<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Beverly Moss Spatt</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29662/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Ranks Break at Landmarks Over 2 Columbus Circle</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/33787</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://www.observer.com/therealestate/EDSTONE.jpg" align="right" hspace="10" border="1" alt="406 w 31" >Sherida E. Paulson, former chair of the Landmarks Preservation Commission (2001-03), wrote an Op Ed in July 30's <em>New York Times</em> on the fate of 2 Columbus Circle, the vaguely Moorish-looking monolith designed by Edward Durrell Stone which is in danger of having its facade ripped off and replaced by a modernistic response to the Time Warner Center.

<p>Ms. Paulson, who refers to Stone's controversial masterpiece in the Op Ed as "the black hole of Columbus Circle," said that " ... preservationists have pressed with new urgency to have the the building designated a landmark. But 2 Columbus Circle simply doesn't qualify. That is the professional judgment of the 19 people, myself included, who have served on the New York Landmarks Commission since 1996."</p>

But--oh damn--one of those 19 people, current L.P.C. commissioner Roberta Brandes Gratz, wrote back to The Times on Aug. 6, saying, "Neither I as an individual commissioner nor the current commission as a whole has rendered a 'professional' judgment on whether there should be a hearing or a designation."

<em>Snap!</em>

<p>Adding fuel to the fire was a letter, on the same day, from Beverly Moss Spatt. Who is Ms. Spatt, you ask? Only the chair of the L.P.C. from 1974 to 1978!! She wrote that she "find[s] it difficult to believe that the 19 commission members since 1996 could have reached an absolute consensus that the building is unworthy of even a public hearing to weigh its merits."</p>

"If such overwhelming consensus is indeed the case, where is the public record of this decision? The failure to hold a hearing is a distressing sign of how out of touch the current commission is with the public it serves."

<em>Double snap!</em>

<em>- Matthew Grace</em><div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/33787#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29662">Beverly Moss Spatt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27966">Columbus Circle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29661">Edward Durrell Stone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29591">L.P.C.</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 04:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33787 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
