<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Pier 40</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52831/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>On the Waterfront: Pier 40 and the Limits of Commercial Development</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/waterfront-pier-40-and-limits-commercial-development</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>We may be seeing the limits to public-private partnerships in park development.</p>
<p>The plan to use funds from the development of the West Side waterfront to finance new park construction and maintenance seems to be collapsing. While this doesn’t mean an end to these partnerships, it is a signal that public amenities still require public investment. There really is no such thing as a free lunch.</p>
<p>The latest episode in the Pier 40 saga took place on March 28, when Hudson River Park officials rejected a plan by Related Companies to build a $625 million performing arts complex on Pier 40, located at West Houston Street. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/waterfront-pier-40-and-limits-commercial-development">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/waterfront-pier-40-and-limits-commercial-development#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52995">Green</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26386">Deborah Glick</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29732">Hudson River Park Trust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52831">Pier 40</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26178">Tom Duane</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 07:29:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Cohen, Executive Director, Columbia University’s Earth Institute</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68078 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bad Day For Steve Ross: Related&#039;s Pier 40 Plan Looking Dead, Too</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/bad-day-steve-ross-related-s-pier-40-plan-dead-too</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The Related Companies’ plans for a $600 million entertainment center along the Hudson River at <a href="/2008/tears-piers-west-side-development-stalls">Pier 40</a> is no longer being considered by the Hudson River Park Trust, the city-state agency that governs the park.<br />
<p class="MsoNormal">The news comes as Madison Square Garden <a href="/2008/msg-says-it-s-staying-put-and-renovating-casting-major-doubt-moynihan-plans">announced it was moving forward with renovations</a> of its existing facility, compromising a $14 billion plan to remake Penn Station and create a new office hub nearby, a plan in which Related, chaired by Stephen Ross, is a 50-50 partner with Vornado Realty Trust. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/bad-day-steve-ross-related-s-pier-40-plan-dead-too">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/bad-day-steve-ross-related-s-pier-40-plan-dead-too#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/29732">Hudson River Park Trust</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52831">Pier 40</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50038">Related Companies</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:37:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eliot Brown</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67061 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Will Villagers Sink Related’s Pier 40 Plan? </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/will-villagers-sink-related-s-pier-40-plan</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>With final bids due Friday for the proposed redevelopment of <a href="http://www.hudsonriverpark.org/development/pier40dev.htm#rfp">Hudson River Park’s Pier 40</a>, the West Village community seems all but too eager to shut the door on <a href="http://www.related.com">Related Companies</a>' proposed park and waterside entertainment complex. Instead, many seem to be opting for a community plan that mostly preserves the giant working pier-turned-<a href="http://www.pier40parking.com/">parking lot</a> and ball field complex while still generating enough money to survive.<br />
<p class="MsoNormal">Not that Related isn’t trying to be loved. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/will-villagers-sink-related-s-pier-40-plan">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/will-villagers-sink-related-s-pier-40-plan#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50362">No Channel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">Style</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52831">Pier 40</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51824">The Related Companies</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:58:56 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eliot Brown</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">63631 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
