<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; CBS News</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Lineup for November 12, 2008</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/lineup-november-12-2008</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>John Koblin looks at <a href="http://observer.com/2008/media/top-editors-burnish-own-brands-bylines-books">editors who moonlight as writers</a>, and talks to <em>The New Yorker</em>'s David Remnick who says, &quot;As much as I love editing, reporting and writing is a way for me to get out of the house a little bit, metaphorically... Otherwise, it’s just the apartment and the office.&quot; Plus: <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/no-shelter-storm-economy-quakes-home-mags-teeter">As Economy Quakes, Home Mags Teeter</a>.</p>
<p>Felix Gillette sifts through some recently released <a href="http://observer.com/2008/media/rather-lawyers-charge-heyward-hondled-troopergate-panel"><em>Rather v. CBS</em> documents</a> and unearths some interesting nuggets.  Plus: <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/broke-peacock">Broke as A Peacock!</a></p>
<p>Leon Neyfakh reports on <a href="http://observer.com/2008/media/more-mailer-matters">the Norman Mailer Estate's uneven relationships with Andrew Wylie and Random House</a>. Plus: <a href="http://observer.com/2008/media/remaking-ryan-lizza-s-big-campaign-book-2008">The Remaking of Ryan Lizza's Big Campaign Book 2008</a>.</p>
<p>Plus: <a href="http://observer.com/2008/politics/facebook-administration">Rahm Poked Me!</a>... <a href="http://observer.com/2008/o2/new-york-treasure-whose-value-goes-frankfurt">Penny Arcade</a>... <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/o2/raging-belle">Raging Belle</a>.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/lineup-november-12-2008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/dan-rather">Dan Rather</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29384">David Remnick</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/norman-mailer">Norman Mailer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56641">Penny Arcade</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26503">Rahm Emanuel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25068">Ryan Lizza</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:48:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">78685 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CBS Names Chip Reid New Chief White House Correspondent; Jim Axelrod Moves to New York</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/cbs-names-chip-reid-new-chief-white-house-correspondent-jim-axelrod-moves-new-york</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>CBS News executives today named Chip Reid as the network's new chief white house correspondent. Mr. Reid, a veteran of NBC News, joined CBS is 2007. He previously served as the network's Capitol Hill correspondent, and hit the campaign trail extensively over the past year. </p>
<p>CBS also announced today that the network's erstwhile chief White House correspondent, Jim Axelrod, will become a national correspondent based in New York. </p>
<p><span><span> </span></span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/cbs-names-chip-reid-new-chief-white-house-correspondent-jim-axelrod-moves-new-york">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/cbs-names-chip-reid-new-chief-white-house-correspondent-jim-axelrod-moves-new-york#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/36605">Chip Reid</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:19:29 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">78500 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dan Bartlett Declined to Answer Thornburgh Panel’s Questions About President&#039;s Military Service in 2004, Email Reveals</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/dan-bartlett-declined-answer-thornburgh-panel-s-questions-about-presidents-military-servi</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>More from the <a href="/2008/media/juicy-bits-surfacing-rather-case-2004-cbs-considered-matt-drudge-rush-limbaugh-ann-coulte"><em>Rather v. CBS</em> docs</a>.</p>
<p>On Tuesday, December 7, 2004, former U.S. Attorney General Richard Thornburgh sent an e-mail to Dan Bartlett, then the White House communications director.</p>
<p>At the time, Mr. Thornburgh was heading up an independent panel, established by CBS, to investigate the flawed <em>60 Minutes Wednesday</em> story about President Bush’s service in the Texas Air National Guard, which aired on September 8, 2004.</p>
<p>&quot;As I mentioned on the phone, we are in the homestretch of our assignment and would find it very helpful if we could secure written responses from the President to the following questions so that we can tie up a couple of loose ends,&quot; wrote Mr. Thornburgh.</p>
<p>Mr. Thornburgh then posed eight questions, after the jump: <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/dan-bartlett-declined-answer-thornburgh-panel-s-questions-about-presidents-military-servi">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/dan-bartlett-declined-answer-thornburgh-panel-s-questions-about-presidents-military-servi#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52844">60 Minutes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29015">Dan Bartlett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/dan-rather">Dan Rather</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-w-bush">George W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/58004">Nicolle Wallace</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:46:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">78456 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Juicy Bits Surfacing in Rather Case: In 2004, CBS Considered Matt Drudge, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter Independent Panel</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/juicy-bits-surfacing-rather-case-2004-cbs-considered-matt-drudge-rush-limbaugh-ann-coulte</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>This week, Dan Rather's legal team submitted a memorandum to the judge overseeing Mr. Rather's $70 million civil lawsuit against his former employers, which for the first time made public some of the thousands of documents that CBS has already turned over in the ongoing discovery process.</p>
<p>The Media Mob is still making its way through the thick stack of e-mails, internal memos and transcripts included in this stash. But we were kind of amazed by one document. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/juicy-bits-surfacing-rather-case-2004-cbs-considered-matt-drudge-rush-limbaugh-ann-coulte">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/juicy-bits-surfacing-rather-case-2004-cbs-considered-matt-drudge-rush-limbaugh-ann-coulte#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/ann-coulter">Ann Coulter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/dan-rather">Dan Rather</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:03:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">78425 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Election Night Ratings: ABC Wins in Broadcast; CNN Wins on Cable</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/election-night-ratings-abc-wins-broadcast-cnn-wins-cable</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>On Tuesday night, some 71.5 million viewers tuned in across 14 television networks to watch Senator Barack Obama's victory over Senator John McCain, according to <a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2008/11/election-rating.html"><em>The Hollywood Reporter</em></a>. Overall it was the highest rated election night since 1980.</p>
<p>On broadcast television, ABC News was big winner. On cable, CNN dominated.</p>
<p>The Nielsen numbers for total viewers via THR:</p>
<p><strong>ABC:</strong>            13,135,000</p>
<p><strong>NBC:</strong>            12,018,000</p>
<p><strong>CBS:</strong>            7,829,000</p>
<p><strong>Fox:</strong> 5,137,000</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>CNN:</strong>            12,304,000</p>
<p><strong>Fox News:       </strong>9,044,000</p>
<p><strong>MSNBC:</strong>          5,889,000</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/election-night-ratings-abc-wins-broadcast-cnn-wins-cable#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50811">ABC News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50373">CNN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50760">Fox News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50921">MSNBC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49826">NBC News</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 10:42:38 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">78371 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Claim: Sarah Palin &#039;Did Not Have the Time or Focus to Prepare&#039; For Couric Interview</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/claim-sarah-palin-did-not-have-time-or-focus-prepare-couric-interview</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>And now the fun part begins. </p>
<p><em>The New York Times</em>' Elisabeth Bumiller has an A1-promoted story headlined <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/us/politics/06mccain.html">Internal Battles Divided McCain and Palin Camps</a>, in which she reveals all about the Republican candidates' failed bid for the White House. This comes a day after <em>Newsweek</em> broke new ground on the Governor's <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/167581/page/1">campaign trail spending spree</a> and Carl Cameron told FOX News (FOX News!) that the woman <em>New York Times</em> columnist Bill Kristol <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/15/opinion/15dowd.html">favorably compared to Andrew Jackson</a> didn't know what countries were in NAFTA or that <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWZHTJsR4Bc">Africa is a continent</a>. (This clip comes via <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/11/the-odd-truths.html">Andrew Sullivan</a>.)  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/claim-sarah-palin-did-not-have-time-or-focus-prepare-couric-interview">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/claim-sarah-palin-did-not-have-time-or-focus-prepare-couric-interview#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25100">Andrew Sullivan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28686">Elisabeth Bumiller</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50760">Fox News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53606">Katie Couric</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51702">Newsweek</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56988">Sarah Palin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31635">William Kristol</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:20:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">78361 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Where to Watch Election Night Online</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/where-watch-election-night-online</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The Web is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/03/business/media/03yahoo.html">revving its engine</a> for tomorrow's big night. Here's where you can tune in on your computer and your iPhone:</p>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/">ABC News</a> is offering live streams of its own TV broadcast and they'll have Web cams at the McCain and Obama campaign headquarters. <a href="http://www.cbspressexpress.com/div.php/cbs_news/release?id=19896" target="popup">CBS News</a> will be offering county-by-county, up-to-the-minute results with live blogging, and a simulcast of its TV coverage, starting at 6:30 p.m. Around 2 a.m, Katie Couric will live chat with viewers on <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/" target="popup">CBSNews.com</a> and <a href="http://www.cnet.com/" target="popup">CNET.com</a>. <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27227813" target="_blank">MSNBC has a neat results widget</a>, which posts real-time results to your blog or Facebook profile. <a href="http://www.cnn.com/YourRaces" target="_blank">CNN YourRaces</a> allows you to customize your own tracking tool (with local races too), and then watch the results in real time through CNN's site or on your <a href="http://www."></a> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/where-watch-election-night-online">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/where-watch-election-night-online#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56655">Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50811">ABC News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54806">CNet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50373">CNN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53606">Katie Couric</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50921">MSNBC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57106">New Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57346">Tech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54625">Twitter</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:07:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">78088 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fox News: Everywhere You Want To Be</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/fox-news-everywhere-you-want-be</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>In 1993, <em>Rolling Stone</em> writer Hugh Gallagher forced himself to watch MTV for seven days straight. Mr. Gallagher's reaction to the experience was easily summed up in the headline to his story: &quot;An Experiment in Terror.&quot;</p>
<p>In this week's <em>New Republic</em>, Isaac Chotiner tries a similar (but less immersive) experiment as he watched <a href="http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=e9c136fc-0453-478d-af7f-57586568c960">24 Hours of Fox News</a>. </p>
<p>Writes Mr. Chotiner:</p>
<blockquote><p>As one might expect with Barack Obama so close to the presidency, the channel is in full nuclear meltdown mode; I was afraid the stench of desperation would waft out of the television set and into my studio apartment. Fox is going ballistic for good reason: These days, absolutely nothing is going right—in both declensions of the word. The paroxysms I witnessed hinted at an answer to a critical question: What will the opposition media look like during an Obama administration?</p></blockquote>
<p>Mr. Chotiner calls Fox News &quot;the right's main television outlet,&quot; a risky move since <em>The Washington Post</em> and <em>The New York Times</em> have each found themselves obliged to print corrections for referring to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/23/AR2008102303928.html">Bill O'Reilly as a &quot;right-wing pundit&quot;</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/26/fashion/26pundit.html"><em>Hannity &amp; Colmes</em> as a conservative show</a> in recent weeks. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/fox-news-everywhere-you-want-be">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/fox-news-everywhere-you-want-be#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24672">Bill O&amp;#039;Reilly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51472">Fox News Channel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49968">The New Republic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:02:05 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">78082 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mainstream Media Finally Pay Attention To The Daily Beast</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/mainstream-media-finally-pay-attention-daily-beast</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Sure, it's well past its buzzy <a href="/2008/media/look-back-daily-beasts-first-100-hours">first 100 hours</a>, but that doesn't mean there can't be more coverage of Tina Brown and Barry Diller's three-week-old don't- call-it-a-news-aggregator site, <a href="http://thedailybeast.com/">The Daily Beast</a>.</p>
<p>In today's <em>New York Times</em>, Tim Arango offers a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/27/business/media/27blogs.html">dual (duel?) profile</a> of Ms. Brown and her aggregating sister-in-arms, Arianna Huffington. (And yesterday's <em>Times Magazine</em> featured an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/26/magazine/26wwln-q4-t.html">interview</a> with Christopher Buckley by Deborah Solomon, but that was simply to fill a quota since, it had been nearly a week since Mr. Buckley was written about in <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/14/buckleys-son-leaves-national-review/">The Caucus</a>, the 'Style' <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/fashion/19buckley.html">section</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/weekinreview/19cohen.html">Week in Review</a> or <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/opinion/19rich.html">Op-Ed</a>.)  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/mainstream-media-finally-pay-attention-daily-beast">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/mainstream-media-finally-pay-attention-daily-beast#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53495">Arianna Huffington</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57595">The Daily Beast</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26294">Tina Brown</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:02:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">77583 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lawyer Representing Thornburgh Panel Joins Rather and CBS in Court</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/lawyer-representing-thornburgh-panel-joins-rather-and-cbs-court</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Dan Rather was back in court Tuesday afternoon for another round in his $70 million lawsuit against CBS.</p>
<p>In the latest development, Mr. Rather's legal team introduced a motion asking the judge for permission to amend their complaint for the second time. Marty Gold, Mr. Rather's lead attorney, said the judge had previously dismissed his client’s fraud charges against CBS on the grounds that no specific damages had been listed in the earlier complaint. Mr. Gold said that this time around his team has prepared a more precise estimate of damages, based on the difference between Mr. Rather's former salary at CBS and his current salary at HDNet. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/lawyer-representing-thornburgh-panel-joins-rather-and-cbs-court">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/lawyer-representing-thornburgh-panel-joins-rather-and-cbs-court#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/dan-rather">Dan Rather</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54225">Justice Ira Gammerman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57651">Thornburgh panel</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:19:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76639 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
