<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Manhattan Institute</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51440/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Like Nails on a Blackboard</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/nails-blackboard-0</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It is encouraging to see more and more honest conservatives <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2008/10/04/dumb/">asking themselves hard questions</a> about the candidacy of Sarah Palin and its dumbing down of their party and movement. Some are more honest than others, of course. Clearly David Brooks understands why Palin could be a "fatal cancer" for the Republican Party, but for publication he can't quite muster the <a href="http://www.city-journal.org/2008/eon1013hm.html">bracing forthrightness of the City Journal's Heather Mac Donald</a> (h/t to the <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheat-sheet/#cheatrow_158">Daily Beast</a>). Poor Heather simply can't bear to listen to the hockey mom any more:</p>
<blockquote><p>"I know, it’s elitist to expect a candidate for president or vice president to speak like an adult. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/nails-blackboard-0">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/nails-blackboard-0#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28152">David Brooks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57754">Heather Mac Donald</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51440">Manhattan Institute</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56988">Sarah Palin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:59:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Conason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76938 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What to Do About Those Rising Construction Costs...</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/what-do-about-those-rising-construction-costs</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>As the economy sours, ever-rising construction costs seem to be an in-vogue subject: Last night, the New York Building Congress <a href="http://www.buildingcongress.com/code/costs/rising-costs1.htm">released a report on the topic</a>; the Manhattan Institute <a href="http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/rdr_04.htm">put out recommendations for controlling cost escalations</a> earlier this month; and, on Monday, the Bloomberg administration <a href="http://www.crainsnewyork.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080728/FREE/894789062/1097/toc">announced a set of initiatives</a> to lower costs of city projects.
<p>The basic problem--costs have been going up at least 10 percent annually for the past few years--doesn't seem to have any easy solutions, as the reports (both of which involved consultation with the same firm, <a href="http://www.urbanomics.org/">Urbanomics</a>) recommended a broad array of changes that could lower costs to varying degrees. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/what-do-about-those-rising-construction-costs">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/what-do-about-those-rising-construction-costs#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51440">Manhattan Institute</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26122">New York Building Congress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31045">Robert Lieber</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:08:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eliot Brown</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72628 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Rudy Giuliani Conservatives</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/rudy-giuliani-conservatives</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Rudy Giuliani returned on April 25, 2006, from his first, unofficial forays on the presidential campaign trail to accept an award from the heterodox, New York-based conservatives who made him.<br />
<p class="text">“It’s like coming home,” Mr. Giuliani told the members of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/rudy-giuliani-conservatives">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/rudy-giuliani-conservatives#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51440">Manhattan Institute</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rudolph-giuliani">Rudolph Giuliani</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:16:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">61867 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>At Manhattan Institute, Bloomberg Praises Big Ideas, Denounces Autocratic Urban Planning</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/bloomberg-manhattan-institute</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>I just got a copy of the prepared remarks Michael Bloomberg delivered this morning in midtown to the Manhattan Institute, the conservative think tank that recently was in the news for <a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&amp;ct=us/0-0&amp;fp=47299a9864384a26&amp;ei=RukpR6KdH5isapT18LQK&amp;url=http%3A//www.nytimes.com/2007/10/31/us/politics/31prostate.html%3Fbl%26ex%3D1194062400%26en%3Da040ad66e1b14f8c%26ei%3D5087%250A&amp;cid=1122859053" target="_blank">providing Rudy Giuliani inaccurate data about cancer rates for a presidential campaign ad</a>.</p>
<p>  From the prepared remarks, which I haven't checked against actual delivery:</p>
<blockquote><p> "By fundamentally re-thinking how we use our land, we’ve been able to disprove the conventional wisdom that you just can’t get big projects done anymore.  When the West Side Sports and Convention Center didn’t win State approval, it was popular to say that the conventional wisdom was right.  But it wasn’t."   </p></blockquote>
<p>  Bloomberg also boasted of being able to keep the city "moving forward in directions that the Manhattan Institute has pointed the way on." </p>
<p>The full (prepared) speech is after the jump. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/bloomberg-manhattan-institute">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/bloomberg-manhattan-institute#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51440">Manhattan Institute</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/michael-bloomberg">Michael Bloomberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rudolph-giuliani">Rudolph Giuliani</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:58:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Azi Paybarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">59733 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
