<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; The New York Times</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Times A.M.E. Bill Schmidt Transfers to International Herald Tribune</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-m-e-bill-schmidt-transfers-international-herald-tribune</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Bill Schmidt, an assistant managing editor and 27-year <em>New York Times</em> veteran, is moving to the <em>International Herald Tribune </em>to become the paper's &quot;Editor, Global editions.&quot; </p>
<p>Mr. Schmidt is the administration-man of the <em>Times </em>newsroom—the one who sends out emails reminding reporters to file their expenses—and he'll have a similar, if expanded, role at <em>The</em> <em>Times'</em> sister publication<em>.</em> Bill Keller writes in a memo, &quot;He will be, in effect, the chief operating officer of the <em>Trib</em> newsroom, the principle liaison with the publisher and with the Executive Editor of The Times.&quot;</p>
<p>Memo after the jump: <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-m-e-bill-schmidt-transfers-international-herald-tribune">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-m-e-bill-schmidt-transfers-international-herald-tribune#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/bill-keller">Bill Keller</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28663">Bill Schmidt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:36:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72294 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sexton Says: &#039;Love Jersey&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/sexton-says-love-jersey</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The <em>New York Times' </em>Metro report will <a href="/2008/no-funeral-yet-times-weddings">write more</a> about food and sex than ever and it will <a href="/2008/no-funeral-yet-times-weddings">write less</a> about New Jersey than it has in years. This news officially comes <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/21/business/media/21askthetimes.html?pagewanted=all">in response</a> to a reader's inquiry to Metro editor Joe Sexton: &quot;Do you cover Jersey anymore?&quot; Sexton's response in today's nytimes.com Q &amp;A: &quot;Ouch. But Jersey? Love Jersey.&quot;</p>
<p>After explaining that the <em>Times'</em> stellar local reporter David Kocieniewski would stay on the Jersey beat&mdash;presumably when Mr. Sexton isn't busy assigning him to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/11/nyregion/11rangel.html?em">investigative pieces</a> on Charlie Rangel's real-estate ownership&mdash;he lays out Metro's future &quot;pledge&quot; to Jersey, Connecticut, Westchester and Long Island now that the bureaus have been emptied out. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/sexton-says-love-jersey">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/sexton-says-love-jersey#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56045">David Kocieniewski</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25924">Joe Sexton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:17:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72244 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is The Times Metro Section Planning a Sex Beat?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-metro-section-planning-sex-beat</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>When <em>The New York Times</em> Metro section reorganized earlier this year—one staffer <a href="/2008/david-chen-named-times-city-hall-bureau-chief-are-regional-bureaus-dead">described</a> it as &quot;retrenchment&quot;—and killed off the regional bureaus in favor of more city-centric beats, one senior newsroom source told <em>The Observer</em> that there was an idea for a sex beat for Metro. </p>
<p>In a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/21/business/media/21askthetimes.html?pagewanted=all">Q&amp;A</a> on nytimes.com today, Joe Sexton (hold your jokes please!) seems to confirm that.</p>
<p>When answering a question about Metro's new mission, Mr. Sexton said: &quot;Jim Dwyer, our gifted <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/d/jim_dwyer/index.html">About New York columnist</a>, likes to say there are three great, inextinguishable human needs: food, sex and stories. We're going to keep the stories coming, likely including many about food and sex (don't wince yet!)&quot;</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-metro-section-planning-sex-beat#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25924">Joe Sexton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52949">Metro</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:25:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72141 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Arthur Sulzberger, Jr. on Rupert Murdoch: Competitors &#039;Can&#039;t Steal Our Readers&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/arthur-sulzberger-jr-were-not-going-change-because-murdoch</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>Ad Age</em> scored an extremely rare <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=129774">interview</a> with Arthur Sulzberger Jr. today. It's good placement for <em>The New York Times</em> publisher and chairman: his company is days away from releasing second-quarter earnings results, which aren't looking particularly great. Some good press is a welcome event since this year has arguably been one of Mr. Sulzberger's most challenging as publisher. The paper <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/business/media/17cnd-times.html?pagewanted=print">lost money</a> last quarter; he's <a href="/2008/after-33-years-pinch-separtes-his-wife-gail-gregg">getting divorced</a> from his wife; the paper experienced <a href="/2008/layoffs-times-and-keller-says-we-hope-worst-behind-us">lay offs</a> in the newsroom for the first time.</p>
<p>But you won't find any mention of the divorce in the profile, and only a small bit on the company's terrible year. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/arthur-sulzberger-jr-were-not-going-change-because-murdoch">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/arthur-sulzberger-jr-were-not-going-change-because-murdoch#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/arthur-sulzberger-jr">Arthur Sulzberger Jr.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:14:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72137 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Report: Times Spikes McCain Iraq Editorial [Update]</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/report-times-spikes-mccain-iraq-editorial</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Last week presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama contributed an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/14/opinion/14obama.htm">op-ed</a> to <em>The New York Times</em> headlined &quot;My Plan for Iraq.&quot;</p>
<p>In it, Senator Obama wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Unlike Senator John McCain, I opposed the war in Iraq before it began, and would end it as president. I believed it was a grave mistake to allow ourselves to be distracted from the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban by invading a country that posed no imminent threat and had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.</p></blockquote>
<p>According to <a href="/drudgereport.com/flashnym.htm">The Drudge Report</a>, Mr. Obama's Republican rival, Senator John McCain, attempted to file a rebuttal but didn't make it past <em>The Times</em> editorial board. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/report-times-spikes-mccain-iraq-editorial">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/report-times-spikes-mccain-iraq-editorial#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55991">David Shipley</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26961">Matt Drudge</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:38:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72132 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Black and White, Red All Over: Is 2008 the Worst Year in Modern Newspaper History?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/black-and-white-red-all-over-2008-worst-year-modern-newspaper-history</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><span>On Wednesday morning at 11 a.m., Arthur Sulzberger and Janet  Robinson will be managing a conference call that, from the looks of it, won't be much fun. </span>
 
<span>They'll be reporting The New York Times Company's  second-quarter earnings. Last time they did one of quarterly earnings calls,  <em>The Times</em> reported big losses; there was a plan to cut 100 newsroom jobs, some through straight-up layoffs rather than superannuation and retirement deals.</span>
 
<span>And in the past few weeks, it's only gotten worse: the company's stock has fallen to  a decade low, and tumbled more than 15 percent in just this month. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/black-and-white-red-all-over-2008-worst-year-modern-newspaper-history">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/black-and-white-red-all-over-2008-worst-year-modern-newspaper-history#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/arthur-sulzberger-jr">Arthur Sulzberger Jr.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55755">Katharine Weymouth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24671">News Corporation Ltd.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/sam-zell">Sam Zell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52585">The Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24267">The New York Times Company</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55295">The Tribune Company</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50050">The Washington Post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24257">The Washington Post Company</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:08:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72099 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Times vs. Journal Digital Battle Royale! Landman Says WSJ Has Done &#039;Nothing&#039; With Its Web Site</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-and-journal-digital-battle-royale-landman-says-journal-has-done-nothing-its-web-sit</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It's a late, sleepy summer Friday, but <em>New York Times </em>online editor Jon Landman has some choice words for Rupert Murdoch, Robert Thomson and <em>The</em> <em>Wall Street Journal</em>'s online editor, Alan Murray, this afternoon. </p>
<p>Well, technically speaking, he doesn't name any of those people in his weekly memo, or the paper itself, but in his weekly briefing designed to discuss accomplishments for <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">nytimes.com</a>, he comes out swinging! Namely, he says <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/us">wsj.com</a> has accomplished nothing! </p>
<p>As Mr.Landman writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>There's some financial newspaper out there, on Wall Street or maybe in midtown, we aren't sure. There's new ownership, it seems, some rich guy who says he wants his paper to be more like ours. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-and-journal-digital-battle-royale-landman-says-journal-has-done-nothing-its-web-sit">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-and-journal-digital-battle-royale-landman-says-journal-has-done-nothing-its-web-sit#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27888">Jon Landman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54665">Robert Thomson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:43:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72090 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Times Pitches Tents </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/ny-times-goes-full-hog-portable-real-estate</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Merely a coincidence, or does <em>The New York Times</em> editorial staff foresee an imminent real estate apocalypse?
<p>For the second time this week, <em>The Times</em> has run a story about portable, one-man tents (the better to shelter us  when the city comes to resemble Cormac McCarthy's <em>The Road</em>).</p>
<p>Two days ago, the paper's business section reported on the so-called &quot;<a href="/2008/real-estate/motel-bag-portable-real-estate-travel-weary">Mini Motel</a>,&quot; a one-man tent complete with air mattress, night light and alarm clock for those unlucky souls marooned at O'Hare with no hotel voucher to temper the inconvenience.</p>
<p>Today, the paper ran a story on the latest technologies in one-man tents -- not for camping inside transit hubs, but for camping outdoors. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/ny-times-goes-full-hog-portable-real-estate">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/ny-times-goes-full-hog-portable-real-estate#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55934">tents</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:24:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Dana Rubinstein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72010 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New York Times Company Stock Plunges 15 Percent in One Week</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/new-york-times-company-stock-plunges-15-percent-one-week</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>NYT Co. stock <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:NYT">took another</a> nosedive today, dropping 2.73 percent to $12.85. That means in the last week, Times Company stock has fallen $2.21, or 15 percent. </p>
<p>The big hit came after Craig Huber, an analyst at Lehman Brothers, wrote to investors last week: &quot;We continue to think the board and management would think long and hard about selling assets and repurchasing shares again until it gets a much better handle on where the fundamentals of the newspaper industry are going.&quot;</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/new-york-times-company-stock-plunges-15-percent-one-week#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/arthur-sulzberger-jr">Arthur Sulzberger Jr.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28669">Janet Robinson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:39:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71913 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Newspaper Industry&#039;s Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day Continues</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/newspaper-industrys-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-day-continues</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>As you may already know, yesterday was a <a href="/2008/media/another-hideous-day-newspapers">dark day</a> for the newspaper industry: Layoffs at <em>The Los Angeles Times</em>; buyouts at <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>; the departure of <em>The Chicago Times</em>' editor-in-chief; <em>The New York Times</em>' stock price dipped to a decade-low as shares of McClatchy, Gannett, and News, Corporation also took hits.</p>
<p>Today, the hits just keep on coming. Some lowlights after the jump: <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/newspaper-industrys-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-day-continues">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/newspaper-industrys-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-day-continues#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55858">Ann Marie Lipinski</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28932">David Hiller</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/sam-zell">Sam Zell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:33:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71856 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
