The New York Times Magazine
Joshua Walter and Robert Leo Dominus Burdick
Joshua Walter and Robert Leo Dominus Burdick
4 pounds, 10 ounces; 4 pounds, 14 ounces read more »
Voice: David Blum Is New New Editor
The Cockpit: The Incident at Comiskey
What defines the "funny pages" is that they have the FUNNIES on them, aka the comics, which the pedants should be warned are not necessarily comical, for instance, again, Cathy. Although some of them are comical, like Mark Trail. Man, it would be boss if Mark Trail showed up in Cathy and punched Cathy in the face. Pow! read more »
HOT WEB G!!RL W@ITING 4 YOU!!#!@#!!
From: "Benoit Denizet-Lewis"read more »Date: October 14, 2005 3:56:16 PM EDT Subject: my new roommate Hi All, Some of you know that I have a new roommate, Natalie. What I just found is that she's an AMAZING [REDACTED]. She was being all quiet/modest about it, but her talent is unbelievable (I don't get easily blown [REDACTED] but DAMN). Have a [REDACTED] to Natalie's [REDACTED] at www.nataliericcio.com. My favorites are "Lovelight On," "Come, Come, Come," and "Waiting." Peace Out Benoit Denizet-Lewis Contributing Writer, New York Times Magazine www.benoitlewis.com 617-XXX-XXXX
Build Anything Anywhere Please—Even in My Backyard
This turn of sentiment has something, though perhaps not everything, to do with the Governor’s pushing out the International Freedom Center. The Times teamed up with Pace University for an excruciatingly focused poll also released today—of 518 residents living below 14th Street—and found them split on the Governor’s decision.
David Dunlap adds:
“And 1,011 New Yorkers were asked six weeks ago by Blum & Weprin Associates for The New York Times Magazine what they thought should be built at ground zero: something shorter or taller than the World Trade Center. Fifty-four percent replied, ‘Any size building as long as they stop arguing about it.’” read more »
-Matthew SchuermanDidion's Annus Horribilis: How Grief Looks on the Page
Hillary Doesn't Move Right
Bai makes the point that The Politicker has been hammering at for a while: Hillary's not "tacking Right" in a conventional way. She doesn't seem ever to have been a real lefty. She is where she's always been, albeit stressing different elements of her political persona at different times.
His take, for what it's worth:
"The truth that emerges from talking to many of those who have worked closely with the Clintons is that Hillary's ideology is best understood through the prism of her upbringing. She was raised as a Republican and a devout Methodist in suburban Chicago, and these influences, particularly in the turbulence of the 60's, created two philosophical impulses that were commonly linked in that era. The first is an unshakable notion of right and wrong and an almost missionary zeal for imposing it on others, mainly through political action. The second is a strand of moral conservatism that borders on prudishness."
Hillary also flirted with the student left, but Bai chalks up the public sense of Hillary as a leftist to her role, in the White House, as ambassador to the left from Bill/Dick Morris triangulation land.
That may be true, but there's also more to it: Hillary's camp, at times, encourages the "Hillary Moves Right" story, since it's a way to amplify her centrist positions. If her anodyne words on abortion earlier this year were not just anodyne, but also old news, they wouldn't have made A1 of the Times.
You can argue that this is a short-term gain, and that the notion that Hillary is shifting her positions damages her in the long term. But Hillary's formidable team doesn't seem to have done anything to pour cold water on the stories on her "shift" on abortion and religion. (They easily could have by, say, putting out copies of her old speeches in which she said exactly the same stuff.)
Bai also paints Hillary as more of a centrist in the Senate than she's really been. Her gestures to the Right tend to be on easy issues, like violence in video games. She'll stand next to Santorum and Gingrich on these side-issues, but that's very different from, say, McCain picking up the fight against global warming. On important and contested issues (with a sole, important exception), Hillary has been a party-line Democrat. Her cultural conservatism -- Bai has a nice scene of her being appalled that young Chelsea would pierce her ears -- hasn't been tested in a public way, though she has said that she would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act.
Anyway, Bai thinks that Hillary's main challenge for 2008 will come from the Kos-land, where the "net-roots" (whose rise Bai has been anticipating for quite a while now) have a different, take-no-prisoners way of doing business.
Over at Tapped, meanwhile, they're of another opinion: that Hillary's real problem won't be style, but substance, and that substance is the war. read more »
Depending on how Iraq looks in a couple of years, it seems plausible that there's an element of truth to both arguments: Hillary will have to cope with an anti-war movement inside the party that draws its organizing strength from the Web.
One thing that's for sure: They'll still be writing the "Hillary Moves Right" story.Everybody's a Public Editor
I don't share Matthew Simmons's angst, but I admire his style. He is that rare doomsayer who puts his money where his doom is.Whatever happened to the good old days when only 'citizen journalists' baited The Times? read more » —Matt HaberAfter reading his prediction, quoted Sunday in the cover story of The New York Times Magazine, that oil prices will soar into the triple digits, I called to ask if he'd back his prophecy with cash. Without a second's hesitation, he agreed to bet me $5,000."
Michael Finkel Hacks Back
Kerrey, Considering
But we did do a quick Nexis search of "Kerrey" and "considering," and it gave us some caution.
First of all, Kerrey was widely reported to be considering a 2004 presidential bid -- until the New York Times Magazine carried an article accusing him of war crimes in Vietnam.
Concord Monitor, November, 1997: ""I haven't made that decision yet. I'm widely rumored to be running" [for President]."
Manchester Union-Leader, July 1994: Bob Kerrey "has told at least one high-ranking Democrat that he is seriously considering taking on the sitting President in a 1996 primary battle."
Kerrey did run in 1992, but later said this: read more »
"That was the problem last time.... I only threw my hat in. If I do it this time, I put a lot more in."









