, there is a moral hazard in that imbalance. When the elite make the big decisions, say to go to war, and their children don't face the consequences, they are immunized from one of the heaviest duties of citizenship&#151;getting the knock on the door that Cindy Sheehan got, and David Grossman.</p>

This issue is gnawing at our public life. Last night on Charlie Rose, Richard Holbrooke spat at the neocon militarist Bill Kristol that unlike Holbrooke, Kristol had never been shot at.  In his latest colum for the Israel Policy Forum, M.J. Rosenberg <a href="http://www.ipforum.org/display.cfm?id=6&Sub=15">attacked neocon hawk </a>Charles Krauthammer on the same grounds. 

<blockquote>Krauthammer, who lives in Maryland, does not have to see the faces of the boys he is so cavalier about sending into battle against fanatical terrorists.  </blockquote>

<p>Readers of this blog know that I often look at the American power structure in religious terms: I think that the new establishment is basically affluent WASPs and affluent Jews, working fine together. So, let's look at the composition of the American armed forces in religious terms.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/33469#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29359">Bill Kristol</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29358">David Grossman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24689">Israel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29012">Richard Holbrooke</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:09:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33469 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s Kristol Clear: Bill&#039;s a Hypocrite</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/45572</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Like an earthquake or explosion that tears away the façade of man-made structures, the fall of Enro <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/45572">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/45572#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29359">Bill Kristol</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31911">Enron Corporation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/43262">Lawrence Kudlow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/36220">The Weekly Standard Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2002 19:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Conason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45572 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
