<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; George Clooney</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51055/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Rumor: George Clooney and Johnny Depp to Team Up for The Lone Ranger ?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/rumor-george-clooney-and-johnny-depp-team-lone-ranger</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Yesterday, we <a href="/2008/arts-culture/mouse-house-gets-johnny" target="_blank">found ourselves confused</a> over the news that Johnny Depp would be playing Tonto in a Jerry Bruckheimer-produced <em>The Lone Ranger</em>. Why would such a great actor be willing to play a sidekick role in a silly and unnecessary big-budget adaptation? Now, over at <a href="http://www.aintitcool.com/node/38486" target="_blank">Ain’t-It-Cool News</a>, we might have gotten our answer.</p>
<p>According to a “source,” George Clooney has shown “a lot of interest” in the project, and naturally the feelings are reciprocal from Disney. Obviously all of this is wildly unconfirmed, but it almost makes sense. Perhaps Mr. Depp signed on to the role because he knew he’d get the chance to work with Mr. Clooney. (Or maybe he just wanted the chance to ride a horse.) <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/rumor-george-clooney-and-johnny-depp-team-lone-ranger">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/rumor-george-clooney-and-johnny-depp-team-lone-ranger#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-clooney">George Clooney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/42322">Johnny Deep</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:36:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Rosen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">75930 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clooney Says No To ER</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/clooney-says-no-appearing-i-er-i</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p class="MsoNormal"><span class="c1">For those of you still holding out hope that George Clooney might return for the final season of <em>ER</em></span><span class="c1">, it’s all over. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080923/tv_nm/clooney_dc">Mr. Clooney has once again spurned his former TV show</a>, leaving his publicist to utter one of the great lines of the week: “He is on the record as saying he is not coming back. It is something he has already done. He is busy making movies.” Hilarious! You can practically feel the disdain wafting off the page! The publicist might as well have put “movies” in italics.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span class="c1">We can’t say we really disagree with Mr. Clooney’s decision. He hasn’t appeared on an episode of <em>ER</em></span> <span class="c1">since 2000 and left as a regular cast member in 1999.</span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/clooney-says-no-appearing-i-er-i">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/clooney-says-no-appearing-i-er-i#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57406">ER</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-clooney">George Clooney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50606">Television</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:00:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Rosen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">75781 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Might Affleck Get on the Clooney Track?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/might-affleck-get-clooney-track</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The year that <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0000123/">George Clooney</a> turned 36, he starred in the forgettable <em>The Peacemaker</em> and the unforgettable (in a bad way)  <em>Batman and Robin</em>. Based on those massive duds, it would have been hard to predict that only eleven years later, Mr. Clooney would not only have an Oscar, but also be one of the biggest movie stars in world. We bring up George Clooney's 36th year because we couldn't help but think of it when we read about Ben Affleck's next project. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117992226.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1">The much-maligned actor, who turned 36 just a month ago, has signed up to star in and direct <em>The Town</em></a>. Warner Brothers has an existing script for the film, which is based on the novel <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Prince-Thieves-Novel-Chuck-Hogan/dp/074326455X">Prince of Thieves</a></em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Prince-Thieves-Novel-Chuck-Hogan/dp/074326455X"> by Chuck Hogan</a>, that Mr. Affleck will also re-write. <em>The Town</em> centers on a bank robber who falls into a star-crossed love affair with the manager of the bank he just robbed. Needless to say, things don't go well. </p>
<p>That sounds a little bit like <em><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0120780/">Out of Sight</a></em>, the Steven Soderbergh gem that started George Clooney on his Cary Grant career track.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/might-affleck-get-clooney-track">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/might-affleck-get-clooney-track#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">O2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28536">Ben Affleck</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-clooney">George Clooney</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:51:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Rosen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">75287 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>McGregor, Spacey and Bridges to Join Clooney in Psychic Iraq Movie</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/mcgregor-spacey-and-bridges-join-clooney-psychic-iraq-movie</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Now here's a movie that we're going to see! <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i6e1ea93903c4b3a309fdba32b225ce7b">Ewan McGregor, Jeff Bridges and Oscar-winner Kevin Spacey are in negotiations to star opposite George Clooney in the new film <em>The Men Who Stare at Goats,</em></a><em> </em>based on the book by the same name. Mr. Clooney is producing the film, while his long-time partner, actor Grant Heslov (we loved you in <em>True Lies</em>, Grant!) will handle the directing duties.</p>
<p>The plot sounds like a mixture of the <em>Bourne </em>movies and <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/dawsons-eek-pacey-s-back-flesh-melts-j-j-abrams-latest"><em>Fringe</em></a>. A struggling, down-on-his-luck reporter (Mr. McGregor) meets a man who claims he's a former military psychic soldier who was re-activated post-9/11 (Mr. Clooney). Predictably, the two go on a wild adventure through Iraq to find the truth about the psychic program that may or may not deal with soldiers bending spoons and exploding goats... with their minds! <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/mcgregor-spacey-and-bridges-join-clooney-psychic-iraq-movie">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/mcgregor-spacey-and-bridges-join-clooney-psychic-iraq-movie#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">O2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/34133">Ewan McGregor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-clooney">George Clooney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/36572">Jeff Bridges</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/35118">Kevin Spacey</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:10:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Rosen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">75167 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Coen Brothers’ Burn After Reading Is Too Hot to Handle!  </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/coen-brothers-burn-after-reading-too-hot-handle</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><strong>Burn After Reading</strong><br />
<em>Running time 96 minutes<br />
Written and</em> <em>directed by Joel and Ethan Coen<br />
Starring George Clooney, Brad Pitt, John Malkovich, Frances McDormand, Tilda Swinton</em></p>
<p class="CULTURE3linedrop"><span class="c1">Joel and Ethan Coen’s <em>Burn After Reading</em>, from their own screenplay, strikes me as one of the most willfully awful movies I’ve ever seen. What makes it even worse is that every one of the “name” performances—George Clooney, Brad Pitt, John Malkovich, Frances McDormand, and Tilda Swinton—seem determined to best each other in projecting the idiocy of their caricatured middle-aged losers. Yet the early scenes are not intended for middle-aged audiences, but, rather, for teenage viewers and listeners who can be expected to howl with laughter at every gratuitous use of the F and S four-letter words.</span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/coen-brothers-burn-after-reading-too-hot-handle">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/coen-brothers-burn-after-reading-too-hot-handle#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">O2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28352">Brad Pitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56817">Burn After Reading</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33353">Coen Brothers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40755">Frances McDormand</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-clooney">George Clooney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28101">John Malkovich</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53605">Tilda Swinton</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:55:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrew Sarris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74919 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hey, Variety&lt;/i&gt; ! &lt;i&gt; Burn After Reading Is Hilarious!</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/hey-variety-burn-after-reading-hilarious</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>We here at the Culture Czar happen to be big fans of <em>Variety</em> and particularly of reviewer Todd McCarthy. Many times we’ll read his reviews, nod along, and even make mmmhmmm noises at our desk. Which was why we were shocked (shocked!) to see <a href="http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117938083.html?categoryid=31&amp;cs=1">his review of the Coen brothers new film <em>Burn After Reading</em></a>, which opened the Venice Film Festival last night:</p>
<p>"After their triumphant dramatic success with 'No Country for Old Men,' the Coen brothers revert to sophomoric snarky mode in 'Burn After Reading.' A dark goofball comedy about assorted doofuses in Washington, D.C., only some of whom work for the government, the short, snappy picture tries to mate sex farce with a satire of a paranoid political thriller, with arch and ungainly results. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/hey-variety-burn-after-reading-hilarious">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/hey-variety-burn-after-reading-hilarious#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">O2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55718">Food &amp;amp; Drink</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28352">Brad Pitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56817">Burn After Reading</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-clooney">George Clooney</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:20:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sara Vilkomerson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74084 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clooney, Pitt Do Cute Buddy Routine at Venice, Evade Journalist</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/clooney-pitt-do-cute-buddy-routine-venice-evade-journalist</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>OMG could George Clooney and Brad Pitt please stop being so charming/funny/arch whatever they are? At a Venice Film Festival press conference today promoting the new Coen brothers movie <em>Burn After Reading</em>, the irrepressible duo found themselves answering the same questions we swear they did last year, or at some other press thing.</p>
<p>Reporter to Brad Pitt: Will Clooney ever settle down?</p>
<p>Clooney to reporter: ''I am so surprised to hear that question. That is honestly the first time I have been asked that...I am getting married and having a child today.''</p>
<p>Pitt then told Clooney that he could share his own six-child brood, since he'd "have two more by next year. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/clooney-pitt-do-cute-buddy-routine-venice-evade-journalist">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/clooney-pitt-do-cute-buddy-routine-venice-evade-journalist#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28352">Brad Pitt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33353">Coen Brothers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-clooney">George Clooney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54498">Venice Film Festival</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:34:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Hillary Frey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">73987 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Which Mad Men Woman Has the Best Taste in Men?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/which-i-mad-men-i-woman-has-best-taste-men</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Like everyone else we know, we’ve become a little obsessed with <em>Mad Men</em>. And a late night <a href="http://www.imdb.com/">perusal of IMDB</a> revealed to us the following interesting tidbit: Talia Balsam, who plays Mona Sterling -- wife of the awesomely inappropriate Roger Sterling -- is the real life wife of actor John Slattery, who portrays Roger Sterling. Neat! But, wait there more. Ms. Balsam, whose television credits stretch back to <em>Happy Days,</em> is the niece of Dick Van Patten, and, perhaps more excitingly, the only woman to have married George Clooney. The couple wed after a long courtship in 1989, but split after three years (“Talia and I were together for a long time,” Mr. Clooney told <em>Parade</em> magazine in 1998. “She was the girl I chased and was in love with, the girl I always wanted to marry.”) Mr. Clooney, as we know, has gone on to say he’ll never marry again. Ms. Balsam, on the other hand, married Mr. Slattery, with whom she has a ten-year-old son. This leads us to the conclusion that Talia Balsam has just about the best taste in silver fox men, ever. Madam, we salute you!  </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/which-i-mad-men-i-woman-has-best-taste-men#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-clooney">George Clooney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56692">John Slattery</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52206">Mad Men</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56693">Talia Balsam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50606">Television</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:08:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sara Vilkomerson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">73746 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Showtime Greenlights Clooney&#039;s Fall</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/showtime-greenlights-clooneys-i-fall-i</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>George Clooney's production company will produce a new half-hour comedy for Showtime called <em>The Fall of Bob</em>. The lead character, Bob (obviously), will narrate his life through flashbacks as he propels himself from a building. Morbid stuff. <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117987967.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1">Variety is reporting</a> that Showtime has been busy courting the big names since greenlighting the Steven Spielberg-produced, Diablo Cody-penned <em>United States of Tara</em>.<br />
<blockquote>
<p>The channel also just piloted the darkly comedic &quot;The End of Steve,&quot; from Matthew Perry and  Peter Tolan .</p>
</p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/showtime-greenlights-clooneys-i-fall-i#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">O2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-clooney">George Clooney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52079">Showtime</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:51:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71109 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sarah Larson Loses George Clooney; Gains Ad Campaign </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/sarah-larson-lost-george-clooney-gained-ad-campaign</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Less than a month after <a href="/2008/george-clooney-single-again" target="_blank">breaking things off</a> with George Clooney, Sarah Larson has landed herself an ad campaign modeling a new line of couture dresses by designer Christian Audigier, <a href="http://offtherack.people.com/2008/06/13/sarah-larson-the-new-face-of-christian-audigier/?xid=rss-topheadlines" target="_blank"><em>People</em></a> reported.
<p>Ms. Larson shot the ads on Monday in L.A. Mr. Audigier told the magazine, &quot;She is a fresh, elegant and classy girl. I saw her on a red carpet and liked her style and European look.&quot; </p>
<p>Ms. Larson's agent, Kenya Knight, said, &quot;Sarah was picked by Christian Audigier because she looks fabulous in everything she wears.”  </p>
<p>The ads will be out later this month. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/sarah-larson-lost-george-clooney-gained-ad-campaign#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">O2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-clooney">George Clooney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53465">Sarah Larson</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:53:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Irina Aleksander</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70763 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
