<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Howard Kurtz</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51056/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Twitter Takes Over The World (Because There&#039;s Nothing Newer Yet)</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/twitter-takes-over-world-because-theres-nothing-newer-yet</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Another week, another article about some amazing new communications tool and how it's changing our lives, like, forever!</p>
<p>This time, we're meant to look at the deeper meaning of a new technology that's bringing people closer together, changing the face of advertising and marketing, and even helping make the world a better, safer place.</p>
<p>Per <em>The New York Times</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Here is the beginning of a personal medium which will—in a generation—be as important as any mass medium is today: for back-fence gossiping; for word-of-mouth selling; for citizen participation in fighting crime without getting overly 'involved'; for remote parental control; for two-step opinion information. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/twitter-takes-over-world-because-theres-nothing-newer-yet">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/twitter-takes-over-world-because-theres-nothing-newer-yet#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30956">BusinessWeek Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28332">Clive Thompson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/howard-kurtz">Howard Kurtz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54625">Twitter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28504">William Safire</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:19:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74804 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Greta Van Susteren Does Not Twitter</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/greta-van-susteren-does-not-twitter</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Last week, <em>The Washington Post</em>'s Howard Kurtz <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/25/AR2008082502516.html?sub=AR">wrote</a> about Twitter, the kinda useful, sorta ubiquitous, sure to be short-lived new tool for journalists—and cellphone-enabled journalist-like individuals—who want to bring readers the world in 140-characters or less.</p>
<p>Mr. Kurtz called twittering &quot;the digital equivalent of a sound bite, a throat-clearing, a terse observation or two for a cloistered community online.&quot;</p>
<p>If you're hoping to hear Fox News' Greta Van Susteren clear her throat online, you're out of luck: The <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/ontherecord/"><em>On the Record</em></a> host <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/01/greta-van-susteren-makes_n_122887.html">tells</a> The Huffington Post's Danny Shea that Twittering may not be for her:</p>
<blockquote><p>I'm not sold on it yet... I have so much going—I have a webcam, I have GretaWire, I have Greta LiveWire which is my internet show that I do every night between 9:45 and 9:50, I'm now doing the Strategy Room, I've got my pictures, my video...remember I told you it's that hairline [between being digital and being crazy]? Twitter may be it...  </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>It also sounds mildly obscene. Am I the only one who thinks, like, Twittering... I don't know. Do you Twitter? It's like, I thought we had a don't ask, don't tell policy!</p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/greta-van-susteren-does-not-twitter#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50760">Fox News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/35365">Greta Van Susteren</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/howard-kurtz">Howard Kurtz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52342">The Huffington Post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54625">Twitter</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:24:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74266 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Washington Post&#039;s Leonard Downie, Jr. Retiring in September</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/washington-posts-leonard-downie-jr-retiring-september</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>After months of speculation, <em>The Washington Post</em>'s executive editor Len Downie finally announced to staff today that he's retiring and that his last day will be Sept. 8. The <em>Post</em>'s Howie Kurtz <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/23/AR2008062301440.html?hpid=topnews">is reporting</a> that the <em>Post</em>'s publisher Katharine Weymouth will announce a replacement soon. At a meeting this afternoon, Mr. Downie <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0608/WaPos_Downie_retires_as_editor.html">said,</a> &quot;A new younger publisher needs a new younger editor&quot; and that &quot;it is time for me to retire as editor.&quot;</p>
<p>Kurtz reports on the top candidates, widely known in media circles for about a week now:</p>
<blockquote><p>Those considered to be the strongest contenders for the job are <em>Post</em> Managing Editor Philip Bennett; former <em>Wall Street Journal</em> managing editor Marcus Brauchli, who was ousted in April after Rupert Murdoch took over the paper; and Jonathan Landman, a <em>New York Times</em> deputy managing editor who has run the paper's Metro staff and Week in Review section.</p>
</p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/washington-posts-leonard-downie-jr-retiring-september#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/howard-kurtz">Howard Kurtz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33903">Leonard Downie Jr.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50050">The Washington Post</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:48:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71081 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Everything&#039;s Coming Up Fowler: Mayhill&#039;s Big Weekend</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/everythings-coming-fowler-mayhills-big-weekend</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Who was the big media star of the weekend? The Huffington Post's citizen journalist extraordinaire <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler">Mayhill Fowler</a>, of course! After her rope line &quot;<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/bill-clinton-purdhum-a-sl_b_104771.html">interview</a>&quot; with Bill Clinton made headlines, Ms. Fowler has found herself at the center of a journalistic ethics-new-new-new media kerfuffle. </p>
<p>After the jump, a snapshot of Ms. Fowler's big weekend (as compiled with the help of the redoubtable <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45&amp;aid=144836">Jim Romenesko</a>): <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/everythings-coming-fowler-mayhills-big-weekend">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/everythings-coming-fowler-mayhills-big-weekend#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/bill-clinton">Bill Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/howard-kurtz">Howard Kurtz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51538">Jacques Steinberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55320">Jan Hamsher</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28855">Jim Romenesko</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29019">Jonathan Alter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55316">Mayhill Flower</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52342">The Huffington Post</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:54:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70358 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Times Asks if Howie Kurtz Was Unethical</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/times-asks-if-howie-kurtz-was-unethical</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Jacques Steinberg at <em>The Times</em> poses a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/29/arts/television/29kurt.html">question</a>: Did Howie Kurtz do anything wrong when he brought a client of his wife's onto his show? Kurtz's wife, Sheri Annis, did PR work for Kimberly Dozier's memoir, <em>Breathing the Fire</em>, which was the centerpiece of an interview Dozier had with Kurtz on his CNN show, <em>Reliable Sources</em>. Kurtz made a brief disclosure at the end of the show, but even so, is it kosher? <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/times-asks-if-howie-kurtz-was-unethical">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/times-asks-if-howie-kurtz-was-unethical#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50373">CNN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/howard-kurtz">Howard Kurtz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51538">Jacques Steinberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50220">New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52412">Washington Post</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:58:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69884 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&#039;Shrinkage is Painful,&#039; Says Howie Kurtz about the Washington Post</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/shrinkage-painful-says-howie-kurtz-about-i-washington-post-i</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><span><span>
<p>Here's another online Q&amp;A, this time with the <em>Washington Post's</em> Howie Kurtz. Some choice bits:</p>
<p>&quot;But the shrinkage, as I wrote, is painful, and some of those departing are close to irreplacable.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;I'm an ink-in-the-veins newspaper guy, I believe in newspapers and in The Washington Post. That doesn't mean that those who took the offer don't believe in the paper.&quot;</p>
<p>That might be up for debate.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/shrinkage-painful-says-howie-kurtz-about-i-washington-post-i">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/shrinkage-painful-says-howie-kurtz-about-i-washington-post-i#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/howard-kurtz">Howard Kurtz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50050">The Washington Post</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:54:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69761 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Future of Katie Couric: A Morning Round-Up</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/future-katie-morning-round</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Filling out the rumors floated in yesterday’s <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, today the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/11/business/media/11couric.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=todayspaper&amp;pagewanted=all">reports</a> that a “wide-ranging discussion” about Katie Couric’s future took place among CBS executives back in February: </p>
<p> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/future-katie-morning-round">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/future-katie-morning-round#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50520">CBS News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/howard-kurtz">Howard Kurtz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53606">Katie Couric</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/larry-king">Larry King</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:14:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67728 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bill Clinton&#039;s Impenetrable Press Strategy</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/bill-clintons-impenetrable-press-strategy</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>MYRTLE BEACH, S.C.&mdash;Former President Bill Clinton, the only class-A champion worker of the media here in South Carolina, is up to something. And no one, particularly the press, is exactly sure what he's doing, or why he's doing it.
<p>In Kingstree, around 6 p.m., Bill Clinton was taking questions and doing his Great Explainer thing for an almost entirely African-American audience in a municipal center. In the back of the room, the New York Times' Kit Seelye was typing away at her story that ran today. "Bill Clinton Accuses Obama Camp of Stirring Race Issue" <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/24/us/politics/24dems.html?ref=politics">was the headline</a>, with contributions from two other reporters in other cities and scripts of new campaign ads provided by her editors. The story was largely about Clinton's unexpected (by the media, at least) remarks that took place a bit after 1 p.m. down in Charleston. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/bill-clintons-impenetrable-press-strategy">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/bill-clintons-impenetrable-press-strategy#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/bill-clinton">Bill Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/howard-kurtz">Howard Kurtz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24595">South Carolina</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Choire Sicha</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">64000 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Penn Says What He Thinks the Press Won&#039;t</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/penn-says-what-he-thinks-press-wont</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The enormous cluster of reporters surrounding Mark Penn dispelled any question as to whether last night’s debate was all about Hillary Clinton. It was.</p>
<p>With four Clinton spinners on the spin room floor (Penn, media consultant Mandy Grunwald, and spokesmen Jay Carson and Phil Singer) the Clinton campaign was clearly imbued with what Barack Obama might call “the fierce urgency of now.”</p>
<p>Here’s what Penn was saying, essentially continuing Clinton’s assault on her opponents’ change credentials.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/penn-says-what-he-thinks-press-wont">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/penn-says-what-he-thinks-press-wont#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/howard-kurtz">Howard Kurtz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25614">Mark Penn</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25294">New Hampshire</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:34:54 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">62924 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Washington Post&#039;s Kurtz Criticizes Paper&#039;s Obama Story</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/washington-posts-kurtz-criticizes-papers-obama-story</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>The Washington Post</em>'s Howard Kurtz has weighed in on the <a href="http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/post_75.php">controversy</a> over his paper's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/28/AR2007112802757.html">front-page story</a> last week which gave space to false rumors that Barack Obama is a Muslim.  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/11/30/DI2007113001537.html">Writes Mr. Kurtz</a>, in a WashingtonPost.com chat: </p>
<blockquote><p>It's always a subject of journalistic debate as to when a rumor or smear has gained enough currency that a newspaper should weigh in and debunk it, even at the risk of spreading the original trash. I had debates in this newsroom many times about wanting to knock down some of the Clinton scandal rumors that were gaining currency in tabloids or British papers, and that was before the Internet was the force that it is today.    </p>
 <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/washington-posts-kurtz-criticizes-papers-obama-story">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/washington-posts-kurtz-criticizes-papers-obama-story#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/howard-kurtz">Howard Kurtz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50050">The Washington Post</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:17:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zachary Roth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">61331 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
