<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; National Geographic</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54650/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Award Season Continues: Webbys Announced</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/award-season-continues-webbys-announced</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Is <em>Wired</em> better than <em>The New York Times</em>? According to this year's <a href="http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/current.php?season=12">Webby Awards</a>, when it comes to Best Copy/Writing, it sure is. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/award-season-continues-webbys-announced">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/award-season-continues-webbys-announced#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50491">Huffington Post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54650">National Geographic</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52308">The Onion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54649">Webby Awards</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:05:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68787 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
