<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Variety</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51520/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>V Redux to Send New Generation Cowering Into Parents&#039; Beds</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/v-redux-send-new-generation-cowering-parents-beds</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>According to a <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117993725.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1">report</a> from <em>Variety</em>'s Michael Schneider, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0085106/"><em>V</em></a>, the 1983 alien invasion mini-series, is being redeveloped for television. (This comes via <a href="http://tvtattle.com/">TVTattle</a>.)</p>
<p>Writes Mr. Schneider:</p>
<blockquote><p>ABC is developing a new adaptation of the franchise — which spawned a second mini and TV spinoff — written by &quot;The 4400&quot; co-creator/exec producer <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0676671/">Scott Peters</a>.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> Warner Bros. TV, which was behind the original longform, is once again producing the project, which was sold as a spec script to the Alphabet net.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mr. Peters is quoted as saying, &quot;Whenever I mention 'V' to anybody, they still have a lot of good memories about the original movie and series. … Everybody has that imagery of their uniforms, or the visitor eating a hamster. It's a science fiction icon and too good to pass up.&quot;
<p>&quot;Good memories&quot;? We just remember being completely terrified. But not as terrified as we were watching <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VG2aJyIFrA"><em>The Day After</em></a> that same year.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/v-redux-send-new-generation-cowering-parents-beds#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51106">ABC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51520">Variety</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:42:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76786 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>God is Dead (And Other Explanations for The Love Guru)</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/god-dead-and-other-explanations-love-guru</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>In a recent <i>New Yorker</i> <a>essay</a> on the subject of theodicy, James Wood wrote:<br />
<blockquote>Theologians and philosophers talk about 'the problem of evil,' and the hygienic phrase itself bespeaks a certain distance from extreme suffering, the view from a life inside the charmed circle. They mean the classic difficulty of how we justify the existence of suffering and iniquity with belief in a God who created us, who loves us, and who providentially manages the world.</p></blockquote>
<p>With this philosophical framework in mind, let's look at some of the reviews of Mike Myers' <i>The Love Guru</i>.</p>
<p>"A whole new vocabulary seems to be required. To say that the movie is not funny is merely to affirm the obvious. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/god-dead-and-other-explanations-love-guru">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/god-dead-and-other-explanations-love-guru#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/45176">Mike Myers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25629">Slate Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50051">The New York Post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51520">Variety</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:12:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71000 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Finke to Defamer: No Links For You</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/finke-defamer-no-links-you</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Nikki Finke, <em>The Observer</em>'s <a href="/2008/media-mensch-year">2007 Media Mensch of the Year</a>, has a bone to pick with <a href="http://defamer.com/">Defamer</a>. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/finke-defamer-no-links-you">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/finke-defamer-no-links-you#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/46657">Creative Artists Agency Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53770">Defamer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53509">Nikki Finke</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25629">Slate Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52585">The Los Angeles Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51520">Variety</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:37:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69767 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Publisher&#039;s Weekly and Variety On the Auction Block</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/publishers-weekly-and-variety-auction-block-0</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Reed Elsevier, the UK company that owns <em>Publisher's Weekly</em> and <em>Variety</em>, is selling off its magazine division, <a href="http://www.thebookseller.com/news/53623-reed-to-sell-off-magazine-division.html">according to trade site The Bookseller</a>. </p>
<p>The Bookseller reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>The company's LexisNexis business posted adjusted operating profits of £406m, an increase of 7% on 2006's £380m, while Elsevier posted a 3% increase in adjusted operating profit, from £465m to £477m. </p>
<p>Reed Elsevier's chief executive, Sir Crispin Davis, said: &quot;We have made good progress over the last year. Investment against our online growth and workflow solutions strategy is paying off with good revenue momentum. Together with our cost initiatives, this is driving underlying margin improvement and a strong earnings performance. The decline of the US dollar takes some shine off the earnings performance expressed in sterling and euros, but the strength of the underlying growth is very encouraging with 2007 representing the highest constant currency earnings growth of the last ten years.&quot;</p>
 <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/publishers-weekly-and-variety-auction-block-0">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53414">Publisher&amp;#039;s Weekly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53415">Reed Elsevior</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51520">Variety</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:28:51 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Leon Neyfakh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65438 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Variety Launches New Social Networking Site For the Entertainment Biz</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/i-variety-i-launches-new-social-networking-site-entertainment-biz</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Move over Facebook, there’s a new social networking site in town! Only this one’s geared exclusively towards entertainment professionals. Yesterday, the industry trade pub Dailey Variety unveiled “The Biz” (variety.com/thebiz), which it’s billing as the first social networking Web site for the entertainment business.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/i-variety-i-launches-new-social-networking-site-entertainment-biz">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/i-variety-i-launches-new-social-networking-site-entertainment-biz#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51016">Facebook</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51520">Variety</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:09:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Pompeo</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65263 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Come Si Dice &quot;Strike&quot;...?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/como-dice-strike</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Italy's screenwriters, acting in solidarity with their American counterparts, are threatening to strike, <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117976133.html?categoryid=2821&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2565">according to</a><em> Variety</em>...
<p>&quot;Prompted by their overseas WGA colleagues, Italy's screenwriters are rattling sabers and threatening strike action over new media residuals,&quot; the magazine reports. &quot;TV scribe Andrea Purgatori, who is the screenwriters' rep within Italian artistic copyright association SIAE is sounding a call to action, lamenting a lack of royalties pertaining to Italian film and TV drama product sold for web and mobile phone use.&quot;</p>
<p>Insert your own, aren't-Italians-on-permanent-work-stoppage-anyway? joke here.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/como-dice-strike#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28216">Italy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51244">strike</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51520">Variety</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:11:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">60562 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Variety Sucks Up to Studios on Strike</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/variety-sucks-studios-strike</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>In the days leading up to the writers’ strike, Guild members took to blogs to blow off steam about those hard-bitten studio heads—and also, to complain about what they saw as unbalanced coverage in <em>Variety</em>. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/variety-sucks-studios-strike">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/variety-sucks-studios-strike#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/37875">Peter Bart</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51520">Variety</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:38:36 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">59982 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
