<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Will Smith</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40964/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Is Seven Pounds The New  Pay It Forward?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/seven-pounds-new-pay-it-forward</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>We learned a long time ago to always, <em>always</em> take Will Smith seriously. The man can do anything - fight aliens or zombies, be Ali, love German shepherds, etc. Mr. Smith is on a winning streak: last year <em><a href="/2008/arts-culture/look-out-new-york-i-i-am-legend-returns">I Am Legend</a></em> <a href="/2008/arts-culture/look-out-new-york-i-i-am-legend-returns">made a truckload of money</a>. Ditto last summer's <em>Hancock (</em>which we maintain was secretly Jason Bateman's movie, but whatever). But now we've come upon the trailer for actor's next film, <em>Seven Pounds.</em> The story, as far as we can tell, is about a man who did something <em>really</em> bad (we'll guess murderous drunk driving) and is possibly suicidal over it. But he looks for redemption when he decides to change seven strangers lives. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/seven-pounds-new-pay-it-forward">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/seven-pounds-new-pay-it-forward#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52154">I Am Legend</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28061">Rosario Dawson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40964">Will Smith</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:26:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sara Vilkomerson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76131 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Look Out New York! I Am Legend Returns </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/look-out-new-york-i-i-am-legend-returns</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Uh oh. Last December <a href="/2007/i-am-legend-freaked-me-out">we wrote about how much <em>I am Legend</em> freaked us out</a> (seriously, we think the workout our heart got during the film qualifies as aerobic activity). The movie, based on the 1954 Richard Matheson book and starring Will Smith, laid out a vision of New York City almost completely wiped out of humans after the spread of a virus (thanks a lot, Emma Thompson!). The movie left us wondering if we should move to an apple farm in Vermont or, at the very least, go ahead and get that German shepherd. &#160;Since the film made $584 million dollars internationally, it's probably not so surprising that <em><a href="http://www."></a></em> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/look-out-new-york-i-i-am-legend-returns">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/look-out-new-york-i-i-am-legend-returns#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57443">German shepherds</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52154">I Am Legend</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28797">Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40964">Will Smith</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:50:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sara Vilkomerson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">75890 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Single Person&#039;s Movie: Bad Boys</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/single-persons-movie-bad-boys</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>It's 2 AM and you awake with a jerk, alone in your fully-lit  apartment and still on the couch. On TV, the credits of some movie you've  already seen a billion times are scrolling by. It feels like rock bottom. And we  know, because we're just like you: single.</em>
<p><em>Need a movie to keep you company until you  literally can't keep your eyes open? Join us tonight when we pass out to</em> <em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svhvEtidI30&amp;NR=1">Bad Boys</a> (starting @ 12:00 on HBO-Z - TWC 206)</em></p>
<p><em>Why we'll try to stay up and watch it: </em>It's hard to remember now, but there was a time way back in the mid-nineties when Will Smith wasn't the biggest star in the world. It's true! In 1995, he was just another successful television actor trying to segue into movies. And what better way to start your career as an A-lister than with a hard-R action/buddy comedy where you get second billing to Martin Lawrence! <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/single-persons-movie-bad-boys">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/single-persons-movie-bad-boys#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53210">Martin Lawrence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/42093">Michael Bay</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40964">Will Smith</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:12:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Rosen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">75108 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Terrence Howard on Men&#039;s Fashion: Zipper Cuffs, Custom-Made Suits, and More Color, Please!</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/style/terrence-howard-depressed-mens-fashion</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>When <strong>Terrence Howard</strong>, the brown-eyed actor with the pencil mustache, arrived Wednesday evening at the subterranean level of Bloomingdale’s for the “Beat of Chic” party thrown by <em>Vanity Fair</em>, he was positively giddy. Thrilled, actually. Tonight he<span> </span>would perform songs from his debut album, <em>Shine Through It</em>, a combination of jazz and soft rock that he recorded with a group of musicians (subtly) called The Band of Kings.
<p>&quot;They greeted me as if I was George Clooney or something!&quot; said Mr. Howard, seeming genuinely surprised by the attention he received upon entering.</p>
<p>&quot;It's really a music lover's album,&quot; he told the Daily Transom. &quot;I love flutes and clarinets and the viola. I love intricate arrangements that paint a picture. The music is intended to paint the most beautiful pictures.&quot;  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/style/terrence-howard-depressed-mens-fashion">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/style/terrence-howard-depressed-mens-fashion#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">Style</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27871">Robert Downey Jr.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53706">Terrence Howard</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40964">Will Smith</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:34:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Irina Aleksander</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74614 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Manhattan Weekend Box Office: Sex and the City vs. The Wackness on New York Screens</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/manhattan-weekend-box-office-i-sex-and-city-i-vs-i-wackness-i-new-york-screens</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Things went much as predicted this Fourth of July weekend. New Yorkers fell in love with a homeless wino with a penchant for busting road signs and throwing live whales into the ocean. <em>Hancock</em> landed on top of Manhattan's sales charts with an $850,956 box office showing. It was the same story nationally. Sony's film scored $66 million in ticket sales, putting it way ahead of <em>Wall-E</em> ($33.4 million) and <em>Wanted</em> ($20.6 million). Since first hitting theaters on July 2, Will Smith's jaded superhero has made a total of $107.3 million.</p>
<p>Much like his alky antihero, Smith is a force to be reckoned with. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/manhattan-weekend-box-office-i-sex-and-city-i-vs-i-wackness-i-new-york-screens">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/manhattan-weekend-box-office-i-sex-and-city-i-vs-i-wackness-i-new-york-screens#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51255">Manhattan Weekend Box Office</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26911">Sarah Jessica Parker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/sex-and-city">Sex and The City</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55712">The Wackness</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40964">Will Smith</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.observer.com/files/mwbo070408.jpg" length="62508" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:27:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John S.W. MacDonald</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71594 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Administrators at Will Smith&#039;s School Say It Doesn&#039;t Teach Scientology</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/style/school-administrators-will-smiths-school-say-it-does-not-teach-scientology</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Despite employing teachers who are members of the Church  of Scientology and using teaching methods developed by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard, administrators at Will Smith's new private school insist that it isn't a Scientology school. </p>
<p>Both Mr. Smith and Jada Pinckett Smith say they do not belong to the church and the New Village School's director, Jacqueline Olivier, <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-me-newvillage29-2008jun29,0,7186141.story" target="_blank">told</a> <em>The Los Angeles Times</em>' Carla Rivera that while some of its staff members are Scientologists, the school has no religious affiliation. Members of its staff are also Muslim, Christian, and Jewish. </p>
<p>&quot;We are a secular school and just like all nonreligious independent schools, faculty and staff do not promote their own religions at school or pass on the beliefs of their particular faith to children,&quot; she said. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/style/school-administrators-will-smiths-school-say-it-does-not-teach-scientology">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/style/school-administrators-will-smiths-school-say-it-does-not-teach-scientology#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">Style</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25037">Church of Scientology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51776">Jada Pinkett Smith</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40964">Will Smith</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:40:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Irina Aleksander</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71399 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Expert: Rules of Engagement for Paparazzi, Scientology</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/expert-rules-paparazzi-engagement-how-survive-scientology</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p class="MsoNormal">Last week, celebrity life coach <strong>Patrick Wanis</strong>, PhD, wanted to tell our readers his list of the <a href="http://nyobserver.com/2007/expert-top-ten-celebrity-meltdowns-2007" target="_blank">Top Ten</a> Celebrity Meltdowns of 2007.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Today, on the phone with the Daily Transom, he got a little more daring. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">First up: recent news that <strong>Lindsay Lohan</strong> has started to <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2007/12/17/2007-12-17_lindsay_lohans_back_in_pictures.html" target="_blank">use the paparazzi</a> to her own advantage, setting up and pocketing proceeds from snaps of her own mug. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“I say kudos to her!” he said. “I was thinking last week, <em>Why don’t celebrities just use their brain?</em>” <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/expert-rules-paparazzi-engagement-how-survive-scientology">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/expert-rules-paparazzi-engagement-how-survive-scientology#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">Style</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27750">Julia Roberts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/lindsay-lohan">Lindsay Lohan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26228">Mike Huckabee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51452">Patrick Wanis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28375">Tom Cruise</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40964">Will Smith</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:34:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Foxley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62121 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Scientists Debunk Legend</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/scientists-debunk-legend</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>So no action movie is ever going to take science seriously in its plotting. But <em>I Am Legend</em>, this weekend's top Manhattan movie, sparks some interesting ethical and scientific research issues. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/worst_case_scenarios/4236920.html?page=4">Popular Mechanics decided to take on Will Smith head on</a>: &quot;<span>Between a highly regimented schedule hunting deer in Times Square with his dog, Sam, and swinging a five-iron from atop a naval cruiser, Neville tries to find a way to reverse the virus using his own immune blood even as the Infected are closing in, setting traps and hunting him. But how much of this sure-to-be blockbuster Hollywood film (based on a famous sci-fi novel) is fact, and how much is fiction? <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/scientists-debunk-legend">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/scientists-debunk-legend#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52154">I Am Legend</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40964">Will Smith</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:11:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62120 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Manhattan Weekend Box Office: Big Willy Style! Who Didn&#039;t Go to the Movies This Weekend?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/manhattan-weekend-box-office-big-willy-style-who-didnt-go-movies-weekend</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The lethal combination of Will Smith in the tentpole apocalypse-drama <em>I Am Legend </em>(No. 1), the nasty weather enveloping the Northeast, and nothing good happening on TV (which translates to nothing good saved for weekend DVR watching) created one of the healthiest weekends for Hollywood in some time. In Manhattan, who <em>didn’t</em> go to the movies? Each movie, save one, <em>Enchanted</em> (No. 8), averaged over the all-important $10,000 waterline, not to mention the behemoth $1 million-plus take of <em>Legend</em>, which broke the national box office record for a December opening with $76 million in receipts. Yowza!      <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/manhattan-weekend-box-office-big-willy-style-who-didnt-go-movies-weekend">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/manhattan-weekend-box-office-big-willy-style-who-didnt-go-movies-weekend#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/36090">Francis Ford Coppola</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52154">I Am Legend</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52337">Jason Lee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32480">Orson Welles</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40964">Will Smith</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.observer.com/files/121707_nielsen_chart.jpg" length="49410" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:35:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jake Brooks</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62099 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Will Smith Foundation Donated $20,000 to Scientology</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/will-smith-foundation-donated-scientology</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Rumors suggesting that <strong>Will Smith</strong> is a Scientologist have been swirling and growing as he is seen in public more and more with <strong>Tom Cruise</strong>, a well-known member of the organization. There was even <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/12142007/gossip/pagesix/gotta_believe_268921.htm" target="_blank">an item</a> about it on Page Six today. But now, the likelihood that the <em>I Am Legend</em> star is in fact an<strong> L. Ron Hubbard</strong> disciple seems a bit greater. It turns out the Will Smith Foundation, which gives away hundreds of thousands of dollars to various causes, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,316808,00.html" target="_blank">donated $20,000</a> to the Church of Scientology’s home-schooling program, called the Hollywood Education and Literacy Program. Recently on <em>Access Hollywood</em>, Mr. Smith reiterated what he told <em>Men’s Vogue</em>, saying, “I was introduced [to] it by Tom and I’m a student of world religion.” </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/will-smith-foundation-donated-scientology#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">Style</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25037">Church of Scientology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52154">I Am Legend</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28375">Tom Cruise</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40964">Will Smith</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52297">Will Smith Foundation</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:55:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Foxley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62031 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
