<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Landmarks Preservation Commission</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49887/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>St. Vincent&#039;s Weighs In: Support For New Hospital &#039;Universal&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/st-vincents-response</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>St. Vincent’s public affairs office gave us a call about <a href="http://admin.observer.com/2008/real-estate/st-vincents">our post</a> on the Landmarks Preservation Commission’s meeting Tuesday on the hospital’s hardship application to demolish the O’Toole building and construct a new, “state-of-the-art” medical facility in its place.<br />
<p class="MsoNormal">Dr. George Neuman, the interim chief medical officer at <a href="http://www.svcmc.org/default.cfm">St. Vincent Catholic Medical Center</a>, said that “support for the new hospital among the doctors and nurses, maintenance and ancillary staff is universal.” </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“The people here want to see a new hospital built,” he said. “When you think about it, who wouldn’t want to work in a new building?&quot;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dr. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/st-vincents-response">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/st-vincents-response#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49887">Landmarks Preservation Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55944">O&amp;#039;Toole Building</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54652">Rudin Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55259">St. Vincent&amp;#039;s Hospital</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50378">West Village</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:39:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lysandra Ohrstrom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72029 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&#039;The Sign Will Live&#039; at Domino Sugar Refinery</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/sign-will-live-domino-sugar-refinery</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The Landmarks Preservation Commission approved revised plans for a massive development at the Domino Sugar Refinery in Williamsburg, <a href="http://www.brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2008/06/inside_the_lpc.php">Brownstoner reported</a> just before noon after blogging live from the hearing all morning. Most importantly &quot;the sign will live,&quot; said an architect for the project.
<p>The LPC has sent the developers back to the drawing board <a href="http://www.wgpa.us/2008/03/lpc_to_domino_not_yet_1.html">twice since February</a>, after the first set of plans that would have added a five-floor glass addition to the recently landmarked factory without preserving the iconic Domino Sugar sign drew the ire of preservationists. </p>
<p>This time around, the LPC's reaction was verging on jubilant.  </p>
<p>&quot;LPC chairman Robert Tierney says he's really digging the new submission,&quot; Brownstoner's Gabby Warshawer wrote. &quot;Tierny calls it a 'brilliant' adaptive plan, says the addition is now 'appropriate,' particularly since the Domino sign is being preserved. Calls the chutes 'dramatic and evocative.' Another commissioner says the design will 'rival the Tate'.&quot;</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/sign-will-live-domino-sugar-refinery#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55608">Domino Sugar Refinery</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49887">Landmarks Preservation Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24281">Williamsburg</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:02:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lysandra Ohrstrom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71126 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>St. Vincent&#039;s Presents Hardship Application to Landmarks Commission</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/st-vincents</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>St. Vincent<span>’s Hospital in the West Village presented its application for hardship status to the Landmarks Preservation Commission today to get permission to demolish the O’Toole building on Seventh Avenue and construct a new facility in its place.</span><br />
<p class="MsoNormal">The hospital set out to convince the LPC to reverse its decision to forbid the demolition of the 1964 building, on the grounds that the physical limitations of the current facility between 11th and 12th streets is preventing it from carrying out its charitable mission to area residents. A trio of health care professionals testified at the hearing, painting a bleak picture of the current conditions at the hospital. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>In <a href="/2008/st-vincent-s-rudins-try-try-again-west-village">May, the LPC pushed back against</a> a $1.6 billion development proposal submitted by St. Vincent’s and its development partner Rudin Management that would have demolished nine buildings owned by the hospital and replaced them with a 329-foot-tall hospital and 265-foot luxury condo tower. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>In keeping with the LPC’s recommendations, Rudin’s revised proposal would preserve and renovate four of the buildings it wanted to demolish on the east side of Seventh Avenue and reduce the scale of the condo tower by 60 feet in height and 30 feet in width. </span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/st-vincents">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/st-vincents#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49887">Landmarks Preservation Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54652">Rudin Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50449">St. Vincent&amp;#039;s</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54651">William Rudin</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:48:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lysandra Ohrstrom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70097 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>City Hall Protest Calls for Landmarks Funding</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/budget-cuts-would-slash-already-meager-funding-new-landmarked-buildings-districts-protestors</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Lost in the dust-cloud hovering above today's Upper East Side crane collapse was yesterday's protest on the steps of City Hall, during which preservationists asked the city to restore $300,000 in funding to the Landmarks Preservation Commission.
<p>That commission is responsible for designating, and thereby protecting from alteration, city landmarks and landmarked districts. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“During the last two years, increased funding has enabled the LPC to hire more employees, and as a result, the commission designated 26 landmarks and four historic districts,” said Lisa Kersavage, director of advocacy for the Municipal Art Society, in a statement.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The jobs of five such employees are now at risk, thanks to proposed funding cutbacks, according to the Society. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/budget-cuts-would-slash-already-meager-funding-new-landmarked-buildings-districts-protestors">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/budget-cuts-would-slash-already-meager-funding-new-landmarked-buildings-districts-protestors#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49887">Landmarks Preservation Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26414">Municipal Art Society</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 13:40:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Dana Rubinstein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69934 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nouvel Tower &#039;Frightening&#039;: Assemblyman Gottfried Joins Anti-Nouvel Crowd</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/gottfried-jumps-aboard-anti-nouvel-moma-tower-train</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p class="MsoNormal">Assemblyman Richard Gottfried has come out against Pritzker Prize-winning architect Jean Nouvel’s <a href="http://www.53w53.com/">tower </a>planned to rise next to the Museum of Modern Art,<a href="/2008/nouvel-speaks-community-unmoved-moma-tower-saga-will-go"> joining neighbors</a> and State Senator Liz Krueger in their opposition to the project.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/gottfried-jumps-aboard-anti-nouvel-moma-tower-train">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/gottfried-jumps-aboard-anti-nouvel-moma-tower-train#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33512">Jean Nouvel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49887">Landmarks Preservation Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54320">Liz Kreuger</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51706">Museum of Modern Art</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51225">PUBLIC POLICY</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26867">Richard Gottfried</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:20:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eliot Brown</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67965 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Landmarks Tosses 125th Street A Bone</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/lpc-put-two-libraries-125th-landmark-track-today</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The Landmarks Preservation Commission unanimously voted to hold hearings on a pair of New York Public Library branches in Harlem, putting them on track toward landmark designation. The move is presumably aimed at placating critics who have faulted the LPC for neglecting Harlem ahead of the anticipated rezoning of 125th   Street. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/lpc-put-two-libraries-125th-landmark-track-today">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/lpc-put-two-libraries-125th-landmark-track-today#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49943">Harlem</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49887">Landmarks Preservation Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28121">Michael Henry Adams</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31816">New York Public Library</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:07:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lysandra Ohrstrom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66644 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Webster Hall Landmarked</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/webster-hall-gets-landmarked</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The Landmarks Preservation Commission designated Webster Hall a landmark today at its meeting along with four other buildings and a Midtown hotel, bringing the total number of individual protected sites in the five boroughs to 1,189.<br />
<p class="MsoNormal">The LPC originally recommended the 1886 Webster Hall concert venue and its annex, constructed in 1895, for protective status, following a 2006 survey of 1,300 buildings betwen East Houston and 14th Street, the Bowery/Fourth Avenue and the East River. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/webster-hall-gets-landmarked">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/webster-hall-gets-landmarked#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49887">Landmarks Preservation Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24897">Webster Hall</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:07:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lysandra Ohrstrom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66642 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Landmarks&#039; Marathon Meeting</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/landmarks-marathon-meeting</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The Landmarks Preservation Commission is in the midst of a typically marathon meeting today, which includes the possible landmarking of music venue Webster Hall. We'll have more on the newest designations soon. Here's the meeting's <a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/lpc/downloads/pdf/calendar/03_18_08.pdf">agenda (PDF).</a>
<p>Ever wonder why something is a landmark (and something else is not)? I <a href="/node/36792">sat down with Commission Chairman Robert Tierney</a> last winter.  </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/landmarks-marathon-meeting#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49887">Landmarks Preservation Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24897">Webster Hall</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 13:31:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Acitelli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66622 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Landmarks Commission Snubs Hotel Pennsylvania Again</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/landmarks-commissions-snubs-hotel-pennsylvania-again</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><a href="http://www.hotelpenn.com">Hotel Pennsylvania</a> preservationist <a href="/2007/lonely-fight-hotel-pennsylvania">Gregory Jones</a> recently received a Valentine's Day greeting from the city's Landmarks Preservation Commission--er, more of a Dear John letter, really.
<p>The message, dated Feb. 14, reads: &quot;At this time, the property does not appear to meet the criteria for designation and will not be recommended to the full commission for further consideration as a New York City landmark.&quot;</p>
<p>Yet, Mr. Jones, who has spearheaded <a href="/2007/vote-conscience-cb5-moves-protect-hotel-pennsylvania-baby-you-got-somethin-goin">efforts to save the old hotel</a> from <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/11152007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/dont_save_midtowns_monster_670452.htm?page=0">possible demolition</a>, remains undaunted: &quot;We won't take no for an answer,&quot; he told <em>The Observer</em> via e-mail. &quot;We will continue to find a new way of saving this hotel with or without the [commission's] help.&quot; </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/landmarks-commissions-snubs-hotel-pennsylvania-again#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52672">GREGORY JONES</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31078">Hotel Pennsylvania</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49937">Hotels</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49887">Landmarks Preservation Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49941">Retail</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30193">Steven Roth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29977">Vornado Realty Trust</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:47:22 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Shott</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65514 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Call Glenn Miller To The Stand! History Buffs Request Hearings About Hotel Pennsylvania</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/call-glenn-miller-stand-history-buffs-request-hearings-about-hotel-pennsylvania</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>At least one preservation group is speaking up on behalf of the <a href="/2007/lonely-fight-hotel-pennsylvania">endangered Hotel Pennsylvania</a>.
<p>The Historic Districts Council (HDC) has formally asked the Landmarks Preservation Commission to hold a hearing on proposals to protect the old McKim, Mead &amp; White-designed hotel, which owner Vornado Realty Trust has <a href="http://www.nysun.com/article/60427">threatened to demolish</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp; <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/call-glenn-miller-stand-history-buffs-request-hearings-about-hotel-pennsylvania">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/call-glenn-miller-stand-history-buffs-request-hearings-about-hotel-pennsylvania#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51564">GLENN MILLER</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29814">Historic Districts Council</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31078">Hotel Pennsylvania</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49937">Hotels</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49887">Landmarks Preservation Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29977">Vornado Realty Trust</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:25:02 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Shott</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62972 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
