<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; BARNES &amp;amp; NOBLE</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51317/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Report: Barnes &amp; Noble Doesn&#039;t Want to Buy Borders</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/report-barnes-noble-doesnt-want-buy-borders</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Citing people familiar with the situation, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121868339009439785.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">reports</a> this morning that Barnes &amp; Noble is not interested in making a bid for Borders, which put itself up for sale in the spring. Rumors that B&amp;N was going to acquire the ankle-biting second-largest-bookstore-chain-in-the-country freaked out everyone in publishing for a minute there, since a merger would almost certainly mean a lot of Borders stores would close and there would thus be way fewer places to sell books.</p>
<p>According to <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>'s Jeffrey A. Trachntenberg and Matthew Karnitschnig, this might not be the end of the story since:</p>
<blockquote><p>To be sure, Barnes &amp; Noble could change tactics and return with a bid, but it would have to act quickly. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/report-barnes-noble-doesnt-want-buy-borders">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/report-barnes-noble-doesnt-want-buy-borders#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51317">BARNES &amp;amp; NOBLE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56522">Borders</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:32:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Leon Neyfakh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">73340 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When You Are Engulfed in Controversy (UPDATE)</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/barnes-noble-reverses-sedaris-engulfed-flames-now-filed-under-non-fiction</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Last week, Barnes &amp; Noble did a funny thing and classified David Sedaris's new book of essays, <em>When You Are Engulfed in Flames</em>, <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/barnes-noble-throws-gauntlet-david-sedaris-says-his-new-book-fiction">under fiction</a> in the weekly best-seller list they send out to publishers. It was a strong move, because Mr. Sedaris had just told <em>Time </em>that he definitely considered it nonfiction. &quot;I've always been a huge exaggerator,&quot; he <a href="/2008/david-sedaris-97-solution">said</a>, &quot;but when I write something, I put it on a scale. And if it's 97% true, I think that's true enough. I'm not going to call it fiction because 3% of it isn't true.&quot; </p>
<p>And so it sorta seemed like B&amp;N was calling Mr. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/barnes-noble-reverses-sedaris-engulfed-flames-now-filed-under-non-fiction">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/barnes-noble-reverses-sedaris-engulfed-flames-now-filed-under-non-fiction#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51317">BARNES &amp;amp; NOBLE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/41698">David Sedaris</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:09:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Leon Neyfakh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70769 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Barnes &amp; Noble Throws a Gauntlet at David Sedaris; Says His New Book is Fiction (UPDATED)</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/barnes-noble-throws-gauntlet-david-sedaris-says-his-new-book-fiction</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>David Sedaris <a href="/2008/david-sedaris-97-solution">insisted last week</a> that his essays, which are famously full of embellishments, should be filed under non-fiction because only about 3% of what he writes is untrue. &quot;I've always been a huge exaggerator,&quot;he said in an online Q&amp;A on <em>Time</em>'s Web site, &quot;but when I write something, I put it on a scale. And if it's 97% true, I think that's true enough. I'm not going to call it fiction because 3% of it isn't true.&quot;</p>
<p>
<p>&nbsp; <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/barnes-noble-throws-gauntlet-david-sedaris-says-his-new-book-fiction">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/barnes-noble-throws-gauntlet-david-sedaris-says-his-new-book-fiction#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51317">BARNES &amp;amp; NOBLE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/41698">David Sedaris</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:09:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Leon Neyfakh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70391 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bohemians at Barnes &amp; Noble: Trippy Turnout for Chelsea Hotel Book</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/bohemians-invade-barnes-noble</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Artsy denizens of the <a href="http://www.nyobserver.com/2007/nasty-checks-chelsea-hotel">embattled Chelsea Hotel</a> turned out en masse to the not-so-bohemian Barnes &amp; Noble on Sixth Avenue and 21st Street last night, as fellow hotel inhabitant <a href="http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&amp;friendid=76627648">Ed Hamilton</a> read passages from his new book, <em><a href="http://www.perseusbookspromos.com/buy.php?ISBN=1568583796">Legends of the Chelsea Hotel</a></em>.
<p>&quot;It's good he decided to dress up,&quot; one attendee joked as Mr. Hamilton took the podium dressed in jeans, a button-up shirt, and a blue baseball cap bearing the logo of a recent New York blogger summit. (Mr. Hamilton also operates a hotel-centric blog called <a href="http://legends.typepad.com/living_with_legends_the_h/">Living With Legends</a>.)</p>
<p>Painter Hawk Alfredson and photographer Mia Hanson (who's also pictured in the book) were among those present. </p>
<p>Before delving into the text, Mr. Hamilton waxed nostaglic for the hotel's old junky-friendly vibe and bemoaned its becoming &quot;more and more of a fancy boutique hotel.&quot; </p>
<p>He described the book as part fact, part fiction. During the reading, Mr. Hamilton pulled from two chapters—&quot;scary stories for Halloween,&quot; he said—one involving a druggie Dead-head zombie reanimated on the hotel's rooftop and another describing a seemingly personal encounter with the purported ghost of writer (and former Room 829 resident) Thomas Wolfe during the 2003 blackout:</p>
<p>&quot;[A] large, hulking man,&quot; Mr. Hamilton described the phantom. &quot;His broad back curved over a drafting table where an array of papers was spread out before him. He seemed to be working on some sort of outline... The man was wearing a starched white shirt, and the papers were white, which added to the brilliance of the scene.&quot; </p>
<p>Later, as the author autographed copies, this reporter asked him how much of the Wolfe ghost story was true. </p>
<p>&quot;Well, it didn't happen during the blackout,&quot; Mr. Hamilton said. And, he added, &quot;I don't know if it was him.&quot; </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/bohemians-invade-barnes-noble#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51317">BARNES &amp;amp; NOBLE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50014">Chelsea</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31340">Chelsea Hotel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51316">ED HAMILTON</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:30:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris Shott</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">59353 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
