<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Tax Breaks</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51720/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Roaring &#039;00s for Real Estate Developers to End</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/roaring-oughts-commercial-real-estate-developers-come-end</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The last decade may have been awesome for the Fat Cats of commercial real estate -- but the next one isn't looking as promising.</p>
<p>Tax breaks designed to spark commercial real estate development in New York City amounted to $500 million last fiscal year, and the last 10 years saw such tax breaks more than double, according to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2637481020080828">Reuters</a>, which recapped an Independent Budget Office <a href="http://www.ibo.nyc.ny.us/">report</a> issued today.</p>
<p>Unfortunately for commercial real estate developers -- who are already languishing, thanks to the scarcity of financing -- state-wide reforms advocated by Mayor Bloomberg that kicked in this June are expected to shrink those tax breaks:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The Independent Budget Office said its study "provides strong evidence that (the) Industrial and Commercial Incentive Program benefited a far broader group with more generous benefits than might have been necessary to meet the policy goal.</p>
 <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/roaring-oughts-commercial-real-estate-developers-come-end">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/real-estate/roaring-oughts-commercial-real-estate-developers-come-end#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50174">commercial real estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51720">Tax Breaks</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:32:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Dana Rubinstein</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74073 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Long Island City Business Gets Jamaica&#039;s Tax Breaks</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/long-island-city-business-gets-jamaicas-tax-breaks</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>In an unusual arrangement, the City Council on Thursday voted to let a Long Island City business take advantage of tax breaks that usually go along with the Empire Zone in Jamaica.<br />
<p class="MsoNormal">The concept of these &quot;regionally significant projects&quot; is a little controversial, since <a href="http://www.nylovesbiz.com/Tax_and_Financial_Incentives/Empire_Zones/default.asp">Empire Zones</a> are set up to benefit a particular neighborhood or region. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/long-island-city-business-gets-jamaicas-tax-breaks">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/long-island-city-business-gets-jamaicas-tax-breaks#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51719">Empire Zones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30002">Jamaica</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24787">Long Island City</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51720">Tax Breaks</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:01:01 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matthew Schuerman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">60488 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
